Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 88 comments are related to the topic:
Lockdown end date 18 MONTHS away says health minister Nadine Dorris

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 88
By:
jollyswagman
When: 16 Apr 20 22:49
never more than 18,000 tests a day in south korea with a population of 51 million. 30-40 thousand a day likely to be enough for the uk once lock down brings the numbers infected down. we still have to worry about asymptomatic carriers but testing, isolating and contact tracing is the tried and trusted way to deal with epidemics as south korea, taiwan, singapore and hong kong are showing. even with this approach it isnt easy, singapore has had to introduce a lock down as community transmission has gone up in recent days.
By:
HonkyJoe
When: 16 Apr 20 23:06
No, it's not easy. But it does appear to be the only real way of dealing with it until there's a vaccine.   Many of the asymptomatic carriers do get sorted out, by the way, as if you're working through the contacts of the infected people, and getting all of those contacts to test themselves, you'll discover plenty of the asymptomatic carriers amongst them.

It is a lot of work. But the cost and inconvenience will be relatively minor if it keeps a lid on the numbers.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 16 Apr 20 23:14
i agree , i have been saying it for a while on here  but doing so is often labelled as after timing or just being anti tory by some on here. i think masks help too, if for no other reason than stopping you spreading it to others. the czech republic moved to lock down a lot quicker than us and made wearing masks in public mandatory, their deaths per million is a fraction of ours.

there are lots of public health inspectors and animal safety inspectors who could be used to do contact tracing as well as using technology.
By:
HonkyJoe
When: 16 Apr 20 23:15
Clydebank, I have read the estimates of 70-75% in several places. I'll can try and find my sources tomorrow morning, when I'm taking a break from looking through the form.

Just from a quick Google search, I've found a WHO report from late February that said that 87.9% of 55,924 confirmed cases reported a fever.  (Top of Page 12 at https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf) Haven't had a chance to check exactly what the circumstances of the testing were.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 16 Apr 20 23:17
when i say a lot quicker its actually only around a week or so but even days matter when dealing with this thing.
By:
HonkyJoe
When: 16 Apr 20 23:18
Yeah, I've been reading a bit about masks today, and I think wearing of masks in public should probably be made compulsory for a bit. It seems that even a cotton mask could catch around half of all viral matter. I appreciate there are issues surrounding cleaning etc.  But it seems they could stop quite a few of us from infecting others.
By:
Just Checking
When: 16 Apr 20 23:21
Good post???

Many (it's been quoted at 50%, and if the study in Germany was last week is correct maybe considerably more) don't show symptoms AND of those that do not all show a fever AND apparently you can be spreading it before you even show symptoms AND it's basically now going to be endemic to the world.

Feck knows how much good contact tracing (that many people won't comply with) is going to do once lockdown comes down a bit when it's so widespread and so easy to catch. "Someone on the tube had it" / "You went to a shop where someone was in it that day".

As an expert said the other day it's more likely we're just going to have to deal with waves of this like the Flu. Or Herd immmunity of course.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 16 Apr 20 23:26
i follow a chap on youtube called chris martenson and some people who watch him went so far as to get a machine that measures how much shedding various materials block (i think the measurement is microns) so they could work out what was the best material to use. probably not encouraged by government due to shortages for nhs staff when they should be saying make your own. i guess the advice will change in a couple of weeks.

https://twitter.com/nntaleb/status/1249519187359383557 - this graph shows the trajectory in the czech republic once mask wearing (among other measures) came in.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 16 Apr 20 23:28
just checking contact tracing is used in south korea, taiwan, hong kong and singapore. have they have done better than us?
By:
Just Checking
When: 16 Apr 20 23:32
I keep hearing people say things along the lines of "the masks block 3 microns and the virus is 1 micron so what's the point" but I'd be shocked if the viruses come out as single "particles", they are more likely in considerably bigger moisture molecules, so I'd imagine there's a fair point to them.

Next time I go to the shops I'm going to wear one. Not least so I can make provactive tongue movements at pretty women and they won't know ExcitedWink.

Yours,
Just Gene Simmons
By:
Just Checking
When: 16 Apr 20 23:36
Well we'll see. I'm sure it'll help a bit. But as I say, if it's endemic, it'll just be a slowing factor and surely not a magic bullet.

