Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 264 comments are related to the topic:
statue in Bristol has been torn down and thrown into the harbour

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 6 of 7  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 264
By:
Magic__Daps
When: 08 Jun 20 21:42
mukdahan - I think you maybe right there.


Compared to Escobar now.... Jeez - you have even just said "a billionaire at death all through criminal activity". Can you not see where the comparisons fall down.


What Colston done some 350 years ago was deemed acceptable at the time, it has nothing to do with what you, me, or anyone else think is morally acceptable now.
By:
mukdahan
When: 08 Jun 20 21:48
Slaves were treated a 100 times better in Liverpool, London and Bristol than they were in the plantations in America and the West Indies where they were imported from, many families can still trace their roots back to mid 17 th century.
By:
darren_discombobulates_sports
When: 08 Jun 20 21:54
killing nearly 100,000 people has never been acceptable to the masses at any time only the elite few who stood to gain great personal wealth that found it acceptable, it is literally the weakest argument I've ever heard. Most people in Britain at that time were extremely poor and took what was offered to them because the welfare state did not exist then, accepting the benefits of slave trading is not the same as accepting what happened from a moral point of view. They could not afford to have morals.
By:
darren_discombobulates_sports
When: 08 Jun 20 21:55
a slave is a slave is a slave, talking about levels of treatment is laughable.
By:
Magic__Daps
When: 08 Jun 20 21:58
Jimmy Saville + Escobar = Colston


Right - I'm out.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 08 Jun 20 22:07
Don't forget mandela
By:
mukdahan
When: 08 Jun 20 22:08
So define what a slave is if we had lived just over 100 years ago the British government could have conscripted us sent us to war where we would have had a 40% chance of being killed or seriously injured were we slaves to our government and why did the masses allow millions to die we little or no complaint.
By:
mukdahan
When: 08 Jun 20 22:12
You live in a fantasy world where you think the masses care about each other most people care about there own lives and families thats what important to them and thats why you will always have massive injustices in this world.
By:
boxingthefox
When: 08 Jun 20 22:16
Great thread, and up to now has been very civil given this is such an emotive subject. Wink
By:
darren_discombobulates_sports
When: 08 Jun 20 22:18
they don't equal Colston, but the similarities/comparisons are quite obvious and simple. You're not comparing their acts, i.e. a sexual offender to a slave trader to a drug dealer, you are drawing parallels between the way in which they all tried justified their terrible crimes (either to themselves or the public), by giving to needy/less well off in society. Though I doubt any of them were trying to atone for their sins, as their primary aim was to serve themselves.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 08 Jun 20 22:18
modern day slavery in Bangladesh from where we get our clothing ..but almost encouraged today
By:
Coachbuster
When: 08 Jun 20 22:46
Bristol's very own Det Eddie Shoestring on the case of the missing Bristol slave trader Laugh
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 09 Jun 20 01:05
Sad to see people defending Jimmy Saville because he raised money for charity.
By:
boxingthefox
When: 09 Jun 20 02:16
Well I'm off to bed now, WD you're very selective in your recollections. here's an idea try being kinder to fellow forum posters, you might actually like it. A totally foreign concept I know. but give it a go, and stop projecting your anger on to others. HTH
By:
potlis
When: 09 Jun 20 09:40
Statue or not, comparing Saville to Colston is obvious nonsense.

Saville was knowingly involved in criminal activity and used his charitable work to facilitate and cover up his crimes.

Colston was committing no crimes, at that time, and his charitable work/giving came from a sense of civic pride and responsibility.

To claim that both Seville and Colston did charitable work to hide their activities is rubbish, Colston had nothing to hide, uncomfortable as it today, back then it was considered trade.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 09 Jun 20 09:46
Nazi soldiers were following orders. Where is the difference?
By:
potlis
When: 09 Jun 20 09:53
Point?
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 09 Jun 20 10:01
No point. You would not understand. Just saying is all.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 09 Jun 20 10:02
Khmer Rouge?
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 09 Jun 20 10:02
Clue? It’s not a lipstick!
By:
potlis
When: 09 Jun 20 10:04
Mac Donald’s?
By:
potlis
When: 09 Jun 20 10:09
Ibiza?
By:
aaronh
When: 09 Jun 20 10:30
https://twitter.com/mat8iou/status/1269896135113674753

thread on the Merchant Venturers
By:
aaronh
When: 09 Jun 20 10:31
https://twitter.com/KateWilliamsme/status/1269713381973516290
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 09 Jun 20 10:49
British courts ruled against slavery many times
before the abolition of slavery, helping bring about
It's demise.

