|
By:
Theyre about an over short of 160 here.
|
|
By:
salman is predicting negna win but reckons Uva will score high first, then lay them. Doesn't look like it, 23 dot balls so far. Maybe they'll get more aggressive now. Might have been cautious after early wicket?
|
|
By:
No, he is usually wrong anyway. They should score an average score, and then what you bet on is anyone's guess.
|
|
By:
negna are thru to semis win or lose
|
|
By:
Uva's odds are dropping but we are not seeing corresponding rises in Nag's odds - maybe it's just an adjustment towards normalisation
|
|
By:
That is true, they dont need the win, but they will want to go into those with a win.
|
|
By:
no max this market looks cross-matched to me?
|
|
By:
53/1 after 8. i can take 1.57 green now lol
|
|
By:
They keep giving them extras thats why.
|
|
By:
Uva still big i reckon
|
|
By:
true. loads of dot balls and extras
|
|
By:
The familiar 6/4 and 4/6 odds have appeared
|
|
By:
4
|
|
By:
let me know if ur watching so i can stop annoying you with commentary!
|
|
By:
Developing the partnership here, so it could be dangerous.
|
|
By:
Nags odds have moved out of the c.1.55 doldrums
|
|
By:
haven't followed salman or cricket for long but he seems to get it right in most matches?
|
|
By:
110/3 from 14 = 170. That is what I judge these matches by.
|
|
By:
No, he is wrong most of the time lurka.
|
|
By:
Am watching now, thanks Lurka
|
|
By:
why judge it on that SoA? what if more/less runs/wickets? what about run rate? I know having more wickets left means they can go for it more later. 110 from 14 is 7.85 RR
|
|
By:
just trying to learn more, not questioning!
|
|
By:
because that is a good score to work around. If they are say, 95/2 from 12, you can say that they are on target for around 110 from 14, but with an extra wicket, so should score just over 170. If for 4, just under, for example.
|
|
By:
in the green zone nicely now
|
|
By:
Run rate is actually not that important in T20. What is important is the timing of the wickets. If there is a wicket in the powerplay, it will stunt the run rate and slow them down. If there is a wicket just after the first six overs, less important, and should affect the odds less, because the chances are that they were going to slow down then anyway.
|
|
By:
yeah i get you, there was a wicket on 1.6 here and i think they were cautious not to lose another soon after. Is that right?
|
|
By:
I dont know, depends on the team strategy.
|
|
By:
on course for 150+ now
|
|
By:
At the moment, with this score, I would think like this - they are four overs away from 14 overs. At 7 an over they'll be just over 100 runs. But they have two wickets to spare from that score that I assess this by, so they should be getting 160s-170s, but that will be less if they do not score at 7 an over, or if they lose another wicket before then.
|
|
By:
super 6. cheers for the insight
|
|
By:
If they got to 110 without losing another wicket, before the 14th over, bigger than 170 is likely.
|
|
By:
prices about right now
|
|
By:
I'd go upper 170s at the moment.
|
|
By:
Good write ups SOA Thanks
|
|
By:
but now, just scraping 170.
|
|
By:
run out, jumped out to 2.0 then straight back into 1.85 again, where they were
|
|
By:
Not sure why, its just Chanderpaul coming in to bat.
|
|
By:
onto the tennis for me.
|
|
By:
yeah i might join you. good luck
|
|
By:
Bartoli, 1.05. Free money.
|