Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Angoose
02 May 20 07:47
Joined:
Date Joined: 18 Jul 02
| Topic/replies: 24,312 | Blogger: Angoose's blog
New cases reported each day since 20 April are as follows :  2,434  3,253  2,413  2,239  1,645  1,660  612  1,173  2,638  509  758  168

Unable to confirm how many tests have been performed on each day, nor whether they have adopted the Hancock methodology to testing, but on the face of it, the figures represent a remarkable drop off in newly identified cases.

They had recorded a daily average of 6,180 new cases in the first ten days of April, dropping to 1,690 for the last ten days of the month.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 38
By:
lapsy pa
When: 02 May 20 08:04
If i am right the 168 last figure is May 1st which is a holiday in France which might have something to do with it.

Italy,Spain and France numbers seem to be coming down as are a lot of other European countries,good news.
By:
Angoose
When: 02 May 20 08:12
I used to work in Paris and can confirm that the month of May is punctuated with a series of public holidays Grin
By:
Reynard
When: 02 May 20 08:41
Some people believe every figure thrown at them without question . While these people form a majority of the population the powers that be will simply continue to invent statistics for the brainwashed to blindly follow . Thus perpetuating whatever narrative they wish to push .
Crazy
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 02 May 20 08:45
Watch the UK numbers gradually fall off from here on in....until the next outbreak Wink
By:
lapsy pa
When: 02 May 20 08:59
Reynard,you are correct,i am fully aware of "nudge" control.Indeed the majority of the population have been blindly brainwashed to accept the words of of the UK's Tory party as truthful.
By:
Angoose
When: 02 May 20 09:02
Reynard doesn't believe that the virus exists, that's how clever Reynard is. Happy
By:
Reynard
When: 02 May 20 09:12

May 2, 2020 -- 9:02AM, Angoose wrote:


Reynard doesn't believe that the virus exists, that's how clever Reynard is.


I've seen no evidence that it does Plain

By:
lapsy pa
When: 02 May 20 09:20
You won't either,maybe you might see someone going into an ambulance as physical proof,that could be anything though.
Enough pictures on the telly showing people having it,that's not acting.
By:
nineteen points
When: 02 May 20 09:21
got to admit i am 90% in reynards camp.i think there is something different out there but not sure whats happening to be truthful.what i am sure of is we are being manipulated for some reason.
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 02 May 20 09:23
Sooooooo...all the governments, health services, international organisations etc have clubbed together to conspire to manipulate the entirety of mankind?
By:
Angoose
When: 02 May 20 09:25
You got it Grin
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 May 20 09:31
I'm 87.434% sure it's a giant space octopus behind it all. I think it has flatulence and this is seeding the atmosphere with toxins that make their way to earth from precipitation.
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 02 May 20 09:36
Sorry, but I think I need to draw your attention to the real conspiracy.

This alleged "virus" broke at the start of this year. At the same time, one of the few people truly able to connect with different realms - Derek Acorah - supposedly "died". Now, has anyone actually seen his corpse? Of course you haven't, and you don't need me to tell you why.


Join the dots sheeple.
By:
Reynard
When: 02 May 20 09:37
How big is 'giant' as in giant octopus ?
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 May 20 09:40
It's all very hush hush at this stage.THEY don't want you to know it exists. But for me it is the most feasible cause of all these worldwide deaths.

I wouldn't believe the size anyhow, as any numbers or dimensions given out on any matter by govts/media are just brainwashing the population.
By:
Angoose
When: 02 May 20 09:42
I challenged the reported death of Derek Acorah and they took me to a morgue to view the corpse.

Now, to be fair, the body I witnessed looked a lot like Derek, but it wasn't the Derek I knew.
They've got the real Derek cooped up in a secret laboratory somewhere, he could even be holed up in Whitehall.
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 May 20 09:42
Once the giant space keep net is built it will be captured and taken further out into deep space before they decide on the next step.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 02 May 20 09:45
Problem is until a vaccine no country can 'crack it' without trashing their economy unless every country 'cracks it'.

If France ends lockdown and reopens borders then the virus will come straight back in from other countries.

Only way to do it is to restrict travel and impose 14 day quarantines on all in coming people which is in practical and/or very costly.

We now know the best solution is to build up immunity in the population to stop a second peak and all that jazz.

Try to protect carehomes and vulnerable as best you can. The experience in Europe shows lockdown makes zero difference in terms of protecting carehomes.
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 02 May 20 09:50
...And back to boring reality...



Don't need a vaccine imo; just need a treatment that changes it from lethal to far less deadly. In the last couple of weeks the yanks have come up with something and now we're planning a plasma trial.


That's the big advantage of a lockdown. You buy yourself time for scientists to come up with stuff. The longer you hold off the fewer people will suffer from this disease. Got to be a balance obviously, but the idea of rushing back when the experts seem to be close to getting on top of it is frankly foolish.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 02 May 20 09:59
Cannot rush back now.

We have artificially surprised it.

It will just spike again to a higher level.

Has to be a gradual return for those who are healthy.

Problem is I doubt it is legal to split it by region or age so have to be by activity.

