England Vs West Indies

eng is fav now

8 hours I have been going, gone for the rope to hang myself twice, and yet I am sitting on green for the day.  Only 220 odd, but **** me swinging, I have hung the boots up twice and near necked myself twice in both games.  **** the cricket, and will be back tomorrow for another go.... 

amazing !

never see wi field like this

money rain

every body bath money rain

66666666666666

Windies surely cant mug this up lol

2 more 6

666666666666666666

DLFDLFDLFDLFDLFDLF

its been done before many times

dot ball negates that 6

DOT
PIPE DOWN ENGLAND MUG BACKERS

exactly why morgan is coming in with so much little time is pathetic

666666666666

here we go

6 negates the dot

eng win must isay

Terrible bowling

DLFDLFDLFDLFDLFDLF

24 OFF 8 IS IMPOSSIBLE

one more 6 18 from 7 balls

England needed Bairstow to stedy the ship

Cell 1	Cell 2
Cell 3	Cell 4

23 OFF 7 IS IMPOSSIBLE

this is the ball right here! If england get a boundary this is theirs

if they get at least a 4 here, its theirs

tie 20/1 boys

19 from 6 is doable easy

23 OFF 6 IS IMPOSSIBLE

gsm

gsm

gsm

all over

23 off the last over req and 1.09

EASY EASY EASY
GAME SET AND MATCH TO WEST INDIES

no way, 3 6's and one four needed here

GSM

feel for these 2 tho.. openers let them down badly

Samuels!

samuels interesting

good effort by england all things considered

Samuels

samuel bowling! massive mistake by WI here!

Would have rather had sammy bowling

WEST INDIES ARE FREE MONEY

samuels is going to get knocked for 6's at least

kingmax
Date Joined: 29 Dec 09
Add contact | Send message
27 Sep 12 18:35
Joined:
29 Dec 09
| Topic/replies: 9,082 | Blogger: kingmax's blog
feel for these 2 tho.. openers let them down badly




Nothing to do with the openers they didnt waste any balls.

yuo know what i mean ffs

23 OFF 6 IS IMPOSSIBLE
HOPE THIS HELPS

no pace on the ball for the final over

wise move.

shocking fielding again

shocking?!

DOT

kingmax
27 Sep 12 18:36
Joined:
29 Dec 09
| Topic/replies: 9,083 | Blogger: kingmax's blog
yuo know what i mean ffs


Bairstows fault he was not opening.

good ball

over

lovely
i told you mugs .

DID. NOT. GREEN.

never in doubt after the first over of England's innings. Anyone who backed england after that is a mug and should give up betting on cricket...

wasn't worth 3 years off my life though

well done wi - eng didn't get going early enough should never lose woth all these wickets left.

i held my nerve but i was twitching.

That's the last time i'm following a morse tip!!

I'm one hell of a nervous wreck!!

Fair play to england great effort there, didn't think they would get anywhere close.

a better game than you might have hoped after the first over.

quite why you'd bring in bairstow before morgan is a mystery, suspect it's some bs about being a finisher.

and ffs, stop bowling shitbach at the death. he isn't good enough.

most 6666666's tied

I need a drink.

such a poor start in the power play cost eng, an average powerr play and they woulda won cosily.on the brighhtside i think we know morgan will be coming in before the inept bairstow.dot dot dot 4 is no good , rampaul  ripping the openers out is worrying (im 52  and fat and id hit rampaul out of the ground).at least england showed that narine  is workable for 8 an over .spin  hasnt caused the down fall today , straight up n down med pace wobblers from rampaull did tho.it didnt help drenbach having a bad day with the ball (hes usually very good to be fair).windies and other teams get their best batters in early  , i think we will be doing so from now on.

@ Sudoku ... never follow a guy like Morse ... he hasn't got a clue what he is talking about ... the other day he was telling people to back everton @1.14 .... that it was a guaranteed dead cert ... needless to say it all went pear shaped for anyone who listended to him ... I went long England big time when they were @1.04 and greened out when they were at 1.24 ... best day I've had in a while and with low risk ... IMO a much much better trade than backing a short odds 'dead cert' with large amounts ...

having said all that    gayle doesnt always come off, if hed have holed out early(has done many times beforE) eng would been chasing a far more moderate total .i for one have not given up hope with eng.

