Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
differentdrum
28 May 20 19:00
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Oct 11
| Topic/replies: 21,063 | Blogger: differentdrum's blog
If you are going to appear and then refuse to answer legitimate questions.

The obvious inference being that by saying nothing they didn't support the Prime Minister. What sane person could?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 12
By:
1st time poster
When: 28 May 20 19:40
as usual downing st catching up after a doris blooper,says the scientists could have spoken, Laugh
By:
1st time poster
When: 28 May 20 19:43
its hard to keep up but lets have a go on wedensday

doris wasn't allowed to make a decision ,then on thurs the man who on wedensday couldn't make a decision,decided  to stop 2 scientist making a decision LaughLaugh,
so who decided all that LaughLaugh
By:
flushgordon1
When: 28 May 20 19:47
The police have said there is no case to answer , they are not lawyers,the questions were fishing :
By:
flushgordon1
When: 28 May 20 19:47
The police have said there is no case to answer , they are not lawyers,the questions were fishing :
By:
Ramruma
When: 28 May 20 21:09
The police did NOT say there was no case to answer. They said Dom going north broke the regulations but not the law, and that the Barnard Castle eye test was proper naughty but it was too late to do anything about it.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 28 May 20 21:15

May 28, 2020 -- 9:09PM, Ramruma wrote:


The police did NOT say there was no case to answer. They said Dom going north broke the regulations but not the law, and that the Barnard Castle eye test was proper naughty but it was too late to do anything about it.


Nonsense.

Going to Durham to isolate was no problem at all.

He MIGHT have been spoken to by an officer if he had been stopped driving to the Castle.

That is it.

No problem whatsoever.

By:
Ramruma
When: 28 May 20 21:41
1. I'm right.
2. All of this misses the point. The issue is not whether Dom broke the law but the gross hypocrisy in the man who drew up the rules went and drove a coach and horses through them. That's why people are upset. One rule for them, another for us.
By:
Fire-and-Ice
When: 29 May 20 11:37
Done to death ^^
Take this sh1t to the politics forum now that the pandemic is old news.
By:
1st time poster
When: 29 May 20 11:40
use your instinct ,common sense and don't not just look at thread but don't post on it,makes you look a prat
By:
salmon spray
When: 29 May 20 11:42
Then chit-chat can go back to normal and have huge threads about Muslim grooming gangs and immigrants living off benefits which is all SO new.
By:
1st time poster
When: 29 May 20 11:43
Laugh
By:
1st time poster
When: 29 May 20 11:49
rather ironic that in early days some people thought it was a bif ff ,descrbing doris,witty,vallance,as doris and his 2 stooges,nice to see them live on tv prove us correct,
2 leading dr,s/scientist,s running a pandemic in uk,didnt want to offer an opinion on Whether testing your eyes by driving a car for 60 miles,with a 4 yr old in the back of a car was a good idea,
welcome to uk 2020,
think they should really stand down .bigger laughing stock than doris and co
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com