Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 169 comments are related to the topic:
South Africa v Pakistan, 1st ODI, Port Elizabeth

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 169
By:
GRANTCKING
When: 19 Jan 19 14:33

Jan 19, 2019 -- 2:32PM, jucel69 wrote:


must have been a tough watch G, just never tried to accelerate, bizarre


it really was, tilted out my mind

By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:34
nothing worse than being on overs and seeing batting like that, just tapping it around with 8 wickets in the shedCrazy
What was he waiting for??
By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:34
They deserve to lose for that
By:
GRANTCKING
When: 19 Jan 19 14:35
selfish bastard
By:
GRANTCKING
When: 19 Jan 19 14:36
fecking batting as if its a guyana minefield
By:
Nonaynever
When: 19 Jan 19 14:37
I've seen some ridiculous things in my betting life but I think that just about takes the biscuit. Needed 270 and I'm lost for words, Amlah was playing for his 100 from about 70 upwards.

Hope they get smashed.
By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:37
didn't look particularly difficult, a bit of spin.
They started off at 300+ pace and it looked easy
By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:38
Hashim Amla - It's obviously nice to get some runs. Didn't get a lot of runs in ODIs last year, so nice to get back among runs. Rassie batted excellent as it was a tough wicket for a new batsman. It's a slow wicket with a bit of turn, you have to get really used to the surface. 260 on this kind of surface is generally a defendable total.
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 14:38
Got £18 green on both and quite frankly that may be enough
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 14:42
There is a devil on my shoulder trying to tempt me in to putting £500 on SA but I must resist.
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 14:42
Massive correction I got 1.57 SA 10 mins ago.
By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:43
That's topped up the Islamic State's funds
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 14:44
Would not surprise one bit if ISIS were replenshing funds from gambling!
By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:44
Not sure if that's a good total or not.
Hardly any big overs but left 8 wickets in the shed
By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:45

Jan 19, 2019 -- 2:44PM, Cardinal Scott wrote:


Would not surprise one bit if ISIS were replenshing funds from gambling!


> Clean cut family man Hash Amla as the main protagonist Laugh

By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:45

Jan 19, 2019 -- 2:44PM, Cardinal Scott wrote:


Would not surprise one bit if ISIS were replenshing funds from gambling!


> They are definitely into drugs and gambling

By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:46
They need to top up after Big Don and the 'allies' wiped them out
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 14:47
Have to go out for an hour around 5.00pm...just when the chase might be reaching a critical stage. Sad
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 14:53

Jan 19, 2019 -- 2:38PM, jucel69 wrote:


Hashim Amla - It's obviously nice to get some runs. Didn't get a lot of runs in ODIs last year, so nice to get back among runs. Rassie batted excellent as it was a tough wicket for a new batsman. It's a slow wicket with a bit of turn, you have to get really used to the surface. 260 on this kind of surface is generally a defendable total.


Seems a reasonable analysis and I don't think Hash is a Bull$hitter.

By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:56
He does bat in a bubble which is not great for bettors
By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 14:59
SA only have 5 bowlers, Reeza Hendricks, Hashim Amla, Rassie van der Dussen, Faf du Plessis (c), David Miller, Heinrich Klaasen (wk) can't bowl under any circumstances.

Dwaine Pretorius, Andile Phehlukwayo, Kagiso Rabada, Imran Tahir, Duanne Olivier

Not too frightening a proposition in an ODI on a slow pitch
By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 15:01
I don't like backing a side with no room for manoeuvre at all in the bowling.
By:
Charlie
When: 19 Jan 19 15:05
I put a bet on at 3.05 pre-match. Haven't watched it much and odds are exactly the same.

Juce
You seem in better spirits the last few days Grin.
By:
Charlie
When: 19 Jan 19 15:06
Just hoping Pakistan don't collapse in a heap like they often do.
By:
jucel69
When: 19 Jan 19 15:16
I wrote quite a bit there but it disappeared into the BF ether .... again.
In short the haemorrhaging has stopped for now and rebuilding!!
I find it cathartic to vent on forums.
I'm much calmer than what is probably portrayed online
By:
detraveller
When: 19 Jan 19 15:20
well well well, so many posts to REPORT
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:21
This substandard start has had little effect on market.
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:22

Jan 19, 2019 -- 3:20PM, detraveller wrote:


well well well, so many posts to REPORT


I only libelled ISIS

By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:23
Got my green upto £22 both sides.....I know thats laughable to many but I'm super pleased as I am in rebuilding mode too
By:
detraveller
When: 19 Jan 19 15:23
This is the kind of total where Pak have the potential to hit 1.05 and then bust without anyone asking questions. Amla has already said tough conditions to bat. What more do they need?

im not betting but will look to lay pak, if they get in a strong position.
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:24
F*ck me 2 4s and look at the Pak love.
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:25
I suppose when its off the gun bowler understandable.
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:26
F*CK ME Flippage is not far away!
By:
detraveller
When: 19 Jan 19 15:27
Laugh
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:27
I'm wistful at what I missed out on. Sad
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:31
Evens was hit!
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:31
********************F*L*I*P*P*A*G*E*******************
By:
GRANTCKING
When: 19 Jan 19 15:32
go on pak punish these cheats
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:32

Jan 19, 2019 -- 2:42PM, Cardinal Scott wrote:


There is a devil on my shoulder trying to tempt me in to putting £500 on SA but I must resist.


LaughLove

By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 19 Jan 19 15:33
That was when they were sub 1.5 Grin
Page 2 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com