Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
nothinbutthetruth
02 Jan 17 19:05
Joined:
Date Joined: 03 Feb 11
| Topic/replies: 79 | Blogger: nothinbutthetruth's blog
obviously, the premise behind the 3 dart average is fairly simple, but is it really a 3 dart average? if I play a leg of darts and hit 140, 140, 140 and finish 81 in two darts would I get the same average if I did a leg in 140, 140, 140 and then took out 81 in three darts? TIA

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 13
By:
wisewords
When: 02 Jan 17 19:07
Nope, you'd get a lower average if you checked out the 81 in 3 darts rather than 2.
By:
Angoose
When: 02 Jan 17 19:09
No.

Total points scored divided by total number of darts thrown multiplied by three.
136.6 and 125.3 in your example.
By:
nothinbutthetruth
When: 02 Jan 17 19:11
Thanks for that, so like I suggested in the opening topic, rather than it being a 3 dart average (or visit average) its actually a one dart average multiplied by 3
By:
s.kenbo
When: 02 Jan 17 19:15
Splitting hairs imo.
By:
nothinbutthetruth
When: 02 Jan 17 19:27
over the amount of legs/sets that they play then i'd probably agree, I just think that the terminology of '3 dart average' is misleading. if someone comes to the bad with three darts in there hand wanting 10 and they hit double 12 and bust with the first dart they've only threw one but wasted three
By:
Angoose
When: 02 Jan 17 19:31
All it is looking to do is to provide a rudimentary comparison measure for the benefit of tv, can't remember them talking about three dart averages when Jocky ruled the world.
By:
s.kenbo
When: 02 Jan 17 19:31
Very true.

If they come to the board with three darts in hand needing tops, and they get it first dart, that would theoretically average them 120 too.
By:
s.kenbo
When: 02 Jan 17 19:32
The first nine dart average seemed to get used quite a lot back then, didn't it?
By:
nothinbutthetruth
When: 02 Jan 17 19:40
a bit too young to remember the days of jockey Wilson, my first wold championship final viewing was taylor v manley. then a few years later I had £23 on whitlock at 120 and thought I was a genius. the 9 dart average that you refer to would be like a scoring average then I suppose
By:
s.kenbo
When: 02 Jan 17 19:47
From what I remember, they showed the overall average, plus their first nine dart average too. I suppose it was to make the scoring look even better.
By:
nothinbutthetruth
When: 02 Jan 17 20:10
thanks for the help, enjoy the final!
By:
wisewords
When: 02 Jan 17 20:11

Jan 2, 2017 -- 7:27PM, nothinbutthetruth wrote:


over the amount of legs/sets that they play then i'd probably agree, I just think that the terminology of '3 dart average' is misleading. if someone comes to the bad with three darts in there hand wanting 10 and they hit double 12 and bust with the first dart they've only threw one but wasted three


if they bust with their 1st dart, it's still counted as 3 darts thrown for the average as far as I know.

By:
wondersobright
When: 02 Jan 17 20:19
correct ww
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com