Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
InsiderTrader
15 May 20 08:51
Joined:
Date Joined: 25 Aug 05
| Topic/replies: 14,569 | Blogger: InsiderTrader's blog
The R value in London is down to 0.4.

Only a handful of new cases a day.

Does this mean that the Liverpool School of Tropic Medicine is correct on herd immunity requirement being 10-20%?

Certainly would explain why the  exponential growth of cases goes to flat rate everywhere after 4-6 weeks.

https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/tackling-covid-19/nowcasting-and-forecasting-of-covid-19/


https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-virus-could-be-wiped-out-in-london-in-weeks-as-rate-of-infection-is-slowing-say-researchers-11988579

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.27.20081893v2.full.pdf

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 92
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 15 May 20 09:04
'Regression analysis across UTLAs found that the only factor relating to reduction in ADIR
was the historic number of confirmed number infection/000 population, There is however
wide variation between Upper Tier Local Authorities (UTLA) areas. Extrapolation of these
results  showed  that  unreported  community  infection  may  be  >200  times  higher  than
reported cases, providing evidence that by the end of the second week in April, 29% of
the population may already have had the disease and so have increased immunity.
'

Hope in that...

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijcp.13528

paper published out of the University of Manchester and has been peer reviewed.
By:
lapsy pa
When: 15 May 20 09:16
Great that London new cases are way down.

Maybe the Lockdown is working and the virus has no where to go? Nothing to do with "herd immunity"?
By:
lurka
When: 15 May 20 09:39
Are you going to give the lockdown some credit for something if this is true?

24 new cases in London seems ridiculously low but hopefully it's true.
By:
sofiakenny
When: 15 May 20 09:54
How come we haven't heard about this incredible 24 new cases a day before now?..what was the previous rate a week ago?
Like everyone I hope this is true..it just seems unrealistic in a population as large as London.
By:
Latalomne
When: 15 May 20 10:19
The numbers I have been finding most interesting in recent weeks are all of this are the confirmed cases v deaths in Russia.  Granted they still have a lot of active cases, which still could go either way, but they're currently running at sub 1% on deaths per confirmed cases.  And if you read around, it's not like they have an all-singing, all-dancing, mega healthcare system.  Just 2% of Russians claim to be proud of it! 

Does make you wonder just how many unconfirmed cases there have been in the UK.  Hopefully the antibody test will at least be able to give some kind of clarity on that, even if it doesn't guarantee immunity or for how long.
By:
stridingedge
When: 15 May 20 10:22
It either suggests their deaths are tosh or the number of infections in Europe has been greatly underestimated.
By:
stridingedge
When: 15 May 20 10:23
The figures at face value don't look right at all in Russia.
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 15 May 20 10:29
Good. Got to stick to the lockdown and get it right down; not open up and invite Glaswegians to get the train down and re-seed it. Couple of more weeks folks. We can do this.



The 24 cases seems odd though when we're also hearing about there apparently being so many people who have no or very mild symptoms. How high could that 24 people be if we were testing much wider?
By:
Latalomne
When: 15 May 20 10:30

May 15, 2020 -- 10:23AM, stridingedge wrote:


The figures at face value don't look right at all in Russia.


Correct, but it took a long time for most nations to begin testing on the scale that would have been desirable.  We went ages where only those requiring hospitalisation were being tested.

By:
1st time poster
When: 15 May 20 10:34
the 24 number is actually 10 today on their modelling, depends if you believe there,s been 19 million cases in uk,where in countries using anti body tests spain,france etc,etc thinks its only 4% of population
By:
sofiakenny
When: 15 May 20 10:35
PP..Heathrow still has many flights arriving from Saudi USA and Italy every day...don't worry about the Weegies!
By:
woundedknee
When: 15 May 20 10:36
Fortune Favours the Brave Cool   

London calling to the underworld
come out of the cupboard
you boys and girls WinkCool
By:
sofiakenny
When: 15 May 20 10:39
itp..so 4 tomorrow and 1.6 the next day and so on?
By:
stridingedge
When: 15 May 20 10:39
We Need this community antibody testing Lat and the jigsaw will be far more complete. Wink
By:
sofiakenny
When: 15 May 20 10:42
itp r/e antibody tests used abroad...thought they just found one that actually works announced yesterday?
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 15 May 20 10:45
It could be that countries like Germany and Austria who are being congratulated now, have got it wrong, because not enough people have been infected to come out of lockdown effetively.
By:
stridingedge
When: 15 May 20 10:48
Govt currently negotiating Sofia.
By:
1st time poster
When: 15 May 20 10:50
sofiakenny
yes halves every 3.5 days,

every series of tests proves the 19/20 million figure to have had it ridiculous

over the last 10 days or so a million essential workers,with symptons tested only 3% positive
the manchester uni test continually testing over 5,000 people only had 33 positives from 30 households ,not even passing it on in the household unless most lived alone,

if the 20 million figure were to be believed eventually you,ll get to the point where you test a large group of people who,ve been locked away from virus and 60,70,80 % of them are going to have to test positive,highly unlikely when those working amongst the virus ,showing symptons are only showing 3/4% positive
By:
jollyswagman
When: 15 May 20 10:53
so we get herd immunity at 10-20% but 29% of the population may already have had the disease, how does that work please?

