Jan 4, 2016 -- 11:22PM, detraveller wrote:
They'll stay on juce, tons of rain coming sydney way. Ill go to bed now. Hope to se WI 248/7 at stumps when i wake up. Cheers!
rain all day for mine
Jan 4, 2016 -- 11:23PM, detraveller wrote:
Im sure they havent bothered calling the teams from their hotels(like they did in bangalore)
as per cricinfo they are starting at 10.45am
Jan 4, 2016 -- 11:58PM, ada wrote:
So hands up. Who laid at 1.4 lol
Think I took your cash!
Jan 5, 2016 -- 12:10AM, ada wrote:
Why you lay it at 1.4 then??
no I was backing, misread your post
Jan 5, 2016 -- 12:37AM, pxb wrote:
Yeh. Draw should be 1.05.I think what happened was draw backers panicked when comms talked about play starting and they rushed for the exits at the same time. Unfortunately, I'd cancelled most of my bets, although got some small draw backs near 1.4
I got as much as I could.
Jan 5, 2016 -- 5:33AM, pxb wrote:
After the afternoon BoM forecast.
Just seen it, expecting another 25 mm tomorrow
1.01 nap once that filters through
Jan 5, 2016 -- 5:40AM, pxb wrote:
Bom now forecasting rain most of tomorrow.Lumped on 1.12. Should be 1.06 by tomorrow morning.
me too got 1.11
Jan 5, 2016 -- 5:50AM, jucel69 wrote:
That's going to be a big shock to people who thought Wed/Thurs was going to be clear.
Especially Aus backers in England who are probably still sleeping
Jan 5, 2016 -- 7:29AM, Charkitz wrote:
Yep $1.08 looks huge now with new forecast. I've basically given up on my Oz back bet. Ah well, still think it was a good bet, just unlucky the LOW hung around for an extra day. I still reckon Oz would've won this with 6 sessions + extra overs. They'll struggle to win it in 3 sessions lol
For sure, if there were 200 overs left & a good forecast I would be backing Oz too.
Jan 5, 2016 -- 8:57PM, nigelpm1 wrote:
no harm laying 1.03 for fun - in case we get a move like y'day.
tbf it wasn't raining this time yesterday (even though more rain was on the way), pissing down at the SCG right now.
Cricinfo was also ramping play & gave a start time of 10.45am
Jan 5, 2016 -- 10:16PM, nigelpm1 wrote:
Doubt there was yesterday either
Yeh there were quite a few yesterday as it was the "Pink" day for Jane Mcgrath.
Jan 6, 2016 -- 9:03PM, gnashersblackpool wrote:
danger is they might engineer a game. ie declare both teams ist innings wi bat for 6 or 7 ovs score 75/100 and set aus 350 in 90 overs.
That's the only reason why Aus are still only 150/1. The Hail Mary backers are the only ones left.
Jan 6, 2016 -- 9:10PM, aston wrote:
No thats not going to happen but if the Aussies can knock the first 3 over in the first half an hour and Warner goes bezerk they might try to get ahead before tea, declare and try and hope for a calypso collapso. Mind you that would require a full days play.
We are all starting to get into fantasy world scenarios where Aus skittle WI, then score 400 off 40 overs and bowl WI out 2nd dig in 40 overs.
Jan 6, 2016 -- 8:12PM, nigelpm1 wrote:
can't work out why WI innings runs over 250 is 1.28 - only £26 but looks pretty safe.
because:
1) WI might declare to make a game of it
2) We might not get any play at all
In both cases the bet is NOT void.
Jan 7, 2016 -- 12:47AM, wondersobright wrote:
what is the point ffsdeclare, then aus declare, then WI smash a quick 100 and set aus 350 to win off 65 overschance to take something meaningful out of a woeful tour for themotherwise fck off home
They gave you free mone on the draw. What else do you want? If you are looking for cricket, you are watching the wrong series.
Jan 7, 2016 -- 2:05AM, pxb wrote:
Warne can be amusing, but a lot of the time he should STFU.
Embarrassing, I turned off after the first 20 mins or so. Moaning about WI not setting the game up & then some ludicrous scenarios about how Aus could win
.
WI could only lose if they set something remotely attainable, as their attack is so weak.