Cricket
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
At 1.57 India looks like a good lay. England innings 250+ is great value.
The best chance for visitors to grab a win is in mohali.
The best chance for visitors to grab a win is in mohali.
Show More
really want england to win this match , not cos of my pocket ,simply cos i want the next match at dharamsala to be the decider of this series
Morse u are a sicko...the fraud squad will get u...and if u are in Spain ...Dapper will get u.
You have a full bank on England Morse. Time to pipe down.
Cant help but see the irony in the top he is wearing.
Oh well, didn't hit the 1.20 I hoped for, but 1.25 good enough. 
Bowl him out, put this game to bed. 
Bowl him out, put this game to bed.
Problem here, is that Dhoni is in next, and the form player nearly in the world right now, and whoever he comes in to partner, is well set, seeing the ball well, and playing aggressively. Doesn't look good for England.
Tredwell getting what he deserves. **** looks older than my dead grandfather.
GET SH!TBACH OFF AND GET FINN ON.
jesus christ, cook's either a moron, or dernbach wasn't his selection.
jesus christ, cook's either a moron, or dernbach wasn't his selection.
Looking at the PP too. Could be carnage. They should take it here.
You kind of get used to him when you know whats going to happen
Still, ruins the match as contest and costs money in the long run (never mind England the match, but secondary concern to profit)
Still, ruins the match as contest and costs money in the long run (never mind England the match, but secondary concern to profit)
He will switch again soon and put his bank on India and be coining it in. Even though he lost half of it on India, and has the other half (theoretical of course) on England at 2.50.
I think a lay is in order though, they must be able to fluke a wicket from somewhere.
I think a lay is in order though, they must be able to fluke a wicket from somewhere.
too little too late , should have brought finn on 6 overs earlier
Think high and going down leg. Terrible decision for mine.
As I said, fluke a wicket.
As I said, fluke a wicket.
Would love Morse to post his book! I am sure he is on India if he isn't Walter Mittee
Look real big I think. Dhoni merely needs to see himself in and they are home. Determined to run themself out though by the looks.
These ****s appeal for anything. Missing off by plenty, and too high again. Get a grip.
England still in the game while Davis is at the wicket!
Dernbach 3, but I think he won't be seen again. Hopefully Patel gets to have another go for the PP against Dhoni and Raina. Need this to be over quick so I don't get tempted to green out. I want all this profit, not just some of it. Can't see England getting close any more.
The old PP always sees a wicket fall syndrome maybe? Don't think so here, I think they smash it.
Go away Cook you ****wit. The rule was made purely for this goose and your retard team that doesn't know where the stumps are.
Well ****, call it off and pay everybody out. Morse has spoken.
Finn 1 over left. Needs to claim 3 in that over, or it will be very tough for the others.
the law, not "rule" BJT, is about distracting the batsmen.
i think if raina had appealed the decision then it would be correct to call it dead, much in the same way that i don't think it should be caled dead if the batman smears him for 4.
it's about hindrance, and in that instance raina hadn't even noticed.
i think if raina had appealed the decision then it would be correct to call it dead, much in the same way that i don't think it should be caled dead if the batman smears him for 4.
it's about hindrance, and in that instance raina hadn't even noticed.
that's exactly where walt is wrong.
it is up to the batsman to decide what a distraction is. they are the ones being distracted or not ffs.
it is up to the batsman to decide what a distraction is. they are the ones being distracted or not ffs.
Its about learning how to bowl and stop disrupting the play. It was stated that the bails come off, it is a dead ball, regardless of anything else. That is it.
If he was hit for 6 it still would have been a dead ball. Has nothing to do with hinderance at all. How can you claim a batsmen was distracted by something and hit it for 6?
It should be a no ball, straight up. Batsmen gets runs and protects his wicket. No bowler over the age of 3 should be so uncoordinated to run into the stumps on their run up. It is ridiculous.
if he hits it for 6 it will be called a dead ball if he does the same again
well that's not in the law. that's merely the interpretation of the rule as it applies to finn. i would argue that it's a poor interpretation.
but given that he knows that how it's going to be interpreted, you are right, it should stop doing it.
but given that he knows that how it's going to be interpreted, you are right, it should stop doing it.
interpretation of the law (ffs - you've got me doing it now)
Is a simple case of the bowler is the one ****g up, so he should be the only one penalised for that delivery. The only way that happens is if it is a no ball.
why would Cook dispute the decision with the umpire?
