|
By:
they should? not often that score is chased at this ground.
|
|
By:
180 + backers feeling a touch nervous
|
|
By:
not now theyre not.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
66666666666666666666666 never in doubt
|
|
By:
Your taking for granted that they'll bat well, GRANTICKING. Runs have to be scored. Thye dont score themselves
|
|
By:
I think PWI need 200 here, slightly short imo
|
|
By:
I use stats not my own presumptions on how good the players are based on reputation. Far easier and less likely to go wrong I think.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
And we've seenall sorts that can go wrong = decent runs on the board usually wins
|
|
By:
Why, Chelsea? Because of the match earlier today at a different ground?
|
|
By:
lol wind your neck in RJB we can all have our view/opinion here
|
|
By:
looking like 190
|
|
By:
Yeah, I'm all for free speech. But if you come out with bollox expect to be knocked down.
|
|
By:
and why is that bollox please?
![]() |
|
By:
190+
|
|
By:
not a bad thing chasing on this ground, small ground, its a boundary hitting ground........9 an over is not impossible here
|
|
By:
mistaken. Thought there was another over left!!
|
|
By:
You won't see Gayle running like that.
|
|
By:
chelsea_blue • April 17, 2012 4:58 PM BST
I think PWI need 200 here, slightly short imo ------------------------------------------ Because 160+ is a good score at this ground and defendable... |
|
By:
PWI have been top edging them for 6 all day, RCB could make mincemeat of this 180 odd
|
|
By:
pune have thrown this away big time
|
|
By:
should have had a fair bit more. need a 666666666
|
|
By:
fine for me tho im on rcb
![]() |
|
By:
"Could" isn't the same as "will"! You should not confuse your future and conditional tenses...
|
|
By:
2 wickets in any two over period will kill RCB. I thgink it'll happen.
|
|
By:
oh so it is an exact science that the ground dictates a good score?
now what you have sai.... -that is complete bollox sir ![]() |
|
By:
and also Bangalore's strength is in its batting (Gayle, De Villiers, Dilshan, Kohli) more so than its bowling
|
|
By:
wicket factor has proven to be overrated this year. Bowling well or batting well is far more important.
|
|
By:
182. Should win with that. I did post the scores from this ground in a previous Bangalore match. I can't be bothered to find them, but if someone wants to post them, go ahead.
|
|
By:
Chelsea-blue. You are an idiot, which I should have guessed from you moniker since you clearly support a football club that has helped to destroy a once-noble working class sport in this country...
|
|
By:
Tough to chase 183, sticking with Poontang here.
Hopefully early wickets on the agenda. |
|
By:
give him some slck, RJB - he's only been a fan the last 6 years
|
|
By:
182 is easily defendable. Forget the RR/DC scores earlier today. Those were made at a different ground...
|
|
By:
how can you leave him out on his birthday...
|
|
By:
oh ffs RJB pull your head in from your arse your boring mate, I hope you green up from your odds on back of PWI I really do
![]() |
|
By:
when he has whisky and hoes to get through?
|
|
By:
PW will be disappointed there. 172 average, but I think this was definately 180 minimum. Think they get this. Batting certainly easier with the hard ball, get somebody with a start and this gets chased. Surprisingly enough I think the value lies with RCB here. Probably the first time I have been able to say that. Not much value mind you, but these odds drop quick here. 40+ without loss after 5 and they see 1.60 here..
|
|
By:
early wicket for Bangalore (first 3-4 overs) will see around 1.70 for Pune
cant see this being a train, will be good trading value either way |
|
By:
They won't be 40/0 from 5, probably 40/2 from about 7.
|