Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 48
By:
blank
When: 24 Apr 20 18:30
About 30% of the population are still out and about or live with someone that is, 10.7 million key workers plus their households. Lockdown is never getting rid of it, you would need this group to develop herd immunity. Even then the other 70% can catch it in the supermarket or a shared door handle to a block of flats.
By:
Baphornet
When: 24 Apr 20 18:40
so remember, no snogging  pûssies
By:
elisjohn
When: 24 Apr 20 18:48
yes and only go for testing if you have symptoms,re the 5.00 briefing  and yet as op says most people have the virus without knowing,n this has been shambolic by the gov and top scientist etc in the country , pathetic, and the journalist pathetic, sophie ridge asking today about planes coming  in etc, this ? should be asked 3 weeks or more ago
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 24 Apr 20 18:49
blank
24 Apr 20 17:30
Joined: 30 Sep 10
| Topic/replies: 264 | Blogger: blank's blog
About 30% of the population are still out and about or live with someone that is, 10.7 million key workers plus their households. Lockdown is never getting rid of it, you would need this group to develop herd immunity. Even then the other 70% can catch it in the supermarket or a shared door handle to a block of flats.


^

Interesting. I suppose everyone having to go to the few shops that are open in a concentrated manner also increases the spread?
By:
lurka
When: 24 Apr 20 18:52
Lockdown is not about getting rid of it. It is about slowing a spread that has got out of hand. Try again.
By:
stridingedge
When: 24 Apr 20 18:53
A concentrated manner?

Far fewer allowed in at any one time and distancing in queues?

And if everyone is out going where they please you'd have it better?
By:
lurka
When: 24 Apr 20 18:57
100% of the population being 'out and about' and more wouldn't spread it a bit more, no?
By:
blank
When: 24 Apr 20 19:03

Apr 24, 2020 -- 6:49PM, InsiderTrader wrote:


blank24 Apr 20 17:30Joined: 30 Sep 10| Topic/replies: 264 | Blogger: blank's blogAbout 30% of the population are still out and about or live with someone that is, 10.7 million key workers plus their households. Lockdown is never getting rid of it, you would need this group to develop herd immunity. Even then the other 70% can catch it in the supermarket or a shared door handle to a block of flats.^Interesting. I suppose everyone having to go to the few shops that are open in a concentrated manner also increases the spread?


Yes of course. I used to go at 6am after work and the place was empty, now I queue outside because they've restricted opening times. More supermarkets would help and longer opening hours, I don't know why it takes them 12 hours to stack the shelves.

By:
tobermory
When: 24 Apr 20 19:03
Does the lockdown stop the spread ?

It seems a no brainer, but you see areas that locked down on March 23rd with hardly any cases now worse off than places that had serious outbreaks at that time.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com