Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
SwingingPick
14 Jul 17 13:01
Joined:
Date Joined: 11 Jul 11
| Topic/replies: 5,589 | Blogger: SwingingPick's blog
The distance: 101kms.

Nearly half of the stage will be downhill.

I have never seen a stage of this short distance at the GT level before, however I think it is possible to know what to expect. The 2016 Vuelta stage 15 was only 119kms long, and the closest distance in the Tour to this stage was in stage 20 of the 2015 edition, which was just 111kms long.

In terms of the amount of climbs, the Vuelta stage appears to be the most similar to this stage with three categorised ascents, however unlike the Vuelta stage which ended in a summit finish, this stage ends with a long descent into a power-descent into the finish, and also the climbs are much harder here than in the Vuelta stage. Nevertheless, in that stage Contador attacked early and formed a 14-man breakaway which included Quintana and caught-out Froome, his teammates scrambling somewhere in back. MOV realised SKY's problem and took advantage by keeping the pace high and isolating Froome from his team, even though Quintana had a teammate with him. Brambilla won from Quintana, and Quintana held a gap of about 2mins to the GC riders.

In the 2015 Tour stage a 4-man breakaway were allowed to go up the road with a gap of up to 8mins, and Pinot eventually went solo to win. A second group went on the main middle climb, but they were brought back by ALM. Again, like the Vuelta stage, this stage ended with a summit finish on Alpe d'Huez, though. Pinot held about a 1:30 gap to the GC riders.

What both stages have in common is the explosive nature of the racing and the substantial gap which can be held by a successful breakaway/attacking rider, and that is very-much what we should expect for this stage, too. This suggests that much like the attacks we see from the start of the stage by those riders looking to get into the day's breakaway, the GC riders are likely to attack each other from the very start of the stage as they look to find vulnerabilities (inattention and fatigue) in their rivals.

This is likely to be a hard stage in terms of a battle-of-attrition, especially amongst the GC men, but I think the descents and particularly the long descent to the finish will have a major influence on the tactics and strategy of the riders involved and therefore the outcome for both stage honours and GC movements.

With Aru in Yellow and essentially unable to defend the jersey with a strong team performance, and ALM signalling their intentions for the win in Paris with Bardet as far back as stage 9 but only getting the result they were seeking on yesterday's stage with Bardet's win, it can be the case that the way to understand the situation on GC (cheers bb66 for your inspiration) is that ALM will effectively ride like they are already in Yellow with Bardet, which will in a way inadvertently boost AST's hold on Yellow with Aru, at least against SKY. My analysis therefore suggests that it is like ALM and AST are in a situation where they have unintentionally united against SKY in an alliance, simply by sharing a common interest in the GC win and being within reach of it. They won't necessarily ride as one, but they will ride against the SKY and that is their common rival because of Froome's strength in the ITT, still to come on the penultimate stage and where Froome will have approximately 30-50secs on Bardet/Aru.     

ALM have shown they have the team to throw flooding numbers at the problem which is SKY, and as we saw they nearly pulled it off with Bardet on stage 9, when the talented FRA rider attacked Froome on the dodgy descent, extended along the flats to easily catch and pass Barguil in the lead, and just fail with 5kms remaining.

Finally, I think ALM have shown that they have what it takes to not only formulate and employ a grand stratagem against their chief rivals in SKY, but that they also have the riders to make it work. They will therefore be looking to launch Bardet off the summit of the final climb, the Mur de Peguere, since Bardet is an excellent descender and will find it easier to hold a race-winning gap along what then becomes a power-descent. To do that, and fitting with the aggressive nature to the start of the race we are likely to witness, I would expect ALM to throw large number into/at the breakaway whilst committing Bardet to sit in and around Froome's wheel. In addition, this stage comes at a perfect time for Aru, and I think that whilst he is being discounted in both the market and with the Books (25/1 SP out to 33/1 and 50s on here) there is no valid reason why he should be seen as inferior. Yes, he has a weak team in comparison to his two main rivals, however Aru is climbing beautifully, can descend very well and has an equal chance to win this stage to Bardet.

In conclusion; unless a really hard rider like Cummings can go out with a committed effort from the break, (Cummings won't because he'll still be recovering from yesterday's stage) and I mean burying himself with some 75kms remaining of the stage, then I think the more likely outcome is fisticuffs from the GC men from the outset and them fighting for the stage win and positions on the GC. I don't think we will get two races, this stage is too short and much too-hyped to expect that the status-quo will ensue and the peloton will sit back by allowing the break a big gap. Plus, the weakness of AST will be seen as a vulnerability worthy of being exploited by multiple attacks from their rivals, and that will have to happen early, and that is consistent with these short stages as those mentioned above.

