Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
14 May 20
22:46
Joined:
Date Joined:
30 Aug 17
That's 0.27% of the population?
Well according to some other data there's been 60,000 deaths caused by this virus which is 0.1% roughly
Ermmmmmmm???????????????????
What!!!???
Well according to some other data there's been 60,000 deaths caused by this virus which is 0.1% roughly
Ermmmmmmm???????????????????
What!!!???
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 19
|
By:
This is a BBC news story as well
233k confirmed cases, so more people have it then? But only 1 in 400 have it ? 34k have died? nah 60k have died from another model? Who's keeping up? |
|
By:
It's the number have people who currently have the virus not the total number who have been infected.
|
|
By:
These numbers are pathetically low
 0.27%? 0.1% from the highest model rate is not a pandemic 0.05% from the current official number is not even an epidemic  |
|
By:
in other news there were 50,000 deaths above the average in april
|
|
By:
Absolute b0llocks
50,000 deaths above the average the funeral homes would see massive amounts of bodies ffs So that one doesn't even get of the ground Me thinks you're p**sed Drive for show putt for dough |
|
By:
Where did you find that number ?
60,000 is the current mark they are spouting about Covid 19 and that goes back to March 34,000 the offical number, and all other deaths are down ie cancer/heart disease etc The cat is out the bag |
|
By:
Some people really do believe owt spouted in the media ffs
|
|
By:
In real terms there as been no lock down people still go to the shop the shops ventilation system circulates the air you normally get a nice blast in the face just as you walk through the door. So what was the point of wrecking the economy?
|
|
By:
It is estimated that 148,000 people in England currently have the virus.
There have been approximately 233,000 cumulative confirmed cases in the UK. Estimates of the actual number of total UK infections seem to vary between 1m and 8m. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Mac
The thing even after they've been doctering the figures is absolutely pathetic, 0.05% currently on official body count and its "slowing" Going off the un-official death model ie 60,000 its 0.1% and "slowing" Its not a pandemic, no one knows the true true number because they wont release it but even if its 80,000-100,000 it wouldn't mean jack anyway in my opinion Short answer is no they never should have shut the country down, and if they had reported those first cases in December they are so quick to tell us about now, we'd have seen no shutdown at all |
|
By:
It's all about control they are telling you when and where you can go out it will be when and what you can eat what time you go to bed
|
|
By:
They say it could be between 1 and 8m infections
They wont say its 8m because 34k deaths with 8m+ cases doesn't sound so terrible 8m cases with empty hospitals and people start questioning it |
|
By:
Esp when 1/3rd of those deaths were in care homes
They've totally butchered the death figures lately as well We don't know the exact number that died in hospitals now because they've been throwing in care home/wider community deaths as well |
|
By:
So if there's been 8 million infections the death rate is currently 0.8% on highest death model
0.4% on official death stat Yeah... Doesn't look so bad does it with an increasing infection rate and empty hospitals |
|
By:
macarony • May 14, 2020 11:20 PM BST
It's all about control got it in 1 |
|
By:
Yes the "will I be able to go on holiday" question being pushed by the BBC sums it up
They've taken your gladiatorial games, your jobs, your schools, your holidays There's no freedumb |
|
By:
Taken them with by their own narrative and "numbers" because of what is currently nothing more than a type of flu
Their own numbers tell you that  |
|
By:
What's happened to the "testing" narrative
Seems to have gone quiet on that front past few days, BBC never shut up about the testing numbers last week... this week poof!! nothing |