Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 73 comments are related to the topic:
kent vs lanchashire 20 20

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 73
By:
slip5
When: 15 Aug 15 17:30
what about bookmaker rules
By:
jewell
When: 15 Aug 15 17:30
So what's going on, is it void? Or Lancs win?
By:
slip5
When: 15 Aug 15 17:30
lancs win lost fewest wickets
By:
wit-ham
When: 15 Aug 15 17:31
betfair prob void thou which is wrong really as lancs have won
By:
jewell
When: 15 Aug 15 17:31
Could have done with a void since I'm red on both, oh well.
By:
jewell
When: 15 Aug 15 17:32
They're probably deciding right now at BF HQ on what to do.
By:
betfair123
When: 15 Aug 15 17:33
all bets void
By:
zolas_heel
When: 15 Aug 15 17:33
Settled as a void.
By:
General_Lee
When: 15 Aug 15 17:33
hello
By:
jewell
When: 15 Aug 15 17:34
Nice one. Sorry for anyone who lost out.
By:
slip5
When: 15 Aug 15 17:34
how can you only tie when you require 6 off 6 Laugh
By:
doridoru
When: 15 Aug 15 17:35
Why the hell was it void, stopped watching when I had nice green...
By:
jewell
When: 15 Aug 15 17:36
Proper choke job from Lancs. they're lucky it didn't cost them.
By:
rosebowl
When: 15 Aug 15 17:38
I think Betfair interpretation was that match was tied but Lancashire won tie breaking rule, bit like super over. Bit of a choker if you greened
but I was always trading to those rules. should have been lancs easy. Croft managed to balls up a walkover.
By:
Westender
When: 15 Aug 15 17:38
Lancs win yet the bets are void CryCry
By:
wit-ham
When: 15 Aug 15 17:38
should not pay out on tie as it was not a tie as Lancs lost less wickets
By:
Westender
When: 15 Aug 15 17:38
Waste of 3.5 hours for anyone who bothered
By:
slip5
When: 15 Aug 15 17:40
betfair should follow rules of tournament
By:
doridoru
When: 15 Aug 15 17:40
DISGRACE FROM BETFAIR!
By:
slip5
When: 15 Aug 15 17:42
wtf stan james settle has dead heat so you end up losing money if you on lancs
By:
slip5
When: 15 Aug 15 17:43
I had a £100 bet on lancs at 11/10 at one of there shops and I end up losing money fooking con
By:
wit-ham
When: 15 Aug 15 17:43
If void then hope betfair closed super-over market with 5 balls to go as it was not
possible to have one
By:
jewell
When: 15 Aug 15 17:48
What about if they both lost same amount of wickets and tied on runs scored? Would there have been a super over then?
By:
Bedford
When: 15 Aug 15 17:48
dead heat at bet365 too
By:
Bedford
When: 15 Aug 15 17:48
then will be most 6, then most 4, etc
By:
wit-ham
When: 15 Aug 15 18:06
What about if they both lost same amount of wickets and tied on runs scored? Would there have been a super over then?


could not happen with i think 5 balls to go so on the layers of super over
could win SUppose its like backing 0-0 when score already 1-0
By:
wit-ham
When: 15 Aug 15 18:12
What im really trying to say is you were backing a 1000/1 shot at
odds of probably around 6/1-10/1 good work laying if you can get it
By:
qwerty135
When: 15 Aug 15 18:31
From the market rules:
"For the avoidance of doubt, if scores are tied at the completion of both innings then any tie breaker that may be used to determine a winner including, but not limited to, bowl outs, Super Overs, one-over eliminators, losing fewer wickets, run rates, coin toss, higher group position does not count for the purposes of this market."
By:
qwerty135
When: 15 Aug 15 18:40
Forgot this bit for the Match Odds market:
"If scores (including a derived target score using the Duckworth Lewis method) are deemed tied at the completion of both innings then all bets on the Match Odds market will be void."
By:
qwerty135
When: 15 Aug 15 19:13
"Please note there is a separate Tied Match market available for this game."
By:
jucel69
When: 16 Aug 15 01:54
Just woke up to this ffsSad
By:
toffee87
When: 18 Aug 15 10:42
this is the biggest nonsense in betting

The match has not been tied so anyone betting on a tied match should not have won

Will the match end with the scores tied

The amount of runs scored were level but Lancs won by losing fewer wickets so the scores were not tied

I did not have a bet on the game and being a lanky fan I'm very pleased with the outcome but I have been stung on this ruling in the past
When there is an outright result maybe they should have 2 markets - who will win the outright game (this eliminates the game being tied) and who will win the match (for those who don't mind trading for 3 hours and the game being voided !). Obviously in a group game where points are shared then a tie is the correct result
By:
salmon spray
When: 18 Aug 15 19:02
I rarely bet on this 20/20 stuff but had £100 on Lancs at 1.13 and thought I had blown it when Buttler got himself out. Was quite relieved to get away unscathed. I was always sure a tie would be a void bet and that was a tie.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 19 Aug 15 15:46
We all watch a lot of IPL and the call of Thai goes out all the time when there is a close game. I'd be peed off too but there seems to be a lot of whingeing going on about this adjudication.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com