CT2017 - 1st Semi-final: England v Pakistan at Cardiff > Betfair Community

Betfair Community

Home › Cricket Forum › CT2017 - 1st Semi-final: England v Pakistan at Cardiff

Switch to Community Classic App Directory

Cricket

‹ back to topics

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

These 408 comments are related to the topic:
CT2017 - 1st Semi-final: England v Pakistan at Cardiff

Switch to Live View refresh Post Reply

Post your reply

Page 9 of 11 • Previous | 1 | ... | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Next

sort by:

Show per page

Replies: 408

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 15:42

Don't know what Indian Nationalism is.

By:

Sodiology When: 14 Jun 17 15:43

Charlie • June 14, 2017 3:36 PM BST
And let's not forget that £500 at 6's can get get you out a bit if needs be.
Report Charlie • June 14, 2017 3:40 PM BST
And if you push that up to 8's then you shouldn't lose.

What??

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 15:44

What what?

By:

johnnythebull When: 14 Jun 17 15:45

hubristic bottling England getting owned
The Alamo pales into insignificance

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 15:46

Sodi
I think we're on different planets.

By:

Sodiology When: 14 Jun 17 15:49

£500 what at 6's and what at 8's?

You just backed England 1.4 and below

Then mentioned Pak at 1.36

So I don't know how you're going to get level or even trade the rest of this.

The £500 @ 6's can get you out? Doesn't make sense to me.

By:

rommel When: 14 Jun 17 15:49

THIS IS EPIC BONELESS WONDERYYY

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 15:50

I was referring to backing Pakistan at short odds after taking a big red. I like a get out out plan. £500 at 6's would have helped - could red or gamble. Same stake at 8's would obviously be better.

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 15:54

Sodi
These are average odds: backed England 3.35, backed Pakistan 1.19, laid Pakistan 1.7. Stakes are considerably different.

By:

johnnythebull When: 14 Jun 17 15:59

11 Theresa Mays could not have performed as lamentably as this uber overrated shower

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 16:00

Currently still slightly red. 1.03 gets me green. £500 at 6's makes position tenable. £500 at 8's more so and is the odds where regardless of what you've done before you shouldn't lose.

By:

tomtimtum When: 14 Jun 17 16:00

not out for me

By:

Sodiology When: 14 Jun 17 16:01

If who hits 6's or 8's? Waiting for Pak to hit that?

How does Pak 1.03 make you all green

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 16:03

Sodi I'm struggling to explain this to you but I'll try.

There only two things are odds and stakes.

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 16:04

In English: the only two things are odds and stakes.

By:

detraveller When: 14 Jun 17 16:06

oh my. Taken a beating her. 118-0 Pakistan! Wtf?

Surely Pak dont fk it up from here. Is this a dream? Or is this the reality?

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 16:07

Sodi

I'm honestly trying to answer your questions. What don't you understand?

By:

detraveller When: 14 Jun 17 16:09

I think you need to tell him that you've screwed your balls on this so you've put up 30k on Pakistan at 1.1 and need them to hit 1.03 to get even.

I think he's confused about you wanting Pakistan 1.03 when you are basically in this position because of them winning.

By:

detraveller When: 14 Jun 17 16:11

Stokie has spanked us again i see.

By:

Cardinal Scott When: 14 Jun 17 16:13

Pakistan LOVE Cardiff, turned over England here last september when Eng were sub 1.1, monday of course and now this train.

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 16:13

I'm no where near 30k on this. All I can say is two biggest bet by far were Pakistan at 1.36 and 1.1.

By:

Cardinal Scott When: 14 Jun 17 16:15

Jun 14, 2017 -- 4:13PM, Charlie wrote:

I'm no where near 30k on this. All I can say is two biggest bet by far were Pakistan at 1.36 and 1.1.

I hope yoiu use 2 Step Authentication if you have a huge betting bank!

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 16:15

And now I'm green

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 16:17

And cashed out.

By:

tomtimtum When: 14 Jun 17 16:17

Most disappointing performance from England that I've ever seen

By:

Sodiology When: 14 Jun 17 16:18

You can't be green ffs, it's been a train and you're on England sub 1.4

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 16:18

And now I'm safe I would like to know a bit more Sodi. Explain please why you're doubting what I said?

By:

Sodiology When: 14 Jun 17 16:20

I just can't understand it. It's been a one way train, so how are you green, I'm interested more than doubtful.
Can you PM me all your bets?

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 16:21

Sodi I don't lose my temper very often but you're pushing me. You're either a wind up merchant, a cnt (highly probable) or thick. Odds and amount. What don't you understand?

By:

Charlie When: 14 Jun 17 16:23

I'll PM you of course I will. I'll place your bets for you and if they they lose will pay your debts.

By:

Sodiology When: 14 Jun 17 16:23

You winding me up?!

You backed England for lots sub 1.4 .... three times.

Then are somehow all green, yet it being a one way train

explain your bets?

By:

detraveller When: 14 Jun 17 16:23

Charlie I can hear you swear while typing

By:

stokergoinup When: 14 Jun 17 16:24

Jun 14, 2017 -- 4:23PM, Charlie wrote:

I'll PM you of course I will. I'll place your bets for you and if they they lose will pay your debts.

Is that offer open to everyone

By:

Cardinal Scott When: 14 Jun 17 16:24

He can be green if he used ever escalting stakes ......like 20X & more, 30X ...I've done it myself in the past.

By:

detraveller When: 14 Jun 17 16:25

That's what he did, like he said. But Sodi doesn't get it.

By:

Cardinal Scott When: 14 Jun 17 16:25

Jun 14, 2017 -- 4:24PM, Cardinal Scott wrote:

He can be green if he used ever escalting stakes ......like 20X & more, 30X ...I've done it myself in the past.

Very Dangerous Game I might add!

By:

Sodiology When: 14 Jun 17 16:25

Cardinal - if that's the way people go though, it's hardly trading, it's just loading on small odds? which when eventually it goes wrong you lose the lot?!

By:

detraveller When: 14 Jun 17 16:26

Jun 14, 2017 -- 4:25PM, Sodiology wrote:

Cardinal - if that's the way people go though, it's hardly trading, it's just loading on small odds? which when eventually it goes wrong you lose the lot?!

Yes. That's why I said earlier that when you are asking people for advice, you need to know their betting style.

By:

Sodiology When: 14 Jun 17 16:27

I just don't get the point of trading if you're gonna load on pak at 1.1?
Might as well not trade and just back short odds?!

By:

Cardinal Scott When: 14 Jun 17 16:27