twizzle22's post has also gone . It read something like "Interesting , I'll have a look later" . Not sure how that contravenes any code of ethics but clearly voicing an 'interest' in a perceived conspiracy theory constitutes a breach of summat
twizzle22's post has also gone .It read something like "Interesting , I'll have a look later" .Not sure how that contravenes any code of ethics but clearly voicing an 'interest' in a perceived conspiracy theory constitutes a breach of summat
It's an insult to people's intelligence taking this stuff down. It should be held up for the nonsense it is. 99.99% of people will ignore it / laugh at it.
None of his programmes are worth listening to, unless you want a good laugh (that Andrew Johnson guy usually adds good comedy value).
It's an insult to people's intelligence taking this stuff down. It should be held up for the nonsense it is. 99.99% of people will ignore it / laugh at it.None of his programmes are worth listening to, unless you want a good laugh (that Andrew Johnso