Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
11 Jun 20
19:07
Joined:
Date Joined:
17 Jun 11
10k a month for 30 years?
seems strange to me, why drip feed someone 3.6 million for that long, why not just pay out the full amount, I'm assuming there's a catch, such as if you die long before time the money stops and doesn't go to next of kin or something, I'd imagine the average age of a lottery player is 40 or something, maybe that's what they're bargaining on ? winner dying before time. Would help the economy with a lump sum as you can quickly put the money into various industries, buying a home, buying a car etc
bought a ticket for the first time anyway
probably the last
seems strange to me, why drip feed someone 3.6 million for that long, why not just pay out the full amount, I'm assuming there's a catch, such as if you die long before time the money stops and doesn't go to next of kin or something, I'd imagine the average age of a lottery player is 40 or something, maybe that's what they're bargaining on ? winner dying before time. Would help the economy with a lump sum as you can quickly put the money into various industries, buying a home, buying a car etc
bought a ticket for the first time anyway
probably the last
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539