Kingmax. If you bet a penny with the Martingale system and keep doubling your stake when you lose, if you have a losing streak as long as a month you will have gone through a million pounds.
I just get the impression that some punters on Betfair don't realise this, which is why some of the flipflopping can be so extreme...
Kingmax. If you bet a penny with the Martingale system and keep doubling your stake when you lose, if you have a losing streak as long as a month you will have gone through a million pounds.I just get the impression that some punters on Betfair don't
nug market rules stipulate that Australia must be favourites for all cricket world cups, no matter where they take place.
I'd fancy Pakistan myself but will be interested to see how Englands bowlers get on in the tests.
Windies in a great position here, defend this and they can't lose the series which is more than they would have hoped for at the start.
nug market rules stipulate that Australia must be favourites for all cricket world cups, no matter where they take place.I'd fancy Pakistan myself but will be interested to see how Englands bowlers get on in the tests.Windies in a great position here
these people that criticise Sammys individual stats need to take a look at WI results before he became captain and after. They also need to look at matches he influences. WI way better with him than without him
these people that criticise Sammys individual stats need to take a look at WI results before he became captain and after. They also need to look at matches he influences. WI way better with him than without him
there are too many people attached to stats from an era when test cricket dominated the game. I heard someone the other day quote a No6's ODI average - totally irrelevant - strike rate is what you want to look at
there are too many people attached to stats from an era when test cricket dominated the game. I heard someone the other day quote a No6's ODI average - totally irrelevant - strike rate is what you want to look at
I'm saying you cant just take a one dimensional look at averages. Someone lower down that is capable of scoring 20 of 8 balls is a valuable commodity for the two most popular forms of the game. So if his average is 15 - who cares; it's irrelevant.
I'm saying you cant just take a one dimensional look at averages. Someone lower down that is capable of scoring 20 of 8 balls is a valuable commodity for the two most popular forms of the game. So if his average is 15 - who cares; it's irrelevant.
Do I think Sammy is a top notch all round cricketer - no. DO I think he is a good test cricketer - no. Do I think his contribution is capable of winning a limited overs match - yes. Do I think he is capable of scoring at 175 strike rate plus - yes. Do I think he is a good West Indies captain - yes
Do I think Sammy is a top notch all round cricketer - no.DO I think he is a good test cricketer - no.Do I think his contribution is capable of winning a limited overs match - yes.Do I think he is capable of scoring at 175 strike rate plus - yes.Do I
I didnt say batting averages were irrelevant - I said too many people were attached to stats - especially in limited overs. Obviously a test average of 50 means something.
I didnt say batting averages were irrelevant - I said too many people were attached to stats - especially in limited overs. Obviously a test average of 50 means something.
Aus looks tempting at 3.1 now... Over to over comparision shows that WI hardly scored at over 4 till 40th over.. Aus ahead in runs... but 2 wickets more than WI at this stage of match...!!!
Aus looks tempting at 3.1 now... Over to over comparision shows that WI hardly scored at over 4 till 40th over.. Aus ahead in runs... but 2 wickets more than WI at this stage of match...!!!