|
By:
TEST TEST TEST
|
|
By:
This is what happens when you are scared to pick up a bar of soap
|
|
By:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2009316
Nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained from 210 of the 211 women (99.5%) who did not have symptoms of Covid-19; of these women, 29 (13.7%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Thus, 29 of the 33 patients who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 at admission (87.9%) had no symptoms of Covid-19 at presentation. |
|
By:
No symptoms means there's nothing wrong with them
We seem to be reinventing what it means to be sick, and if you question this diagnosis you can be tested positive for mental illness as well, and put into a detention camp for "your own safety" Reinventing what it is to be sane, sane is insane, ill is healthy |
|
By:
Therefore we can conclude that whatever it is that they're specifically testing for is present in 96% of us , healthy or otherwise , and has absolutely nothing to do with this so-called COVID-19 .
Maybe we should seriously rethink these death toll statistics and infected statistics of the last few weeks and immediately cease all this Lockdown nonsense . |
|
By:
If there is not massive amounts of hospitalizations and deaths from US prisons (lets hope there are not) questions will have to be asked about the accuracy of these tests and/or the true IFR of this virus.
|
|
By:
Or perhspa develop a better test that doesn't show as many false positives as the current one does?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Good question , edy (you do ask some good questions , I like that).
Maybe the US are using a different test or maybe the UK test results are agenda driven . After all "there are two different types of test" according to the doctor currently treating my father . Maybe he had the UK test initially when they wanted him to return a positive test and the US test when they were planning to discharge him and a negative test result was required . |
|
By:
Well the 96% was in prisons, which you would naturally assume to have a much higher result.
Also the 5.5 million tests that produced the 20% figure will mostly have been done one time only over a period of 6 weeks or so. If all those 5.5 M were tested again today perhaps it would be 50%+ |
|
By:
96% of those who test positive in prisons had no symptoms of covid19.
That is nothing to do with the percentage of tests in the USA that tested positive. We do not know how many who tested positive in the general population had no symptoms. We also do not know whether people will symptoms were more likely to be tested. It is completely different stats. |
|
By:
So many questions.
What are they testing for? Who are they testing? Young, old, sick, dying, healthy? If you test those with serious health conditions plus some covid symptoms, the positive results will be high. |
|
By:
Actually it was 88% of the inmates that tested positive and only 4% of those had symptoms
|
|
By:
Assuming the tests are valid it would suggest the virus is extremely virulent if 96% of the inmates are positive (admittedly in a closed environment where contagion is far greater) ... doesn't it suggest mass testing in the country is imperative to understand how many might have or have had the virus ... and help to identify how many of the population are asymptomatic ...
|
|
By:
Are you suggesting testing for COVID-19 are made mandatory ?
|
|
By:
*is made*
![]() |
|
By:
Who's testing the tests.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Johnson is a libertarian and doesn't believe in rigid enforcement of regulations .... except when he does ... I merely pose the question ... the politicians should provide the answer
|
|
By:
tobermory
27 Apr 20 18:30 Joined: 01 Mar 08 | Topic/replies: 49,380 | Blogger: tobermory's blog Actually it was 88% of the inmates that tested positive and only 4% of those had symptoms ^ No pal, 88% did not test positive. This is about the number who did test positive that had no symptoms.... As mass coronavirus testing expands in prisons, large numbers of inmates are showing no symptoms. In four state prison systems — Arkansas, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia — 96% of 3,277 inmates who tested positive for the coronavirus were asymptomatic, according to interviews with officials and records reviewed by Reuters. That’s out of 4,693 tests that included results on symptoms. |
|
By:
After testing 2,300 inmates for the coronavirus, they were shocked. Of the 2,028 who tested positive
That's the 88% I was referring to. |
|
By:
I think that was the only prison that gave the specific figures on % testing positive.
|
|
By:
How many of the 96% subsequently displayed symptoms ?
|
|
By:
You'd have to come back and ask in a couple of weeks I guess.
|
|
By:
Oh I see. True. Place is riddled.
|
|
By:
Now confused; believe that three people among family and friends have shook off a hacking cough since Dec..Had it myself for four weeks..
|
|
By:
Makes the idea of going back to contact track and trace impossible I would have thought.
Given the IFR is so much lower than first though and virus has spread so far. |
|
By:
https://www.themarshallproject.org/2020/04/24/tracking-the-spread-of-coronavirus-in-prisons
|
|
By:
200 tests is hardly top science.
if you test folk for mrsa you get quite worrying results too. as most show no symptoms |
|
By:
Seems a strange result when there is a higher population of black inmates and these are the ones we are told most likely to be very ill from it.
|
|
By:
i felt like i had been hit by a truck the last month, completely knackered and poor sleep pattern. Rapid heart rate in middle of night. Today is the first day i have felt good for ages. No cough, no fever. But i certainly had something. Havent been near anyone.
|