Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 48 comments are related to the topic:
Herd Immunity 'could be achieved with 20% infected'
Herd Immunity 'could be achieved with 20% infected'
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 48
|
By:
If I t is an expert in modelling then I can see why we have got it so wrong in the uk
|
|
By:
Is the 175k number about right from your understanding of the paper or can you add anything?
I know you enjoy saying 'no you are wrong.' but do not like saying 'you and wrong and the correct answer in my opinion is..'. But why not try and be a little bit more constructive in your comments. |
|
By:
Simply showing you are wrong suffices
Have you ever got anything right ? The trend of going off at a tangent as you are shown up and then you trying to get people to agree 1 plus 1 is 2 to salvage a modicum of dignity just makes me laff |
|
By:
Wrong about what YHTL?
What do you think about policy if herd immunity can be reached with 10%-20% being infected? Does it seem plausible to you given after 4-6 weeks in every area cases drop off regardless of policy? |
|
By:
You are asking us to speculate about double hypotheticals when you cannot accept simple truths
|
|
By:
What simple truth?
There are no simple truths here. |
|
By:
There you go again
 Another attempted tangent Any simple truth that contradicts your narrow view |
|
By:
What simple truth can I not accept?
|
|
By:
There is no scientific evidence that any immunity from this virus is conferred by infection and recovery. Only speculation that it will be as it happens with similar pathogens. So debating about herd immunity percentages is premature.
|