So about this 1 in 400 having the "virus"

This is a BBC news story as well

233k confirmed cases, so more people have it then?

But only 1 in 400 have it ?

34k have died? nah 60k have died from another model?

Who's keeping up?

It's the number have people who currently have the virus not the total number who have been infected.

These numbers are pathetically low

0.27%?

0.1% from the highest model rate is not a pandemic

0.05% from the current official number is not even an epidemic

in other news there were 50,000 deaths above the average in april

Absolute b0llocks

50,000 deaths above the average the funeral homes would see massive amounts of bodies ffs

So that one doesn't even get of the ground

Me thinks you're p**sed Drive for show putt for dough

Where did you find that number ?

60,000 is the current mark they are spouting about Covid 19 and that goes back to March

34,000 the offical number, and all other deaths are down ie cancer/heart disease etc

The cat is out the bag

Some people really do believe owt spouted in the media ffs

In real terms there as been no lock down people still go to the shop the shops ventilation system circulates the air you normally get a nice blast in the face just as you walk through the door. So what was the point of wrecking the economy?

It is estimated that 148,000 people in England currently have the virus.

There have been approximately 233,000 cumulative confirmed cases in the UK.

Estimates of the actual number of total UK infections seem to vary between 1m and 8m.

May 14, 2020 -- 11:13PM, macarony wrote:

In real terms there as been no lock down people still go to the shop the shops ventilation system circulates the air you normally get a nice blast in the face just as you walk through the door. So what was the point of wrecking the economy?

I suspect from reading previous posts by you mac that you already know the reasons for that

Mac

The thing even after they've been doctering the figures is absolutely pathetic, 0.05% currently on official body count and its "slowing"

Going off the un-official death model ie 60,000 its 0.1% and "slowing"

Its not a pandemic, no one knows the true true number because they wont release it but even if its 80,000-100,000 it wouldn't mean jack anyway in my opinion

Short answer is no they never should have shut the country down, and if they had reported those first cases in December they are so quick to tell us about now, we'd have seen no shutdown at all

It's all about control they are telling you when and where you can go out it will be when and what you can eat what time you go to bed

They say it could be between 1 and 8m infections

They wont say its 8m because 34k deaths with 8m+ cases doesn't sound so terrible

8m cases with empty hospitals and people start questioning it

Esp when 1/3rd of those deaths were in care homes

They've totally butchered the death figures lately as well

We don't know the exact number that died in hospitals now because they've been throwing in care home/wider community deaths as well

So if there's been 8 million infections the death rate is currently 0.8% on highest death model

0.4% on official death stat

Yeah... Doesn't look so bad does it with an increasing infection rate and empty hospitals

macarony • May 14, 2020 11:20 PM BST
It's all about control

got it in 1

Yes the "will I be able to go on holiday" question being pushed by the BBC sums it up

They've taken your gladiatorial games, your jobs, your schools, your holidays

There's no freedumb

Taken them with by their own narrative and "numbers" because of what is currently nothing more than a type of flu

Their own numbers tell you that

What's happened to the "testing" narrative

Seems to have gone quiet on that front past few days, BBC never shut up about the testing numbers last week... this week poof!! nothing