|
By:
They needed to be 1/34 if the game was called off. If they went off and there was a 5 over game declared, the target would have been 39 with wickets no longer relevant as they would be calculated into the target.
|
|
By:
i dont know what you dont understand, if 5 overs havent been bowled in the chasing teams innings its declared void, forget about everything else including D/L, if 5 overs havent been bowled in 2nd innings its void
|
|
By:
why are youu still going on about D/L , it doesnt come into the equation, if 5 overs havent been bowled its void, didnt you see the thunder batsmen arguing that they wanted to stay on for another 4 balls, they are the rules of T20
|
|
By:
i know its annoying but it is what it is, if you had a losing bet you would be glad it was void, i had a bet on 6 overs 45+ and they needed 5 off 10 but i got my stake back, just one of those things
|
|
By:
You seem to be the only one that has mentioned it in the last 15 minutes.
And I was asking questions that you don't appear to be able to comprehend in a manner to answer them. |
|
By:
but none of what you said was ever going to happen
|
|
By:
they need to be 1/34 if d/l was applied and if 5 overs had been bowled which it hadnt so void bet
|
|
By:
i totally understand what youre saying but once they went off it was always gonna be a struggle to get back on, another 4 balls and we wouldve had a result but thats life im afraid
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
pointless
|
|
By:
I bet Ferguson and Hale in the top batsmen market. My Ferguson bet was voided and my Hales bet was treated as a loser - surely both bets should be void.
|
|
By:
Either that or Ferguson should be a winner if they are accepting that there was a result in the game
|
|
By:
Diamond duck in a 21 run partnership off 5 balls. :)
|