https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1261058066495074304

https://twitter.com/bioinformagic/status/1261199457858789377

the manchester paper has been widely rubbished, the author has taken to blocking his critics.


on the other hand does the evidence that the actual numbers infected are quite low (from spain and france) support the liverpool study? i havent a clue, i am no scientist but it would provide light at the end of a very dark tunnel.
By:
1st time poster
When: 15 May 20 10:54
media on Monday saying virus he forever learn to live with it ,2 weeks time its eradicated in one of the worlds biggest cities,rejoice
By:
jollyswagman
When: 15 May 20 10:56
leaving me confused.com Cry
By:
sofiakenny
When: 15 May 20 11:11
swagman you ain't alone!
By:
1st time poster
When: 15 May 20 11:17
I hope no ones wasting billions on a vaccine, CryCryCry,

house prices in London falling 16% on tues,gone up 35% in last 12 hours, right wing media reporting on the shrewdies selling up before prices drop,they,ll all be panicing now londons immune from virus LaughLaughLaugh,

keep updated for next bulletin
By:
sofiakenny
When: 15 May 20 11:30
juce how come Thailand getting away with this virus..one of the first countries to get a case.
By:
lux
When: 15 May 20 11:35
Full lockdown policies in Western Europe countries have no evident impacts on the COVID-19 epidemic.

"…full lockdown policies of France, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom haven’t had the expected effects in the evolution of the COVID-19 epidemic. Our results show a general decay trend in the growth rates and reproduction numbers two to three weeks before the full lockdown policies would be expected to have visible effects.

Estimates of daily and total deaths numbers using pre-lockdown trends suggest that no lives were saved by this strategy, in comparison with pre-lockdown, less restrictive, social distancing policies.

Comparison of the epidemic’s evolution between the fully locked down countries and neighboring countries applying social distancing measures only, confirms the absence of any effects of home containment.

As a concluding remark, it should be pointed out that, since the full lockdown strategies are shown to have no impact on the epidemic’s slowdown, one should consider their potentially high inherent death toll as a net loss of human lives."

www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.24.20078717v1.full.pdf

Expanded commentary, well worth a look

www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyoaun4c-9E
By:
stridingedge
When: 15 May 20 11:39
Getting harder and harder to argue against tbh.
By:
sofiakenny
When: 15 May 20 11:42
lux..in laymans terms does this mean that staying in is pointless but distancing is an effective game plan..Sweden deaths way way higher than their neighbours(so far)
By:
stridingedge
When: 15 May 20 11:47
Care Homes been their downfall.
By:
sofiakenny
When: 15 May 20 11:50
No country has a good record r/e care home deaths..I believe they provided 80% of Canada's fatalities.
By:
lurka
When: 15 May 20 11:56
From the study lux quoted:- 'On the other hand, results for Sweden suggest that taking  no  action  at  all  may  yield  a  more  variable decay of the epidemic....

Evolution of the epidemic in Sweden  however  indicates  that,  in  the  absence  of any social distancing measures, the epidemic’s decay may  be  subject  to  larger  fluctuations.'

What is he on about? Sweden has taken no social distancing measures and no measures at all? That's absolute bollócks.
By:
1st time poster
When: 15 May 20 12:03
a big stretch but if you believe everything we,re told, sweeden and uk had the same advice ,same thinking etc etc,
only difference sweeden backed their health service to cope with the outbreak,where as the uk didn't/couldn't,sweeden have used social distancing,shielding etc from the start
By:
lurka
When: 15 May 20 12:05
He explains the difference between Sweden and countries that have locked down by claiming that Sweden did nothing and just let it run rife.
I suppose he has to come up with some reason other than locking down to explain it in order to justify his findings but that is complete horseshít.

Sweden has/had more effective social distancing than any other country in the world from day 1 (apart from other Scandinavian countries perhaps). Most people are already isolated from others and work from home some of the time. The government told them to distance more and work from home more before they had a big outbreak, but their numbers are far higher than similar neighbouring countries that locked down. That is because they didn't lock down and their neighbours did.
By:
stridingedge
When: 15 May 20 12:08
TBF Lurka I don't think IT has ever claimed Sweden has done nothing?
By:
lurka
When: 15 May 20 12:08
I'm not talking about IT. I'm quoting from the study lux linked and I've used actual quotes from it.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 15 May 20 12:09
London virus free madame tussards open

Wemberlee here we come.....
By:
stridingedge
When: 15 May 20 12:10
Apologies Lurka
By:
lurka
When: 15 May 20 12:10
no worries mate
By:
sofiakenny
When: 15 May 20 12:12
I guess the Telegraph wants to water down the stay home message as much as it can...poor Boris can only mix message so much.
By:
1st time poster
When: 15 May 20 12:13
same London figures show 18% of 5 to 14 yr olds have had virus ,which would blow school opening out of the water, the forum sage inside trader was assuring us school kids didn't get the virus 2 days ago
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com