I'm guessing any sort of phone app won't have such a massive takeup and attempts to make it compulsory will lead to .. difficulties.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 16 Apr 20 23:45
no magic bullets, it seems like we will have to get used to it being around.

even if you only spew out or ingest smaller amounts that is good, i think medics are in such trouble as they get huge doses spat their way.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2020/04/taleb-the-only-man-who-has-a-clue.html

taleb is really interesting and thought provoking, he doesnt like contact tracing once its endemic (not sure we count as that yet) but wants lock downs. he gives it to everyone china, scientists, the who and governments.
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 16 Apr 20 23:46
I wrote this in an e-mail to a friend back in February. Nothing I've seen since has changed my mind (or made me any the wiser):

If forced to make a guess, it would be that most of us will get a few extra colds for the rest of our lives, some of which will be nasty and some not. And that people who are weak or ill for whatever reason will get pneumonia the way they do now, perhaps a bit sooner with this new virus being added to the ones currently floating about. I don't see how there can ever be a vaccine if it's the same type of virus as the one which causes the common cold, for the same reason there's no vaccine against the common cold itself. The virus just changes too quickly for any vaccine to be effective in the timescale it takes to bring one safely to the public.

But if there were ever a subject on which everyone, me included, is speculating from a position of ignorance, it's this one. Trying to draw conclusions from data coming out of any country which calls itself a People's Republic is always pretty much pointless.
By:
Angoose
When: 16 Apr 20 23:48
Why don’t we all start walking around on our hands.
That way, when we cough and sneeze, it will quickly fall to the ground.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 16 Apr 20 23:50
what about the nhs being overwhelmed if nothing was done to stop the spread screaming?
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 17 Apr 20 00:02
Oh, I'm not saying do nothing, jollyswagman. You can argue about the scale and nature of the social distancing required, but some clearly is. I mean, the email in question was part of an exchange in which I was describing how I'd stockpiled 4 months of food, medicine, toiletries and dog food. I didn't want to be mingling in crowded supermarkets for the foreseeable future, so I can hardly expect anybody else to.

My point was that I didn't see any way back to as things were. I still don't. Whatever happens, whether we get back to life with only minor changes or wholesale changes, there will be changes. Everyone will have more nasty bouts of illness than we're used to, and life expectancy will be reduced for those with e.g. high blood pressure, chronic illness or just plain bad luck.
By:
Angoose
When: 17 Apr 20 00:13
Do you think that dog food can protect you from the virus Confused
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 17 Apr 20 00:17
It protects the dog from starvation. As for me, as long as I live as long as her, that's all I ask.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 17 Apr 20 00:18
sfbtw, i thought you may have a solution, i havent read the eye in ages but i am sure you mentioned md with a different take.

the nhs is now mainly treating the virus, it would surely be better to have separate facilities to keep all the corona patients away from people in hospitals. there seems little doubt that many people with other problems are too scared to even attend hospital and lots of patients having their treatments put off cant be good.
By:
Angoose
When: 17 Apr 20 00:23
There was a piece on NewsNight earlier where they displayed a chart showing visits to doctors/hospitals for a range of respiratory and other conditions. Dropped like a stone after the lockdown was put in place.
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 17 Apr 20 00:34
Oh, absolutely, js.

The weekly excess deaths have suddenly exceeded the number of virus deaths by a huge number. As many more people are dying of other, now untreated causes as are dying with this virus.

MD in the Eye was at first rather sanguine about the virus (or fatalistic, if you like), tending to the view I expressed above in that Feb. email. People do die, specially when they're old and in ill health. And he's always been opposed to using intubation and ventilators on chronically ill, old people. From that perspective, this virus is just another of those thing sent to try us, and we'll have to accept it.

In the last issue he changed tack, and it was all Boris Johnson's fault. And Brexit too. Basically the same stuff he's been filling his column with for the last three years.
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 17 Apr 20 00:45
This was what I posted on 19 March, on the thread "Has any helthy UK person 45-55 died yet?":
___________________

M.D. in Private Eye yesterday suggested we might look at overall UK death statistics:

The week ending 10 Jan 2020 was the worst of the year so far, with 14,058 deaths. But it's fallen every week since to 10,816 in the week ended 28 February. Deaths are actually lower this year than the average for each week over the previous five years. I like to think it's the handwashing.

I guess this might be a possible way of approaching this problem of what did someone who died WITH this Chinese virus actually die OF. Look at overall death rates, because ultimately that's what matters.

Incidentally, he does also point out that early figures suggest the handwashing campaign has been a roaring success in delaying the surge of Chinese virus (as well as reducing the incidence of flu, hepatitis A, food poisoning, etc.) thus freeing up hospital space, which is what matters in the end.

