Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 203 comments are related to the topic:
Delhi daredevils vs Rajasthan royals sunday's 1st game
Delhi daredevils vs Rajasthan royals sunday's 1st game
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 203
|
By:
Total risk free cricket from RR...this is a good chase set up by them...rates are about right now.
|
|
By:
RR looking comfortable, at the moment.
|
|
By:
I agree, but wickets could change that as they are not ahead of the required rate
|
|
By:
Right. Solid start is likely to be enough but who knows?
|
|
By:
Yup wickets change the equation always..lets see how they go from here..for now they are in control.
|
|
By:
yes, they have to keep the Required RR around 7 else wicket will change the equation and that will allow Delhi to come back into the game. next 2 overs is very important
|
|
By:
They are at 7...which gives them 140 at end of 20..they need 12 more some where and with wickets in hand i think they would get through..as said...Delhi bowling aint no superclass bowling.
|
|
By:
Rajasthan need 86 runs in 60 balls. 8 out of 10times, it is a easy chase especially when they have all 10 wickets in hand. but that doesn't mean they can they it for long, they have to take charge and move the run rate.
|
|
By:
At the outset, the run rate (to win) was 7.65 per over. It's now (at the halfway stage) 8.60.
|
|
By:
Rajasthan need 86 runs in 60 balls. 8 out of 10times, it is a easy chase especially when they have all 10 wickets in hand. but that doesn't mean they can leave it for long, they have to take charge and move the run rate.
|
|
By:
Confirmed.
|
|
By:
8.60 with so many wickets in hand should be easy. RR are a big price imo.
|
|
By:
Agreed
|
|
By:
Dravid to retire hurt?
|
|
By:
good, brings Shah in?
|
|
By:
Market's not fazed by the events.
|
|
By:
Dravid might do well to retire here..not worth making that injury worse..!!!
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Dravid has given away his wicket mentally..i think he is going to open up now...!!!
|
|
By:
looks like a train
|
|
By:
Why do they always seem to want to take the match to the last over? Wickets in hand, smash the ball and get it down with overs to spare ffs.
|
|
By:
How many times did a twenty/20 game be lost by a chasing side that never lost a wicket in the chase?
I was just about to submit that question and then a wicket fell! |
|
By:
Yeahh they are delaying this for too late...should speed up now and take themselves home.
|
|
By:
Its as if theyve been 'told' to make it entertaining.
|
|
By:
Exactly...
|
|
By:
Yeah SoA they are making it interesting...wonder if they required that..I wonder if the last over is going to come to haunt them now.
|
|
By:
Whats entertaining for the crowd is stressful for the punter.
|
|
By:
Which may explain why a few appear to be short - tempered
|
|
By:
Yeahh exactly...i am now on RR..so Ihope they dont mug is up now..
|
|
By:
out me thinks
|
|
By:
interesting that 15 million matched despite not on UK TV.
|
|
By:
I doubt they will lose from here, but you never know.
|
|
By:
That was a six from Rahane to my eye.
|
|
By:
Me too, Payal. I placed, belatedly, a fair chunk on RR. A subsequent cover keeps the ulcer quiet.
|
|
By:
The person who put £130,000 on them a while ago is confident, at least.
|
|
By:
Someone should tell Hodge he was not brought in ahead of Shah to hit singles.
|
|
By:
Wish I had it to put on. Eighteen years as a company director and seeing money I'd put in to help try to keep a medium-sized company afloat has made me more cautious.
|
|
By:
Yes, it sank with the company at the end of 2009.
|
|
By:
That was a conversation killer. My apologies!
|
|
By:
I cant converse on here much today, too many sports and bets going on.
|