|
By:
91 needed from 96 balls. NZ coasting to victory.
|
|
By:
HAHAHA.Timing!
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
As if they have a drinks break in the middle of the power play.
|
|
By:
71 needed off 66.
|
|
By:
Should be easy.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
60 needed nd 1.22
![]() |
|
By:
2 singles nd 1.24
![]() |
|
By:
666666666 nd 1.19
![]() |
|
By:
dot 1.2.Haha
|
|
By:
should be 1.05 here u mugs
|
|
By:
666666666666
|
|
By:
still 1.1 fck
|
|
By:
39 of 42 with 7 wickets nd 1.06
|
|
By:
I am seriously going to back NZ to win the WC in 2015. They have the basis for a very good team and as the WC will be at home for them (the final may well be in Australia) all things point to a favourable tournament for NZ. Thoughts?
|
|
By:
33 of 36 with 7 wickets nd 1.05
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
.
|
|
By:
18 of 18 with 7 wickets and 1.05
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
COMEDY GOLD
|
|
By:
6 required of 14 with 7 wickets and ind still 100 not 1000
|
|
By:
PMSL at the mug Indian fielders!!
|
|
By:
Looks like India lost it in the first 10 overs, what were they playing at?
Saw the highlights this morning and there didn't appear to be anything wrong with the pitch, nice sunny day. |
|
By:
i dont know what india where doing 1st 20 overs not looking for singles or anything, batting to set 270 is not a match winning score with there bowling and that ground is very small its hard to defend a total like that. India need specialist batsman like yuvraj singh, gatum gambir, virendar shewag that can play shots all round the ground with ease.
|
|
By:
hardly saw a shot through the offside that went for 4 1st 30 overs from my memory cause the india batsman where poor all round.
|