Schools back for younger kids would be a good start.
By:
Angoose
When: 02 May 20 10:01
IT, trying to correlate lockdown with the failure to adequately protect care homes is a nonsense, as well you know.
The sad reality is that the prioritising of hospitals resulted in an under prioritisation of care homes.
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 02 May 20 10:14
Yep. All this talk of protecting the vulnerable is all well and good but talk about the how. Because, all we've seen is total failure. And beyond that, how do you determine who is vulnerable. Males are more susceptible, BAME moreso again. Then you move on to underlying issues such as obesity, high blood pressure etc. How do you determine the cut off of who is vulnerable or not? And if those criteria are accurate how do you operate businesses properly when you've got a good number of staff with underlying conditions who need to be segregated still?


Jesus, if only they'd locked down two weeks earlier instead of focusing on weekends away and Bunging a Bob for a Big Ben Bong.
By:
stridingedge
When: 02 May 20 10:18
The death rates have been around 0.15 in the 40-49 (8.5 mill) and 0.6 in the 50-59 age range (approx 9 mill)

It's still a big shield for a chunk of the population who are not in care homes.

With already approaching 30,000 deaths there's still nothing taking in all the evidence to suggest to me that without this lockdown these numbers wouldn't be far higher and that's even assuming the NHS didn't go under.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 02 May 20 10:57
PorcupineorPineapple
02 May 20 09:14
Joined: 03 Dec 15
| Topic/replies: 9,450 | Blogger: PorcupineorPineapple's blog
Yep. All this talk of protecting the vulnerable is all well and good but talk about the how. Because, all we've seen is total failure. And beyond that, how do you determine who is vulnerable. Males are more susceptible, BAME moreso again.

^

How is a good question.

Neil Ferguson said in reality you could not protect care homes because so many people come and go all the time.

A vulnerable person shielded at home has much more chance as long as they quarantine stuff coming in so the virus does not get you on surfaces.

As for who is vulnerable there is a clear list of people who have been contacted by the NHS - about 1.5m people. Just being a man or being BAME or being over 75 or being obese does not mean you are most vulnerable. There is a second higher risk group which is people who normally get a flu jab. About 14m people.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 02 May 20 11:01
Angoose
02 May 20 09:01
Joined: 18 Jul 02
| Topic/replies: 15,504 | Blogger: Angoose's blog
IT, trying to correlate lockdown with the failure to adequately protect care homes is a nonsense, as well you know.
The sad reality is that the prioritising of hospitals resulted in an under prioritisation of care homes.

^

Agreed. If the goal was to stop hospitals being overwhelmed they should have thought beyond the supply side (clearing beds, making more beds) and thought more about how to reduce the demand. i.e. do more shielding quicker. I said elsewhere wife got NHS letter on April 10th. That is too late. Carehomes had potentially Covid infected people put into them. Carehomes had too many staff coming and going unchecked.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 02 May 20 11:06
In places like Newham people were not given information in their own language.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/01/covid-19-coronavirus-newham-london-uk-worst-affected-area
By:
Injera
When: 02 May 20 12:36
Many have lived in Newhaven for decades. Could have learnt English....

From right move:

House Prices in Upton Park

Properties in Upton Park had an overall average price of £386,336 over the last year.

The majority of sales in Upton Park during the last year were flats, selling for an average price of £370,166. Terraced properties sold for an average of £419,973, with semi-detached properties fetching £450,000.

- the narrative is that east London is ‘deprived’. It’s a very expensive area where people choose to live despite the costs and the population density.
By:
nineteen points
When: 02 May 20 16:22
so what if france open their borders.if ours are closed nobody can come in surely
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 02 May 20 17:30
2nd wave will hit and take us all out...
By:
saddo
When: 02 May 20 17:50
PorcupineorPineapple 02 May 20 09:14


Jesus, if only they'd locked down two weeks earlier instead of focusing on weekends away and Bunging a Bob for a Big Ben Bong.

............................................


Repeat 3 times daily until the symptoms diminish
By:
edy
When: 02 May 20 18:16
Jesus, if only they'd locked down two weeks earlier instead of focusing on weekends away and Bunging a Bob for a Big Ben Bong.
By:
edy
When: 02 May 20 18:16
Jesus, if only they'd locked down two weeks earlier instead of focusing on weekends away and Bunging a Bob for a Big Ben Bong.
By:
edy
When: 02 May 20 18:16
Jesus, if only they'd locked down two weeks earlier instead of focusing on weekends away and Bunging a Bob for a Big Ben Bong.
By:
Baphornet
When: 02 May 20 19:06
don't ye just love it when a clique sticks together
By:
SontaranStratagem
When: 02 May 20 19:09
2nd wave coming soon

Expect fireworks
By:
Reynard
When: 02 May 20 19:18
Didn't the chinese invent firework as well ? Clever bunch aint they Mischief
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 02 May 20 19:50
cheers ed
By:
Des Pond
When: 02 May 20 23:05
Much more encouraging figures from France. Hope they are accurate and representative, and that they continue on the downward trend. If their closure of the football season is anything to go by they appear to be taking a more cautious approach in general than we are.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com