Having said all that, I think Calmejane (25/2 SP into 20/1) and Benoot (11/1 SP into 14/1) will both be salivating over another opportunity over a stage they would ordinarily consume over morning training, so am looking to keep those two riders safe, but I cannot go past the value of Aru, and another strong ride by Bardet.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 54
By:
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
When: 14 Jul 17 13:22
Nice write up. I was thinking of AST and ALM not exactly working together but certainly both being united in wanting to ditch SKY as much as possible. The position theyll want SKY in is for them to be worried about doing Astanas job for them but also worried about 3 ALM guys up the road waiting to guide Bardet home.
Will SKY just stomp out any breakaways that ALM are involved in or will they put their own in the breakaway and risk Froome being isolated later?
By:
bb66
When: 14 Jul 17 13:38
Henao is SKY'a man for the break, while Landa or Nieve can attack from the leaders group to pull away Froome when he attacks.
By:
bb66
When: 14 Jul 17 14:14
Can't see any AST near the front of the bunchLaugh
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 14:27
ALM haven't even covered Kwiatkowski satellite for Froome...
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 14:33
...They must suspect it's all a bit early for that sort of thing,
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 14:38
Groups all over the road...
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 14:40
Haven't seen much of the front of the main group, but what we know is that the pace is very high, Gilbert and Chavanel are strong riders and have gone off the back of De Marchi who is going hard and is a noted breakway specialist, and yet he hardly has a gap.
By:
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
When: 14 Jul 17 14:41
ALM will probably move gradually on the descents wont they?

No point burning them doing astana/sky job of dragging GC riders to the break. Landa is a red herring anyway.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 14:45
ALM have just blinked first -- controlling the front of the race when it's not their duty.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 14:47
Landa is marking Bertie.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 14:50
ALM now have Vuillermoz covering the earlier move of SKY with Kwiatkowski.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 14:54
If Bertie begins to falter and he should because his shape is poor, I think Landa would be very keen to attack and win. Looked very comfortable yesterday and looks very fresh today, also, whilst not having to do any work.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 14:55
Land's price has just fell out the bottom -- people having the same thoughts, evidently...
By:
padlock
When: 14 Jul 17 15:00
Will the bigboys not catch these on desent downhill?
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:01
How do you reform harmony in your team, if your team is SKY?

You give Landa opportunities.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:03
Not really right now, the riders on the fron the of main group are losing time to these two leaders, and now Landa is getting orders to work with Bertie -- this break looks dangerous but when I say that I mean Landa.
By:
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
When: 14 Jul 17 15:03
I can see the point of Sky countering the multi-pronged GC attack by creating their own multi pronged GC attack but Dont see Landa holding out on the descents
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:05
But they are making such good time climbing -- descending never provides such good time.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:08
Oh, I think I know what you mean -- the power descent into the finish will bring back time on only one or two riders -- that's true. So Kwiatkowski becomes a dangerous proposition, but it's too far out for him on account of the amount of climbing remaining.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:09
Landa only 36secs off VL on the road.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:16
For instance, Kwiatkkowski is an expert descender, one of the best in the peloton, and he could make it across to the leaders, but if he does that he risks bringing Quintana across. That may change into the finale, but for now SKY are the only team making their moves work a treat.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:20
Well actually Kwiatkowski had a little tester there...
By:
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
When: 14 Jul 17 15:21
You have to hand it to sky on GC strategy today. Instead of Froome worrying about whether to chase ALM or mark Aru, bardet, Aru and Uran now have to worry about whether to chase Landa or mark Froome!

I would be giving Landa most rope out of those two options but it gets difficult at what 3 or 3.30 mins?
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:23
If SKY can have two riders in the top-3 on GC -- GAME OVER!
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:29
Last climb of the day, already. Break looks good. Kwiatkowski a big danger, 7s as a request is decent value, I believe.
By:
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
When: 14 Jul 17 15:31
Aru will have to attack big on this climb
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:34
And bring Froome across to Kwiatkowski and potentially Landa -- I don't think so. Aru is losing the Tour without knowing it, apparently. Landa is moving up, and SKY will become too strong.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:37
Quintana not making in-roads on Land and Bertie means less chance of Kwiatkowski attack working -- project 7s not likely under this situation.
By:
bb66
When: 14 Jul 17 15:38
I thoughgt Aru might buy in Bahrain, but not UAESurprised
By:
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
When: 14 Jul 17 15:41
Someone has to wrestle the initiative back off sky. Aru knows Bardet wont do it until near the top. Arus best gains are going for it on his own i reckon, he cab break free of froome if he wants.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:44
Two races on the road -- that's true -- but it's between Bertie and Landa for the stage win.
By:
johnnythebull
When: 14 Jul 17 15:49
is Landa now the Designated hitter for team Sky?
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:50
I don't know that, but SKY become all-powerful with two in the top-3, potentially.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:54
Didn't think these two chasers would bridge...
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:56
Landa won't be told to sit and wait for Froome as Froome did not leave Aru behind.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 15:59
Barguil the fastest in a sprint, but the worst result for me.
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 16:03
Just didn't see him making it across and didn't bother with insurance...
By:
SwingingPick
When: 14 Jul 17 16:05
That gap was just locked-in on about 35-40secs and Landa and Bertie should hold them off -- suddnely they're back! Arghh...
By:
johnnythebull
When: 14 Jul 17 16:05
backed barguil & uran
laid off barguil @2.5
bit prematurely  maybe
but a little green on all now
could yet be an exciting finish
if the maillot jaune grp
start making inroads
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com