Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Yorks price stupidly short price here. Day night matches best to bat first so best to wait for toss.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 260
|
By:
Bairstow, Root and Ballance available for Yorks - I guess thats why they are so short.
|
|
By:
Is generally an awful lot of Yorkshire love in the market anyway but yep, guess Root and Bairstow at least are pretty major players. I've got on Kent at 3s anyway: can't be turning down that sort of price in a limited overs game.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
*form
|
|
By:
Agree with you trader pj but very easy to see us losing our cash on this one.
|
|
By:
Totally agree trader - Crazy odds imo - Kent are a good side at home and they've got some quality batsmen.
Market always loves the yorkies. |
|
By:
Bit of a move in odds hope that means Kent are batting first.
|
|
By:
Don't like that Kent won toss and opted to field.
|
|
By:
Managed to miss on my back of Northamptonshire against Surrey at 2.5 and stopped paying attention to drop it and they've started really well too and are now below evens. Most irritating.
Have to decide what to do with my Kent money. I got a top up at 3.15 so could easily reduce exposure but don't really mind letting it run. |
|
By:
Cashed out and having a rethink.
|
|
By:
Worried about a Yorks train. If early wicket, and odds rise which is not a given, I'll back Yorks. If no early wicket then I'll wait for odds to go around 1.2. At least that's the plan right now but I'll probably not stick to it.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I'm not sure how long before kick-off they have the toss but was convinced that whoever won toss would bat.
|
|
By:
don't agree with this stuff about the yorkies being too short.
this yorkshire side is about 75:25 to beat kent. |
|
By:
Changed my mind already and put a back up at 1.65.
|
|
By:
not sure how the kent pie chuckers will get root out!!!
|
|
By:
yorkshire bat first
|
|
By:
Yorkshire have a very strong batting lineup with 6 genuine bowlers to boot. However, the last time I saw Root and Co back in the team for a televised T20 they lost pretty badly! That's clutching at straws if feel, and its a fair price particularly over the longer distance.
|
|
By:
1.6 seems fair 1.47 was too short though.
|
|
By:
Lots of trading going on with Yorks odds.
|
|
By:
TIMBER
|
|
By:
root to bat now looks a good bet
|
|
By:
*top bat
|
|
By:
time to back Yorkshire @ 1.76
 |
|
By:
Agree pj.
|
|
By:
Stevens really starting to show his age. Its like he's twice as grey then when I saw him a month ago.
|
|
By:
Keep thinking this could be a huge score but never quite took off yet.
|
|
By:
they are building a very solid base here
|
|
By:
Yes, I don't like my previous post now. I was a bit impatient.
|
|
By:
* wrong decision to bowl first ** slow pitch, par is 270-275 I would say
|
|
By:
How good are Ireland? If Sharjeel hadn't scored 152, Pakistan would be 75 for 4.
|
|
By:
pj
Thanks. Normally i'd reply and say you are a condescending tw@t and tell you to fck off. But I do respect you so wont! Hope life is good these days and what went on was resolved amicably. |
|
By:
I am sincere!,no thats trading 101 imo
|
|
By:
You need to write a book for us PJ so then we won't never forget.
|
|
By:
David Willey is Yorkshire's secret weapon!
|
|
By:
I think I've been a tw@w by not backing over 300 at 2.x. Considered it earlier then forgot about it.
|
|
By:
Root's not looking a busy as he normally does, a bit miffed at the lack of pace in what must surely seem like B class cricket to him.
|
|
By:
If we apply the normal double the score after 30 overs then a big total.
|