Cricket
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:36PM, tomtimtum wrote:
Juce took Bobs bet
I'd love it if I won
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:37PM, jucel69 wrote:
Mar 23, 2016 -- 12:36PM, tomtimtum wrote:Juce took Bobs betI'd love it if I won
I'd faint.
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:38PM, bobweenit wrote:
EASY 70 NOTES
Lot to be said for it in the correct situation but that's not always going to be so easy to get right.
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:39PM, jucel69 wrote:
I'd like a 30 over from Jordan
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:40PM, tomtimtum wrote:
41 from 3 overs not impossible
You put 8k on a short odds before didn't you and nearly filled ur kegs!
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:42PM, bobweenit wrote:
When Juice? Nah not worried Tom!
Tom did, not me
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:43PM, detraveller wrote:
bob? worried yet?
bricking it
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:44PM, Charlie wrote:
I think backing 1.01 now was better than backing 1.1 at start of match.
In hindsight Dam right!
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:50PM, tomtimtum wrote:
Laid at 340 and next ball 6 lol. Hope you're joking bob!
No but no way they lose so not bothered
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:51PM, jucel69 wrote:
show me 10k yer filthy hounds
your not gettin my money
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:52PM, johnnythebull wrote:
they could've been after winning this if they had batted half sensibly
YUP
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:52PM, johnnythebull wrote:
they could've been after winning this if they had batted half sensibly
agree
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:58PM, jucel69 wrote:
0.8 net r/r increase to + 0.4, still behind sa & wi
Yep but one of those will go down wont it when they play each other?
Mar 23, 2016 -- 1:59PM, Charlie wrote:
Mar 23, 2016 -- 12:58PM, jucel69 wrote:0.8 net r/r increase to + 0.4, still behind sa & wiYep but one of those will go down wont it when they play each other?
unless it's a tie!
