No Scientific Evidence for 2m Distancing > Betfair Community

Betfair Community

Home › Chit Chat Forum › No Scientific Evidence for 2m Distancing

Switch to Community Classic App Directory

Chit Chat

‹ back to topics

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

These 87 comments are related to the topic:
No Scientific Evidence for 2m Distancing

Switch to Live View refresh Post Reply

Post your reply

Page 3 of 3 • Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next

sort by:

Show per page

Replies: 87

By:

UBLE/REGY When: 27 Apr 20 00:59

I thought the reason for the 2m distance.....

Is because when people cough there is often a small of spittle in it.....the virus will be in the spittle

so we don't want it reaching anyone else

By:

Whisperingdeath When: 27 Apr 20 07:37

You got to follow the science

By:

politicspunter When: 27 Apr 20 07:50

Apr 26, 2020 -- 10:44PM, screaming from beneaththewaves wrote:

The government's goal was to prevent the healthcare system from being overrun. It hasn't been. Conventional healthcare systems have been used to capacity, and the overflow systems (the Nightingale facilities) haven't been required. Spot-on planning.Locking down earlier would have led to the public simply refusing to comply after a couple of weeks. Why should they? The hospitals would have been virtually empty. The result right now would have been thousands of trolleys queuing up outside the Excel centre, and the Remainers on this thread demanding that Bozo should have listened to the experts, listened to the scientists, who told him not to lock down when he did.

Remainers? You seem obsessed with the EU. It's irrelevant right now.

By:

darren_discombobulates_sports When: 27 Apr 20 10:37

Lurka does post 'FFS' quite a lot

By:

CLYDEBANK29 When: 27 Apr 20 11:28

"The government's goal was to prevent the healthcare system from being overrun."

Sir Patrick Valance has continually said his goal is to save lives.

By:

CLYDEBANK29 When: 27 Apr 20 11:34

You can't seriously think our government and advisers have done a good job. There are plenty of mitigating factors why they haven't, and they have done their best in good faith, but they haven't done a good job. I don't even think it's debatable.

By:

CLYDEBANK29 When: 27 Apr 20 11:44

They were dealing with floods and getting BREXIT done in the crucial period in February. It's almost impossible imo, when your so mentally focused on one thing, to focus in a strong way on anything else.

By:

CLYDEBANK29 When: 27 Apr 20 11:49

We'd just had an election and the pressing thought was fulfilling election pledges. The timing was awful.