white liberals and black voters

I'm pointing out what's been obvious to me from day 1 - that white liberals, SJWs, and the white elites (Democrats) don't give a flying f*** about black lives.

They are the real racists here, a sinister form of patronising, sneering, moral-high ground taking racism that allows them to lecture black people on their oppression,
and in the case of the elites, to win their votes.

I think it was pointed out on here that 0.2% of the population protested. That shows how much most of us actually care I think.

Platini,


Politician are lying two faced self serving people, that is not news.


What's your actual point and is it relevant?

if so, say why is it relevant?

a generalisation is by its nature 'sweeping'.

blm say nowt when black people kill black people, as they do in huge numbers in all major u.s. cities. those lives dont matter. nor do the lives of those killed by police in the windies, in numbers that are 50 times worse than the u.s. jamaican police appear even more racist.

fyi 25% of people killed by u.s. plod are black, and blm will say the black population is 13%. but 39% of murders and 55% of robberies are committed by black people, so they are far more likely to end up in custody. so, its contact with plod that should be looked at, not absolute numbers, and by that criterion, blm have no case.

nobody can deliver equality. there are some in society that will excel in certain areas, and some in others. should there be a quota for non-black sports people? those of asian origin are over-represented in medicine and accountancy. jewish people in law and performing arts. chinese people in i.t. you could go on and on. trying to achieve an exact balance is impossible and undesirable.

all you can do is attain equality of opportunity, which the u.s. does better than most. obarmy was a nobody with no money and place in the political squirearchy, yet he became a 2-term president. this would never have happened anywhere else.

all the garbage you watch on telly, all the gadgets you use, all the drivel you post online was created by people free to exercise their imagination and unrestricted by govt. interference. why didnt russia or china or india come up with apple or microsoft or twitter,etc?


and to answer your question, im reasonably intelligent, and can well understand why people are 'protesting on the streets recently'. they are fools.

Some forumites here must have a box set of the Black & White Minstrel show stashed away in their cupboard.

Some forumites here will aslo have heavily thumbed copies of Charles Murray's The Bell Curve as well as those box sets of The Black & White Minstrel Show.

Cardinal, you're right its not cos they're badder. Its their culture thats the issue.
A culture that means they are far far more likely to grow up in fatherless homes
A culture that sneers at educational achievement and prefers to glorify gangs, guns, crime and violence.

The Chicago stats are evidence enough, but there are plenty more examples.

A culture that sneers at educational achievement and prefers to glorify gangs, guns, crime and violence.


...yeah...uhm...

ffs grappler ye grand ol' quisling. No besmirching and belittling your countrymen when you have a German right at your disposal. Unity, dude!

If you hate this "degraded country" so much, why don't you just leave?

because business and family are here and neither will move. but i have a plan....

Many of the most respected and beloved institutions the world has ever seen are from the UK. From Oxbridge, to the BBC as the most respected news organisation of the entire planet, to the Rolling Stones and Mr. Bean.

There is no country the size of the UK that has positively influenced the world as much as the UK has and continues to do.

shut up you bore. dont try to be mr.understandingandreasonablegerman.

And hey there jolly!

Grappler, what makes the UK so degraded in your opinion?

What music/bands and TV shows do you enjoy?

Wheter you like them personally or not, the BBC simply is, by far, the most well-respected, jealousy-inducing broadcaster and news organisation on the planet.

it's well respected much more outside of the UK than it is in the UK.

In the UK most find as the years have gone by it has become more and more less relevant and less important, which it has because of mass media and more choices.

It is also disliked by many inside the UK because of the Television license which a lot of people resent, a recent pool showed 60% of people want it scrapped whilst half believe it does not provide value for money. Depends how you look at, works out to around 40p a day, but if you do not watch the BBC at all than it's very poor value, most people I know barely watch it. It's been replaced by the growth of the internet, Netflix, youtube etc. It's not longer the go to source of info and entertainment it once was, a TV tax is very dated and that's partly why it's valued more outside of the UK than in because you don't pay for use of the BBC overseas, it's free.

A good example is their prime time TV slot, which is still predominantly Eastenders most days of the week, they had some episodes near on 30 million 30 years ago, around 15-20 years ago averaging 12-15 mil, now it's around 5 mil, one episode last summer something like 1.6 mil tuned in.

They are not irrelevant, but in this day and age you should not be forced to pay for them which everyone who wants a tv, which is everyone, does.

Their sports offering are also quite poor, hence the recent promoting of women's sports when previously they did not care.