Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 600 comments are related to the topic:
T20 WC - South Africa v WIndies
T20 WC - South Africa v WIndies
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 600
|
By:
agreed. seems like buying money. but all it takes is chris to misfire
|
|
By:
Should be an easy chase but you never know!
|
|
By:
Brilliant beginning and end from WI and they hardly let SA get away in between either. I suppose you could argue that WI as a bit short of proper batting as there are a lot of hitters but they only need a run a ball. Even if Gayle fails, you'd have to expect them to make it pretty easily a very good slice of the time.
|
|
By:
I will not be laying this off for sure.
 |
|
By:
I've topped up for another £300 at 1.26. Feels like it should be about 1.15. Say they get to 20/2 from 5, a terrible start, it's still under 7 an over for just over 100 more runs. It's a one decent partnership or two okay ones and it's done chase.
Watch them get to 30/6 off 5 now. |
|
By:
Some serious money laying WI
|
|
By:
some money moving the market now? it's the funds looking for a quick 5%
|
|
By:
Up to 1.28? What do they know that we don't? SA have a promising but raw opener and a gun spinner (but much less effective when you don't need to hit him) and the rest is pretty useless.
|
|
By:
A bit of a conundrum for me. Red leaves me slightly up for the day's matches and a substantial improvement on Winner's market if Windies win. Leave it and could win now but be down on Winner's market if SA win.
|
|
By:
no point back windies at 1.28 when the money is pressuring their price the other way.
gayle goes early and you'll get a monstrous 1.55~1.65. then it's time to get involved. |
|
By:
Murky waters Charlie
|
|
By:
I don't usually go to a grand on limited overs but wasn't going to turn down 1.29 for another £200. Will sting if they screw it up.
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
CHRISTOPHER HENRY FAIL
|
|
By:
squeaky bum time
|
|
By:
OH CHRISTOPHER UR SO CHRIS FAIL
|
|
By:
missed. smashed it?
|
|
By:
Dstyle nails it
 |
|
By:
will WI reach 100?
 |
|
By:
Reded for minimal loss, too good to refuse given both markets. May go back.
|
|
By:
he had plenty of time to lay WI on BF
|
|
By:
WI not averse to an implosion either
|
|
By:
In fact backed Windies now.
|
|
By:
I don't like backing filthy sloggers on slow decks
|
|
By:
why can't sky put up live BF prices?
|
|
By:
Nor me Juce. Will get out soon if I can. A couple of boundaries.
|
|
By:
morriss trying to be a hardman
just bowl u divvy |
|
By:
i prefer these low scoring tense games
|
|
By:
swinging like German pensioners in a dirty dungeon
|
|
By:
nice juce
|
|
By:
saffers seem up for this
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
a swinger and a miss
|
|
By:
SA in deep treouble here
|
|
By:
he's down in the basement Charlie
|
|
By:
44444444444444
|
