|
By:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snickometer - scientific evidence mate!
|
|
By:
why has nobody looked at hotspot?
|
|
By:
No evidence at all if the sound didnt occur at the correct time.
|
|
By:
pattinson could have reviewed it as well
|
|
By:
200 would be a defendable score from 50 overs here. So, 140 should be defendable in reduced overs.
|
|
By:
given some early wickets, at least.
|
|
By:
Poor umpiring pressured into it by the England players this is not good enough from Australia and not really in the nature of the sport either
|
|
By:
6!
|
|
By:
this is a bigger score than they should have had five overs ago.
|
|
By:
poor from cook, bopara bowling better than broad tonight but sticks to forumla
|
|
By:
pitch looks fine to me.. just piss poor batting..
|
|
By:
yeah, was always going to be frantic in the last five overs
|
|
By:
145/7.
|
|
By:
41 from 4 overs.
|
|
By:
200 would be a defendable score from 50 overs here.
![]() maybe if england were defending it against this awful australian side. |
|
By:
50 short at least
|
|
By:
SoA you are the biggest ramper on here. Give up and accept you've lost here. 200 in 50 overs would not be defendable, did you watch the last match? 146 in 32 overs is even easier than that
|
|
By:
I can see England 120/7 with two overs to bat.
|
|
By:
If that's what you think cnman, plough into England at 1.2s.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
how long is the break?
|
|
By:
20 Minutes
|
|
By:
S or A is either a fool or a troll. i've always veered towards the latter.
|
|
By:
CMM on the move.
|
|
By:
I don't need to SoA, i've got a nice enough green on them already. This Australia attack is really really poor, especially without Lee and Watson. On what basis do you think England will struggle here?
|
|
By:
anything can happen of course but DL may intervene anyway
|
|
By:
Because Australia are fielding three spin bowlers. This wicket will suit them.
|
|
By:
Wonder if CMM is folks giving themselves insurance
|
|
By:
even Alec Stewart, not my favourite pundit, but knows his cricket, thinks Australia have a good chance.
|
|
By:
odds on match not to be completed has shortened a fair bit.
|
|
By:
hows the radar looking?
|
|
By:
6/1 an hour ago, now 3/1
|
|
By:
clear
|
|
By:
i am tempted to pile into england at 1.2 but will wait and see how this goes.
|
|
By:
They have a chance yes certainly but England are big favs here, the point will be early wickets something they haven't managed yet if they get that well then you never know
|
|
By:
I'm tempted to pile into CMM - looks to me like cheap insurance policies
|
|
By:
whats cmm?
|
|
By:
completed match market (thats in cricket betting terms)
|
|
By:
How many overs constitute a game now please? On the assumption that in a 20/20 it's 5 overs,and a 40/40 it's 10,does this 32 over-game become 8 ?
|
|
By:
20
|