Wash your hands.
___________________

Not sure how well that has aged. I do tend to think that not touching your face and washing your hands is more effective than keeping 6 feet away and/or wearing a mask. I do hope Boris takes the helm again soon, because I think he's the one politician who might be temperamentally opposed to compulsory mask-wearing. Or compulsory anything. Everyone I see wearing a mask is constantly touching their face to adjust it, and I'd be bloody furious if forced to wear one.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 17 Apr 20 08:05
I would hope by now we know we will have to bring salt to add to the bar peanuts when the pubs do finally open.

Some people are disgusting pigs. I have heard they teach young children to wash their hands in schools but they must unlearn this from their parents.

If I was on a tube or train and I saw someone sneeze without covering their mouths. I would not longer be polite but disgusted.

Tubes are the aeroplanes and cruise ships of the ground. Even bus drivers are dying. I said this about 5 weeks ago, the last time I travelled on a tube....why aren’t people wearing gloves or masks, why is there no hand sanitizer at stations or on platforms. There was no sanitizer at the entrance to shops and none in the pub I went to. I went to the bog and washed my hands.

I have said we have been let down and I get idiots accusing me of being anti Tory, which, of course I am but my concerns are about Government stupidity and lack of leadership. Leaders from all area’s of the community have been in short supply but those who have lead haves been beacons of hope and inspiration.

I don’t think masks are needed in public but certainly a good idea on transport and even in shops. We are in a whole different ball park about Civil Liberties. Those nutters at Michigan may be crackers but raised an important question.

Incidentally the masks are not much of a help argument doesn’t wash with me. I touch my face all the time and it is hard not to. I find it easier to avoid with latex gloves and a mask on. I am not advocating that  people wear masks at all times but certainly should be encouraged to on public transport.

You do not need to be an expert in medicine or a statto to understand where this virus is currently being spread. My suggestion is Hospitals, Care Homes and public transport oh and planes coming in every day. No proof though!

The lockdown is going to continue because the Government has been shambolic in arranging testing. More people are going to die because of this and more people will loose their jobs, houses and businesses or is that me just being anti Tory because everyone knows it’s Chi- nahhhhhh
By:
jollyswagman
When: 17 Apr 20 09:41
from what i have read hand washing seems very important. i thought i heard someone say we touch our faces on average ten times an hour?? i could well be wrong but it is certainly hard to stop doing something that is a reflex. i wear a mask outdoors but am guilty of moving it around as you say, i hope i am at least touching my face less than i was before.

definitely china's fault wd but not many western governments took it seriously until late in the day. of the asian countries who did a lot better job singapore has now felt it necessary to have a lock down as there has been lots of community transmission, particularly in foreign workers dormitories. it shows what a tough thing to deal with it is.
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 17 Apr 20 10:28
Testing isn't the responsibility of ministers. It's the responsibility of that vast army of bureaucrats in the NHS/PHE who are refusing point-blank to

1) Use the nation's vast private lab resources, because that would be privatizing "our" NHS (i.e. "their" NHS), and
2) It's too much like hard work.

Berkshire-based Apacor could supply millions of coronavirus tests, with 150,000 ready for immediate distribution.

It’s a South Korean test, which is also being used in Germany. But Public Health England literally will not return their calls.

The PHE laboratory at Colindale has still not sent for a sample so it can be verified and says it cannot find time to talk to the company until next week.

Anthony Bell of Apacor: “We have been waiting for Colindale for two weeks and it's frustrating because this supplier isn’t some small unknown company.”

Meanwhile, Genetics firm Igenomix have offered a diagnostic lab and highly trained team but have not heard back from the Government.

They have offered to do precisely the same test that PHE is using.

PHE are also failing to provide positive samples from patients to validate tests.

“It was impossible to get hold of anyone at Colindale over Easter. Did they think they could shut for the holidays? Because the virus hasn’t got that memo,” a medic told The Telegraph.

(From the Twitter feed of Matthew Lesh, and reported in the Telegraph, so I suppose it must all be Tory proaganda.)
By:
Angoose
When: 17 Apr 20 10:32
As Health Secretary, Matt Hancock is in charge of all areas of health policy with a particular focus on overall financial control and oversight of all NHS delivery and performance. The Secretary of State will also lead on all aspects of mental health, championing patient safety and driving forward the Prime Minister’s agenda.

The buck stops with Matt Shocked
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 17 Apr 20 10:40
Starts with the 1.3 million employees of the NHS.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 17 Apr 20 11:09

Testing isn't the responsibility of ministers. It's the responsibility of that vast army of bureaucrats in the NHS/PHE who are refusing point-blank to

1) Use the nation's vast private lab resources, because that would be privatizing "our" NHS (i.e. "their" NHS), and
2) It's too much like hard work.