Because he was desperate and knew none of his other bowlers will be able to get a wicket?
At the start of this series they stated every time it happened, dead ball. Previous to that I think they got a warning first. My guess, is that he was appealing that they didn't get a warning, and therefore it was unfair to take the wicket off them.
At a guess.
At a guess.
As for the rest, unless every time somebody goes out they look to the stumps at the bowlers end ready to complain they were distracted, it is easier just to have a no grey area rule. Stumps off, done deal. Dead ball not the right way, but black and white certainly is. As DStyle suggested, interpretations of rules aren't a good thing. (Paraphrasing, and maybe didn't state exactly as you would have liked). Unless of course it is consistant. Which in this case, it certainly is.
looks like u get all ur profit BJT , rewarded for having the nerve not to lay off , tricky one that , every trader has that issue , to lay off or not , lol
Losing your bank couldn't happen to a more irritating bloke Morse. You are the only person I would ever be saying this to, but I am happy you went broke.
And I say that knowing full well that you probably haven't put a bet on here since day 1 when you lost the lot.
And I say that knowing full well that you probably haven't put a bet on here since day 1 when you lost the lot.
Should just call it a no ball, a run to the batsman and if he scores runs he gets them and if he is out he is given not out.
wonder where the problem might be.....
ST Finn 10 1 39 1 3.90
TT Bresnan 8 1 48 1 6.00
JW Dernbach 7 0 50 0 7.14
SR Patel 3 0 21 0 7.00
JC Tredwell 8 0 42 2 5.25
JE Root 3 0 13 0 4.33
ST Finn 10 1 39 1 3.90
TT Bresnan 8 1 48 1 6.00
JW Dernbach 7 0 50 0 7.14
SR Patel 3 0 21 0 7.00
JC Tredwell 8 0 42 2 5.25
JE Root 3 0 13 0 4.33
Jan 23, 2013 -- 1:48PM, nicky27 wrote:
looks like u get all ur profit BJT , rewarded for having the nerve not to lay off , tricky one that , every trader has that issue , to lay off or not , lol
The plan certainly was to lay off. I figured I would ride the price in, lay off, then lay hard as the target looked good given how hard Eng made batting look. But the more the game went on, the more pathetic the English bowlers looked, and while Dhoni is yet to be given out, it is very hard to lay them, both because he is in great form, and the market loves him and moves it bulk while he is in there.
Not to mention I lost double what I won here on the Aus game so wanted to maximise this win.
And of course, now Dhoni goes out, to the most pathetic bowler in world cricket just to test my patience again. But Raina being there is good enough, and Jadeja good enough to see them home here with no pressure on. Will trade off a little though to reduce exposure.
News Update
Morse remortgages caravan to add to holdings on England!
Morse remortgages caravan to add to holdings on England!
Just woke up. Fcuk my eyes are sore.
Is morse broke again. Not another bank.
ECB aint in it.
Is morse broke again. Not another bank.
ECB aint in it.
Please, as if his grandmother would let a degenerate like him mortgage her caravan. No doubt she lives in there with him and sees his posts on here.
Interesting punditry from Colly
He thinks Dhoni's bandage has affected his tossing, some might say that tossing has effected a bandage!
He thinks Dhoni's bandage has affected his tossing, some might say that tossing has effected a bandage!
Jan 23, 2013 -- 1:56PM, peckerdunne wrote:
Just woke up. Fcuk my eyes are sore.Is morse broke again. Not another bank.ECB aint in it.
He did manage to fluke a 1.03 GSM call on Australia earlier though so unless he topped that 30 cents up on England he still has 3% of his bank left...
interesting strike rates over in corruption league.
a bowler disturbing the stumps on delivery should be given a no ball , so any runs accruing from that delivery count
Jan 23, 2013 -- 2:03PM, peckerdunne wrote:
interesting strike rates over in corruption league.
Will chase the 150 down in 10 overs at that rate. Crazy batting. Wish I was watching that rather than this puss.
L O L numptie knee lost 2....O M G Pick me off the floor why dont ye....
WTF? That should be perfectly fine. Was actually pretty clever.
Although I seem to recall Jason Gillespie getting pulled up for making funny faces and sticking his tongue out as he was running in. lol
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539