How anybody can ever argue slavery was not a crime is simply staggering.
By:
elisjohn
When: 09 Jun 20 11:00
of course slavery is a crime , noone is denying that, but should we dethrone the queen now as her ancesters of years gone by  did terrible deeds
By:
aaronh
When: 09 Jun 20 11:01
actually, we should
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 09 Jun 20 11:01
send them back, send them back!

To Germany that is!
By:
aaronh
When: 09 Jun 20 11:02

Jun 9, 2020 -- 10:49AM, ----you-have-to-laugh--- wrote:


British courts ruled against slavery many timesbefore the abolition of slavery, helping bring aboutIt's demise.How anybody can ever argue slavery was not a crime is simply staggering.


"times were different" works back then if the average person had different views on social stances for example

not if you thought owning people was ok

By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 09 Jun 20 11:15
I mentioned James 2 and William 3 yesterday

2 men that still divide uk,

There are many that argue Royal family has had its day and many
who think they are for the good of this country.

Many of us are related to em too... Even Danny dyer..
By:
potlis
When: 09 Jun 20 11:47
No doubt, in a few Hundred years, those who follow us will consider some of what we allow today to be criminal/staggering, it wasn’t long ago we were jailing homosexuals, today such a proposal would be met with outrage in the UK.

Those pretending that some aren’t sickened by the history of slavery do so for their own ends, the reality remains, for much of its history slavery was not deemed criminal.
By:
macarony
When: 09 Jun 20 11:50
People will look back at our time and say this was the time that free speech and democracy died
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 09 Jun 20 12:07
macarony

You are the Charles Barkley of the Forum, God bless you.
By:
macarony
When: 09 Jun 20 12:13
Thank you my love
By:
macarony
When: 09 Jun 20 12:13
Thank you my love
By:
potlis
When: 09 Jun 20 12:15
Today Millions suffer starvation whilst the World has a surplus of food, what will they make of that, looking back, in a few Hundred years, Criminal? staggering?
By:
macarony
When: 09 Jun 20 12:20
Why is it the case that we still have a third world?
Most if not all the world's problems are caused by this imbalance, sort this problem out and we pretty much cracked it.
But I can't work out why in the last century of technical change this is still the case
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 09 Jun 20 12:53
There are loads of things that need to be addressed.

Looking back at history and learning from mistakes is a good start.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 09 Jun 20 14:27

Jun 9, 2020 -- 12:53PM, ----you-have-to-laugh--- wrote:


There are loads of things that need to be addressed.Looking back at history and learning from mistakes is a good start.


Excellent point.

There are more slaves in the world today than ever in history.

They used a slavers statue as a place to highlight this...

'An unofficial guerilla art exhibit has appeared today in front of a city centre statue to link Bristol’s slave-trading history with modern-day slavery.

The work appeared this morning, depicting around 100 human figures lying in front of the statue of slave-trader merchant Edward Colston.

They were placed in a similar formation to the way millions of people from West Africa were forced to lie on board slave ships sent from Bristol and other English ports to be transported to Bristol business-owned slave plantations in the Caribbean and North America.

But the outline of the ship was made up of blocks with the kind of professions and jobs now done by modern-day slaves, living and forced to work in Bristol and Britain in 2018.

The blocks contained jobs like ‘nail bar workers’, ‘sex worker’, ‘car wash attendant’, ‘domestic servant’, ‘fruit picker’, ‘kitchen worker’ and ‘farm worker’.


https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/100-human-figures-placed-front-2122990

By:
macarony
When: 09 Jun 20 14:36
Before the millennium you never heard of modern slavery an unwitting consequence of open boarders and cheap travel
Page 6 of 7  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com