Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
differentdrum
28 May 20 19:00
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Oct 11
| Topic/replies: 21,043 | Blogger: differentdrum's blog
If you are going to appear and then refuse to answer legitimate questions.

The obvious inference being that by saying nothing they didn't support the Prime Minister. What sane person could?
Pause Switch to Standard View Vallance/Whitty - What's The Point?
Show More
Loading...
Report 1st time poster May 28, 2020 7:40 PM BST
as usual downing st catching up after a doris blooper,says the scientists could have spoken, Laugh
Report 1st time poster May 28, 2020 7:43 PM BST
its hard to keep up but lets have a go on wedensday

doris wasn't allowed to make a decision ,then on thurs the man who on wedensday couldn't make a decision,decided  to stop 2 scientist making a decision LaughLaugh,
so who decided all that LaughLaugh
Report flushgordon1 May 28, 2020 7:47 PM BST
The police have said there is no case to answer , they are not lawyers,the questions were fishing :
Report flushgordon1 May 28, 2020 7:47 PM BST
The police have said there is no case to answer , they are not lawyers,the questions were fishing :
Report Ramruma May 28, 2020 9:09 PM BST
The police did NOT say there was no case to answer. They said Dom going north broke the regulations but not the law, and that the Barnard Castle eye test was proper naughty but it was too late to do anything about it.
Report InsiderTrader May 28, 2020 9:15 PM BST

May 28, 2020 -- 9:09PM, Ramruma wrote:


The police did NOT say there was no case to answer. They said Dom going north broke the regulations but not the law, and that the Barnard Castle eye test was proper naughty but it was too late to do anything about it.


Nonsense.

Going to Durham to isolate was no problem at all.

He MIGHT have been spoken to by an officer if he had been stopped driving to the Castle.

That is it.

No problem whatsoever.

Report Ramruma May 28, 2020 9:41 PM BST
1. I'm right.
2. All of this misses the point. The issue is not whether Dom broke the law but the gross hypocrisy in the man who drew up the rules went and drove a coach and horses through them. That's why people are upset. One rule for them, another for us.
Report Fire-and-Ice May 29, 2020 11:37 AM BST
Done to death ^^
Take this sh1t to the politics forum now that the pandemic is old news.
Report 1st time poster May 29, 2020 11:40 AM BST
use your instinct ,common sense and don't not just look at thread but don't post on it,makes you look a prat
Report salmon spray May 29, 2020 11:42 AM BST
Then chit-chat can go back to normal and have huge threads about Muslim grooming gangs and immigrants living off benefits which is all SO new.
Report 1st time poster May 29, 2020 11:43 AM BST
Laugh
Report 1st time poster May 29, 2020 11:49 AM BST
rather ironic that in early days some people thought it was a bif ff ,descrbing doris,witty,vallance,as doris and his 2 stooges,nice to see them live on tv prove us correct,
2 leading dr,s/scientist,s running a pandemic in uk,didnt want to offer an opinion on Whether testing your eyes by driving a car for 60 miles,with a 4 yr old in the back of a car was a good idea,
welcome to uk 2020,
think they should really stand down .bigger laughing stock than doris and co
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com