kent vs lanchashire 20 20

53-3 kent after 8.1

best catch ever that

kent legend stevens out

Aug 15, 2015 -- 3:08PM, slip5 wrote:

best catch ever that

absolute cracker

He should of hit it for six tbh. Full bunga on leg stump

Fabian, what a fookin name

is he in the famous cowderey family

he looks like an arse bandit, so probably a public school boy

that fan take the mick out of Faulkner there

waving a beer in his face

Aug 15, 2015 -- 3:18PM, slip5 wrote:

waving a beer in his face

they still will get 150 I think the bowling is shiitte

should bring Faulkner on now

gsm that

yep, the only reason I backed Lancs is because the women have been playing for 4 days on this ground + weather. Didn't expect Kent to bat this badly though.

time to get Faulkner on to wrap up this innings

don't want to settle back here lanchashire could end up with tricky 135 chase

I knew they would get 150 ffs was never going to be easy win

Aug 15, 2015 -- 3:27PM, slip5 wrote:

don't want to settle back here lanchashire could end up with tricky 135 chase

Going to be a few more

this is a joke 50 run partnership

Treadwell a tailender and the idiots give feeding him short leg stump balls

davies is he a batter or bowler?

can barely hit the ball

why play that shot you plank

umpiring still shiitte

nice commentary from fat bob there.

"you watch that and think you can do that but you can't."

nick compton was very impressed with the willy exhibition.

wtf lanchashire doing here

not out

he never touch it

buttller trying to over hit ball the mug

6 off 6 they should win the fooking mugs

I cant believe this buttler the mug

anyone watching

i am

Yep

voidnificent

did lanchashire win

what about bookmaker rules

So what's going on, is it void? Or Lancs win?

lancs win lost fewest wickets

betfair prob void thou which is wrong really as lancs have won

Could have done with a void since I'm red on both, oh well.

They're probably deciding right now at BF HQ on what to do.

all bets void

Settled as a void.

hello

Nice one. Sorry for anyone who lost out.

how can you only tie when you require 6 off 6

Why the hell was it void, stopped watching when I had nice green...

Proper choke job from Lancs. they're lucky it didn't cost them.

I think Betfair interpretation was that match was tied but Lancashire won tie breaking rule, bit like super over. Bit of a choker if you greened
but I was always trading to those rules. should have been lancs easy. Croft managed to balls up a walkover.

Lancs win yet the bets are void

should not pay out on tie as it was not a tie as Lancs lost less wickets

Waste of 3.5 hours for anyone who bothered

betfair should follow rules of tournament

DISGRACE FROM BETFAIR!

wtf stan james settle has dead heat so you end up losing money if you on lancs

I had a £100 bet on lancs at 11/10 at one of there shops and I end up losing money fooking con

If void then hope betfair closed super-over market with 5 balls to go as it was not
possible to have one

What about if they both lost same amount of wickets and tied on runs scored? Would there have been a super over then?

dead heat at bet365 too

then will be most 6, then most 4, etc

What about if they both lost same amount of wickets and tied on runs scored? Would there have been a super over then?


could not happen with i think 5 balls to go so on the layers of super over
could win SUppose its like backing 0-0 when score already 1-0

What im really trying to say is you were backing a 1000/1 shot at
odds of probably around 6/1-10/1 good work laying if you can get it

From the market rules:
"For the avoidance of doubt, if scores are tied at the completion of both innings then any tie breaker that may be used to determine a winner including, but not limited to, bowl outs, Super Overs, one-over eliminators, losing fewer wickets, run rates, coin toss, higher group position does not count for the purposes of this market."

Forgot this bit for the Match Odds market:
"If scores (including a derived target score using the Duckworth Lewis method) are deemed tied at the completion of both innings then all bets on the Match Odds market will be void."

"Please note there is a separate Tied Match market available for this game."

Just woke up to this ffs

this is the biggest nonsense in betting

The match has not been tied so anyone betting on a tied match should not have won

Will the match end with the scores tied

The amount of runs scored were level but Lancs won by losing fewer wickets so the scores were not tied

I did not have a bet on the game and being a lanky fan I'm very pleased with the outcome but I have been stung on this ruling in the past
When there is an outright result maybe they should have 2 markets - who will win the outright game (this eliminates the game being tied) and who will win the match (for those who don't mind trading for 3 hours and the game being voided !). Obviously in a group game where points are shared then a tie is the correct result

I rarely bet on this 20/20 stuff but had £100 on Lancs at 1.13 and thought I had blown it when Buttler got himself out. Was quite relieved to get away unscathed. I was always sure a tie would be a void bet and that was a tie.

We all watch a lot of IPL and the call of Thai goes out all the time when there is a close game. I'd be peed off too but there seems to be a lot of whingeing going on about this adjudication.