Good man morse

Thanks for the tip

Sep 27, 2012 -- 6:51PM, RajaFiaz wrote:

@ Sudoku ... never follow a guy like Morse ... he hasn't got a clue what he is talking about ... the other day he was telling people to back everton @1.14 .... that it was a guaranteed dead cert ... needless to say it all went pear shaped for anyone who listended to him ... I went long England big time when they were @1.04 and greened out when they were at 1.24 ... best day I've had in a while and with low risk ... IMO a much much better trade than backing a short odds 'dead cert' with large amounts ...

It's all about value.  Backing low odds isn't necessarily a bad strategy. i.e. I was laying 210 and 220 runs in the WI innings at 5 and 7 and these came off easily.

Whats the point in having your best player sat watching for 10 overs ?

Oh i know that raja, only on this occasion i found myself to be agreeing with him!

Broke all the rules i set myself in this, luckily it came off. Although yours was rationally the play to make, wd.

there lies the difference raj , your using in running opinion to profit , morse just goes for any long odds on chance he can ,(obviously  a team whose got way to a good start) in the long term raj im sure you outperform mors/clown.

Sep 27, 2012 -- 6:53PM, nigelpm1 wrote:

Sep 27, 2012 --  6:51PM, RajaFiaz wrote:@ Sudoku ... never follow a guy like Morse ... he hasn't got a clue what he is talking about ... the other day he was telling people to back everton @1.14 .... that it was a guaranteed dead cert ... needless to say it all went pear shaped for anyone who listended to him ... I went long England big time when they were @1.04 and greened out when they were at 1.24 ... best day I've had in a while and with low risk ... IMO a much much better trade than backing a short odds 'dead cert' with large amounts ...It's all about value.  Backing low odds isn't necessarily a bad strategy. i.e. I was laying 210 and 220 runs in the WI innings at 5 and 7 and these came off easily.

Great comment about value. And we make a market because everyone has different opinions about 'value'.

Sep 27, 2012 -- 6:54PM, sickoflayinwinners wrote:

there lies the difference raj , your using in running opinion to profit , morse just goes for any long odds on chance he can ,(obviously

I disagree if you pick your "dead certs" right you can still make money by losing the odd one.

nigel , i agree its possible to back longs on chances   and win , but thosde odds on chances must still be value i.e  represent shorter prices than youre taking , morse wouldnt  know "value "if it bit  him on on  b9m. hes does tho know if something is 1.14 it will win morse times than lose and for someone as clueless as him   thats as good as it gets.as we all know whether you bet long odds on   or long odds against  all that you need to show a profit longterm is for those bets  to have  greater chance of copping than the priceyou get.of course this aint easy to do or wed all be millionaires.the problem morse has , he backs things simply BECAUSE they are odds on and seems to have no understanding of what prices things shopuld be.

Of course - that's the game!

i must add  im not a great odds on bettor myself as it doesnt suit my general style of punting.i know for sure i react badly to betting odds losers so i try avoid it as much as poss. i have no dounbt ive let many good value odds on chances go by but d personally let a 1/3 chance i fancy win without my cash on it than find myself joining in  at odds on and being wrong(cos we all are plenty often enuff)

jesus wept, how have none of you realised yet? Morse either does the opposite to what he posts or doesn't do it at all, people take him far too seriously on here. he's just having a laugh on here and finds it ridiculously easy to get a bite

yes its possible hes just an attention seeking saddo buteither way hes a total tw4t

Sep 27, 2012 -- 8:38PM, cnman wrote:

jesus wept, how have none of you realised yet? Morse either does the opposite to what he posts or doesn't do it at all, people take him far too seriously on here. he's just having a laugh on here and finds it ridiculously easy to get a bite

I'm not so sure.  He tends to be right most of the time (as you'd expect backing low odds) - will do an analysis for fun.

Does anyone know a way of seeing every post a forum poster has made historically?

i reckon we should get crunchy on the case. 

An indepth analysis of the calls of morse with a level£100 stake the moment he mentions ''free money'' or ''coining it in you mugs''.

Could take a while!

Would be awesome though - please do it - only trouble is finding the odds as well?

http://zaryab1.com/cricket-highlights/england-vs-west-indies-highlights-t20-world-cup-2012-super-8/

With the "man" commentating - Waaaaallllopppp!!

imagine a whole ipl season with lloydy....

waaaaaaaallllloooooooopppppppppppppppppp,  listening to like 600 waaaaaalllloooooppppppsssss.

and with the indian girls - he'd be in heaven - the schoolboy humour is tremendous.

england are pathetic falling 17 runs short against a crap bowling attack

and kiewswetter is a pathetic opening batsman, and one of the worse keepers to have played for england, other people deserve a chance now like phil mustard and tim ambrose