Jun 4, 2019 -- 3:49PM, wondersobright wrote:

cant be that difficult to write the code for a fully accurate DLS calculatorso amateurish

I'm pretty sure they give weightage to the quality of batsmen. Saw that in a chart some time ago. Someone sits there and gives each batsman a weightage while working out revised scores. And they don't want everyone to know what weightage they are giving to individual players.

I doubt they just give weightage to the batting position. That won't work since we have teams where tail starts at 8 and teams without a tail like England(Remember Rashid has a first class century )

Jun 4, 2019 -- 3:52PM, wondersobright wrote:

if that's the case det surely its an integrity issue

well that's why its probably not just a formula.

Jun 4, 2019 -- 3:51PM, detraveller wrote:

Jun  4, 2019 --  3:49PM, wondersobright wrote:cant be that difficult to write the code for a fully accurate DLS calculatorso amateurishI'm pretty sure they give weightage to the quality of batsmen. Saw that in a chart some time ago. Someone sits there and gives each batsman a weightage while working out revised scores. And they don't want everyone to know what weightage they are giving to individual players.I doubt they just give weightage to the batting position. That won't work since we have teams where tail starts at 8 and teams without a tail like England(Remember Rashid has a first class century )

its not that complicated DT! its done by wickets and overs remaining - "resources"

Jun 4, 2019 -- 4:01PM, wondersobright wrote:

kumar thinks anything over 180 will be challenging pmsl

I think he's correct.

Jun 4, 2019 -- 4:03PM, detraveller wrote:

Not sure why cricketers these days can't just work with singles. They've for 48 deliveries. 30-35 off that would be a great score from 8 down.

milking has largely gone out of the game
its hit hit hit

Jun 4, 2019 -- 4:08PM, detraveller wrote:

my account balance has gone to zero for some reason and I don't even have any open bets on ffs

Sick feeling yeah