We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1476 comments are related to the topic:
West Indies v Pakistan - 3rd Test at Roseau
West Indies v Pakistan - 3rd Test at Roseau
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,476
|
By:
Two of the wickets lost were last ball before tea and last over before lunch - what's with these chokers?
|
|
By:
Typical
 |
|
By:
I just dint find the idea of blocking so much...so 72 overs should typically fetch them 220-250 they r at 152 and have no chance of getting pak in pressure...
|
|
By:
I wanted those 2 to take me to the Promised Land!
|
|
By:
CS Chase and Holder r still there..Singh I hope should give in quickly
|
|
By:
Got rid of some more draw red, felt a little bit too exposed.
|
|
By:
Planning to offload some more of my draw red..but would wait for the new ball with couple of overs
|
|
By:
WILL!
|
|
By:
Hahahaha....it is conditional...!!! so I would..!!!
|
|
By:
Its not conditional, you are going to!
|
|
By:
yeah but I would offload in the event the new ball does nothing...damn this match is boring
|
|
By:
That is conditional
|
|
By:
Is this the most boring test match you've ever seen
|
|
By:
Pretty much..the closest to this was a boring draw by the likes of Laxman in Bridgetown when they refused to chase around 180 in 2 sessions to win the match
|
|
By:
That day I got burnt...and have a feeling would get burnt here as well
|
|
By:
Would is a past-tense form of will. If you are writing about past events, you can use it to indicate something that was in the future at that point in time, but is not necessarily in the future right now. In other words, you use would to preserve the future aspect when talking about the past.
|
|
By:
Will is used to form Future Simple, to describe something that takes place in the future.
|
|
By:
WILL get burnt steam!
|
|
By:
In other news Chelsea being kept goal less in the first half..feck that is another loss coming my way
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Sorry, not laughing at your loss!
|
|
By:
Feck it you are more annoying then my fat English lecturer..I should have listened to her more..
|
|
By:
but if I could have I would have..
|
|
By:
correct usage of would
  |
|
By:
I am FAT but I am not dumb lol
|
|
By:
how much do you weigh steam
|
|
By:
69
|
|
By:
how can you be fat at 60 kg
|
|
By:
69*
|
|
By:
look from the eyes of my wife...!!!
|
|
By:
After 10 years she finds 69 FAT..!!!
|
|
By:
once the market sees the new ball doing now, draw will be 1.8 !
|
|
By:
Yeah it won't be long ...probably another 2 overs and it would be 1.8
|
|
By:
will be lol
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I feel so proud Steam
|
|
By:
First I teach you IPL, then English
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
You are the teacher I never had..!!! Gambling and English..!!
|