Feb 5, 2012 -- 7:28PM, screaming from beneaththewaves wrote:
Yes, you can't argue with the STATS, diktat.For instance, when England cruised to 315-4 to beat Australia at Headingley in 2001, there's no way they could have gone on to get 324 if needed. And, of course, all their other successful 4th-innings chases of lower targets would have gone the same way if extended to 324. The STATS say so. 324 is a mystical target, in the face of which wickets would have suddenly tumbled every time if they had needed to chase this extraordinary number.
of course its possible but which players will get the runs? forget Cook, Bell and Morgan. Strauss or KP will need to get a big hundred if England have any chance and I just can't see that happening England have done nothing to suggest that they can get anywhere near this score, I will be amazed if they got 200. have people just forgotten about 72 all out?? . I make Pak at 1.25 here not 1.45.