Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 262 comments are related to the topic:
***India v Sri Lanka***
***India v Sri Lanka***
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 262
|
By:
Confirmed on cricinfo
|
|
By:
If i am not mistaken all the bets placed on the run lines would be void as due to the disruption the loss of overs has been more than 5 overs isnt it?
|
|
By:
915 start.
178 from 26 overs. |
|
By:
How many runs will the listed team score in this innings? At the beginning of play unmatched bets will be cancelled by Betfair and the market will be turned in-play. This market will not be actively managed and it is the responsibility of customers to manage their positions. This market will be settled if 20 overs have been completed in the innings, the batting team is bowled out or has reached the target to win the match. New lines will be added as the team approaches the total. Competition Rules Apply.
|
|
By:
Can't understand why India are so short but market never lies does it ?
|
|
By:
india innings over.
|
|
By:
In One Day matches Over/Under Innings Runs and Innings Sixes bets will be void if the intervention of rain or any other delay results in the number of overs being reduced by 5 or more from that scheduled when the bets were struck unless settlement of bets is already determined.
|
|
By:
Well I'm lumping on the Lankans with my run line lay money !!
|
|
By:
to be fair this DL target is a little steep considering where india are.
178 from 26 should be childsplay tho. |
|
By:
how is D/L fair ffs.. lanka have to chasemore than india scored in less overs.. ridiculous
|
|
By:
india win this now me thinks, lumping !
|
|
By:
I think SL have been harshly treated there by DL
|
|
By:
167 it is, cricinfo made a mistake.
thats a lot easier. |
|
By:
Poor on Sri that...its not T20 regulation...nearly 7 an over...
|
|
By:
all they need is to try and get 67 by the 10th over. then coast home.
|
|
By:
Steiview - I think 178 for the win but 167 for India to qualify ( I think )
|
|
By:
I mean India to concede no more than 167
|
|
By:
you're right cardshark.
that is a harsh DL, but i suppose its better than no game. |
|
By:
78 in the first 10 a lot different to 67.
im gonna mark the chase bettingwise with these targets. 10 - 60 (1wicket) 15 - 95 (2wickets) 20 - 120 (4 wickets) 25 - 150 (5 wickets) |
|
By:
sky have just let us know whats happening, now off to another ad break.
|
|
By:
DL is a stupid system to use and has been since they introduced it
|
|
By:
If SL get a boundary in the first 2 balls they will go to even money !
|
|
By:
any news on mahela?
|
|
By:
Be interesting to see how SL approach it - go early and get ahead or try to tick along and preserve wickets for a late flurry.
|
|
By:
SL will score 165-170 runs and everyone will be happy accept W.Indies.
Unfortunately there is no market for this to bet my house on. |
|
By:
India scored at 4.1 per over. Sri Lanka have to score at nearly 7 an over. Makes no sense. Too focused on wickets and not enough on the effect of the wicket and the time players need to get themselves in, this method.
|
|
By:
162-167 I mean, wrong calculation
 |
|
By:
SoA still betting on Lankan win or changed your position?
|
|
By:
I just got on them again, but temporarily I suspect, as I was all green earlier.
|
|
By:
anyone know the PP overs?
|
|
By:
1.58 india?
|
|
By:
pitch is tuff
|
|
By:
5 over pp
|
|
By:
Go SL - sh*t-em !
|
|
By:
13 ticks for a 1 run over?!
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
2 tick every ball
|
|
By:
this is penic odd
|
