Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 382 comments are related to the topic:
England v Australia 5th ODI, at Old Trafford

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 10  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 10 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 382
By:
nicky27
When: 10 Jul 12 17:25
where have u been eckers ?? haven't seen you for ages
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
When: 10 Jul 12 17:38
I think England should have batted first.
By:
kingmax
When: 10 Jul 12 17:39
forrest & bailey are pants... eng should be 1.2 here, if warner goes this is over, kaput!!
By:
DStyle
When: 10 Jul 12 17:39
Srichaphan or Ancic? 10 Jul 12 17:38 
I think England should have batted first.


you couldn't make it up.

from a guy who's recently been criticising D/L.
By:
trevortricky
When: 10 Jul 12 17:41
how many over match is it now
By:
nicky27
When: 10 Jul 12 17:41
32 overs each trevor ( if no further rain interventions )
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
When: 10 Jul 12 17:42
Never underestimate Australia, in any sport.
By:
trevortricky
When: 10 Jul 12 17:42
ty
By:
DStyle
When: 10 Jul 12 17:43
warner utterly hopeless.
By:
kingmax
When: 10 Jul 12 17:43
hahah cabr score a run.... bye bye oz
By:
trevortricky
When: 10 Jul 12 17:44
need to be a bit more proactive the aussies imho
By:
Ekbalco
When: 10 Jul 12 17:45
Too busy with my spreadsheets to sully my hands with the Forum nickers.

Keeping an eye on you all mind - the quality of poster not improving.
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 10 Jul 12 17:45
OK having watched the opening overs I *DO REGRET* getting on Aus at North of 2.5, I should have been looking for North of 3.0........................never mind that boundary helped! Still Time!
By:
Injera
When: 10 Jul 12 17:49
Toss was crucial Cardinal.
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
When: 10 Jul 12 17:50
Anyone putting money on England at 1.4s could be getting themselves in a muddle.
By:
kingmax
When: 10 Jul 12 17:52
why... 9 from thr pp... oz are pathetic
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
When: 10 Jul 12 17:52
England will be no different here. It is about wickets at the moment.
By:
kingmax
When: 10 Jul 12 17:53
no different? like the lat game u mean?
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
When: 10 Jul 12 17:53
No relevance to this.
By:
Ekbalco
When: 10 Jul 12 17:54
36/0 wood be a brilliant start hear imv.

A long way off mind.
By:
Ekbalco
When: 10 Jul 12 17:54
*36/0 after 12
By:
cnman
When: 10 Jul 12 17:57
SoA, on what basis do you think England should have batted first here? Given that the ball is swinging around a lot early, batting is likely to become easier as the pitch dries out and that there may be further reductions, and D/L suits the side batting last
By:
lustrumm
When: 10 Jul 12 17:57
I think S or A is confused and to be fair I had to have Duckworth Lewis explained to me as well one time. wickets re irrelevant in the first innings if (and we must assume) Australia play their 32 Overs.

I am not watching this live so can't comment on conditions but a run rate of 2 after 6 overs in a shortened game is insane.

Since I started typing this they seem to be trying to pick it up a bit now their play in the first 6 innings is inexplicable imo
By:
Ekbalco
When: 10 Jul 12 17:57
A 100% bowl first toss.
By:
Mariner Paul
When: 10 Jul 12 17:58
Unbelievable that there hasn't been a wicket yet!
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
When: 10 Jul 12 17:58
What I meant is it is important for them not to chuck their wickets away. They know that if they bat for long enough, they can afford to smash it around, as there will be less risk of their team being bowled out, even if they get out.
By:
Ekbalco
When: 10 Jul 12 17:59
Only hope for Oz is to get Cook/Bell/Trott out of their comfort zones by setting more than a run a ball.
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
When: 10 Jul 12 17:59
It seems unlikely from the radar, that this will be affected by the weather, at least for this innings.
By:
lustrumm
When: 10 Jul 12 18:03
FWIW I think Australian cause is lost already after acting the eejit for the first 6 overs. Granted losing the toss again just plain unlucky but to only get 13 runs in the first 6 overs is insane in a game that could end up very short.

did they forget it is only a 32 over game ?
By:
Injera
When: 10 Jul 12 18:04
Cook yet another mug skipper. That was a second slip catch and yet Cook has to have his default field setting.Cry
By:
nicky27
When: 10 Jul 12 18:04
hey S or A , thanks for organising the wimbledon comp !!  got squeezed out the frame by the TB question Sad if murray had won , i would have grabbed second spotDevil
By:
Ekbalco
When: 10 Jul 12 18:05
Him and Strauss are reactive captains - the best are instinctive.
Early days but Cook does not appear to have the instinct.
By:
Injera
When: 10 Jul 12 18:06
Very few do Ek. Very depressing. One area of the game that's going backwards fast.
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
When: 10 Jul 12 18:06
yep you were in with a chance.
By:
nicky27
When: 10 Jul 12 18:06
quite extraordinary how australia are without loss here
By:
nicky27
When: 10 Jul 12 18:07
look forward to forrest's strike rate here Laugh
By:
kingmax
When: 10 Jul 12 18:09
how are oz sp here..?
By:
Injera
When: 10 Jul 12 18:10
Because they should be 2 down and are not. 175 is competitive.
By:
kingmax
When: 10 Jul 12 18:10
what.. well there not 2 down are they..
By:
Ekbalco
When: 10 Jul 12 18:11
How poor does Wade look?
Page 3 of 10  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 10 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com