By my calculations they have to beat Sri Lanka by a run rate of 4.25. That means if they bat first they have to win by 213 runs(no chance) If they win the toss they surely have to field first. If they restrict Sri Lanka to 250 they have to get them in 27 overs, or 200 in 24 overs,150 in 21 overs. Realistically they will hope to be chasing less than 175.
footiefan - I missed most the game, came on to lay SL @ 1.18 earlier on while AUS were only 5 down.. stupid wickets theyve given away.. So I'm on AUS to win but its nothing major to be fair :) bet £50 to win £320 currently
footiefan - I missed most the game, came on to lay SL @ 1.18 earlier on while AUS were only 5 down.. stupid wickets theyve given away.. So I'm on AUS to win but its nothing major to be fair :) bet £50 to win £320 currently
tbh SL backers should have greened up earlier when the last wicket fell and SL went to 1.02 so all on board the OZZY train lol.. not often u get to back a team at 26/1 and they actually pull it off!
tbh SL backers should have greened up earlier when the last wicket fell and SL went to 1.02 so all on board the OZZY train lol.. not often u get to back a team at 26/1 and they actually pull it off!
The fact that they got so close is evidence to me that teams usually, either chasing or setting a target, place too much emphasis on keeping wickets in hand at the expense of the run rate. The Aussies did the opposite by an extreme extent because they had to and yet they were one dropped catch away from winning in the end. Losing wickets early on doesnt neccesarily mean you will get a low score. Although I never thought The Aussies would win the match because of the situation had they been only slightly more defensive they would have.
The fact that they got so close is evidence to me that teams usually, either chasing or setting a target, place too much emphasis on keeping wickets in hand at the expense of the run rate. The Aussies did the opposite by an extreme extent because the
very true aston. i suspect the correct tactics for 50 over cricket is to go hard at it from the outset, and keep going until very deep in it - particularly with the batting friendly constraints and the fact that 8, 9, 10 and 11 nowadays are pretty darn good. no team has the balls to do it though in a regular match
very true aston. i suspect the correct tactics for 50 over cricket is to go hard at it from the outset, and keep going until very deep in it - particularly with the batting friendly constraints and the fact that 8, 9, 10 and 11 nowadays are pretty da
My strategy would be if you need 5 an over, score 5 an over or a little bit more from the start, if you need 6 score 6 etc. If setting a target aim to be 50 after 10 overs,then if you dont lose any wickets try and get 60 off the next 10. If you lose 3 or 4 then 40 off the next 10. When chasing it doesnt matter if you lose wickets though as you still have to get the runs and not make it too difficult for the batters lower down.
My strategy would be if you need 5 an over, score 5 an over or a little bit more from the start, if you need 6 score 6 etc. If setting a target aim to be 50 after 10 overs,then if you dont lose any wickets try and get 60 off the next 10. If you lose