|
By:
We all watch a lot of IPL and the call of Thai goes out all the time when there is a close game. I'd be peed off too but there seems to be a lot of whingeing going on about this adjudication.
|
|
By:
I rarely bet on this 20/20 stuff but had £100 on Lancs at 1.13 and thought I had blown it when Buttler got himself out. Was quite relieved to get away unscathed. I was always sure a tie would be a void bet and that was a tie.
|
|
By:
this is the biggest nonsense in betting
The match has not been tied so anyone betting on a tied match should not have won Will the match end with the scores tied The amount of runs scored were level but Lancs won by losing fewer wickets so the scores were not tied I did not have a bet on the game and being a lanky fan I'm very pleased with the outcome but I have been stung on this ruling in the past When there is an outright result maybe they should have 2 markets - who will win the outright game (this eliminates the game being tied) and who will win the match (for those who don't mind trading for 3 hours and the game being voided !). Obviously in a group game where points are shared then a tie is the correct result |
|
By:
Just woke up to this ffs
![]() |
|
By:
"Please note there is a separate Tied Match market available for this game."
|
|
By:
Forgot this bit for the Match Odds market:
"If scores (including a derived target score using the Duckworth Lewis method) are deemed tied at the completion of both innings then all bets on the Match Odds market will be void." |
|
By:
From the market rules:
"For the avoidance of doubt, if scores are tied at the completion of both innings then any tie breaker that may be used to determine a winner including, but not limited to, bowl outs, Super Overs, one-over eliminators, losing fewer wickets, run rates, coin toss, higher group position does not count for the purposes of this market." |
|
By:
What im really trying to say is you were backing a 1000/1 shot at
odds of probably around 6/1-10/1 good work laying if you can get it |
|
By:
What about if they both lost same amount of wickets and tied on runs scored? Would there have been a super over then?
could not happen with i think 5 balls to go so on the layers of super over could win SUppose its like backing 0-0 when score already 1-0 |
|
By:
then will be most 6, then most 4, etc
|
|
By:
dead heat at bet365 too
|
|
By:
What about if they both lost same amount of wickets and tied on runs scored? Would there have been a super over then?
|
|
By:
If void then hope betfair closed super-over market with 5 balls to go as it was not
possible to have one |
|
By:
I had a £100 bet on lancs at 11/10 at one of there shops and I end up losing money fooking con
|
|
By:
wtf stan james settle has dead heat so you end up losing money if you on lancs
|
|
By:
DISGRACE FROM BETFAIR!
|
|
By:
betfair should follow rules of tournament
|
|
By:
Waste of 3.5 hours for anyone who bothered
|
|
By:
should not pay out on tie as it was not a tie as Lancs lost less wickets
|
|
By:
Lancs win yet the bets are void
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
I think Betfair interpretation was that match was tied but Lancashire won tie breaking rule, bit like super over. Bit of a choker if you greened
but I was always trading to those rules. should have been lancs easy. Croft managed to balls up a walkover. |
|
By:
Proper choke job from Lancs. they're lucky it didn't cost them.
|
|
By:
Why the hell was it void, stopped watching when I had nice green...
|
|
By:
how can you only tie when you require 6 off 6
![]() |
|
By:
Nice one. Sorry for anyone who lost out.
|
|
By:
hello
|
|
By:
Settled as a void.
|
|
By:
all bets void
|
|
By:
They're probably deciding right now at BF HQ on what to do.
|
|
By:
Could have done with a void since I'm red on both, oh well.
|
|
By:
betfair prob void thou which is wrong really as lancs have won
|
|
By:
lancs win lost fewest wickets
|
|
By:
So what's going on, is it void? Or Lancs win?
|
|
By:
what about bookmaker rules
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
did lanchashire win
|
|
By:
voidnificent
|
|
By:
Yep
|
|
By:
i am
|
|
By:
anyone watching
|