Does the Health Minister have the power to do anything about the bureaucrats in the NHS / PHE?

How are they getting away with this incompetence, laziness and neglect?
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 17 Apr 20 11:35
How do they get away with it everywhere in every country? Hundreds of thousands of them, one of him, I suppose.

I was discussing this sort of thing with one of my Ukrainian cousins. Over there they apparently have a saying that every citizen has two 'hetmans' (a traditional rank of military officer).
By:
HonkyJoe
When: 17 Apr 20 12:59
taleb is really interesting and thought provoking, he doesnt like contact tracing once its endemic (not sure we count as that yet)

Taleb is great. On the endemic issue, I think it would be pointless attempting contact tracing while we've got thousands of new cases a day. Theoretically, though, our lockdown should act as a reset button, and at some point the numbers of new cases should fall to the low three-digits. At that point contact tracing ought to be viable assuming we were employing enough people.

It would have to be done systematically, though, and we'd have to make it clear that people were expected to comply. That would be the difficulty in a country like Britain, though as long as we made it clear that this was the solution needed to get the country back to economic and social health, it might be possible to sell.
By:
HonkyJoe
When: 17 Apr 20 13:12
Incidentally, I notice China have reported 351 new cases today. I don't know if those are anything to do with the new death calculation from Wuhan. If they were, I'd actually expect the new cases to be a much larger number than that.

If they're simply new figures, then that's rather worrying, as that's the first significant dose of new cases since the end of February. (It's still not exactly a big number in a country of 1.4B, but it could be a starting point.) They've started opening up the country again over the last two weeks or so, so that's one to watch in coming days..
By:
Angoose
When: 17 Apr 20 13:14
The Chinese figures were discussed on another thread and I suspect that the new cases and additional deaths are both part of a backdated adjustment.
If they didn't add the new cases, the calculated active cases figure would have been negative.
By:
HonkyJoe
When: 17 Apr 20 15:12
Apologies for raising a point already raised. Wrists duly slapped.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 17 Apr 20 15:57
honky joe, with a more decentralised approach maybe they could have said its too ingrained in london to do contact tracing but carry on in areas with not so many cases? it seems harsh to lock down areas that are relatively disease free.

sfbtw, i read elsewhere of phe 'not wanting to let go of their baby' but hancock surely could and should have forced them?  i am not someone who unconditionally supports the nhs, in international comparisons it isnt that bad, imo, but enough other countries do better. because they seem to have done well fighting the virus i had a very brief look at south korea's system and it seems pretty impressive, single payer with individuals taking out a bit of insurance that isnt too expensive. they do very well on outcomes and costs.
By:
wolf3011
When: 17 Apr 20 16:04
If people do regional lockdowns then people will simply move from restricted areas to non restricted areas, wont work
By:
jollyswagman
When: 17 Apr 20 16:14
would likely need way to much policing to be successful so i have to reluctantly agree, i just feel a bit sorry for people in low infection areas who are kept in when they dont have too much risk.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 17 Apr 20 16:15
too much...
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 17 Apr 20 16:20
The NHS is really a muddle-headed consequence of World War Two.

The Conservatives and Liberals also wanted an NHS (in fact, it was a 1944 Conservative white paper which first proposed free, comprehensive health care). The idea was existing voluntary, municipal and university hospitals should compete to fulfil contracts for healthcare drawn up by local authorities (what most civilized countries do to this day).

Labour weren't interested in that at all. Their aim was to nationalize the hospitals in the same way they wanted to nationalize everything else. The question of whether that would jeopardize actual healthcare was neither here nor there.

In the end, every single other nationalization proved to be a disaster - the National Coal Board, British Rail, British Steel, British Leyland - they all went under or had to be broken up in the end. Yet the most vital one of all - British Health - is the one we're still lumbered with.

My favourite summary of the NHS is contained in this report from the Guardian, headlined NHS comes top in healthcare survey. You have to read down to the sixth paragraph before finding:

The only serious black mark against the NHS was its poor record on keeping people alive.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jun/17/nhs-health
By:
jollyswagman
When: 17 Apr 20 16:31
the commonwealth fund, i did see that report and think it somewhat odd to be rated numero uno given we are very near the bottom for the most important measure. i think the 2017 report was pretty similar.
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 17 Apr 20 16:36
As to why this happened, my mother voted for the first time in the 1945 election which returned Attlee's Labour government. She voted Labour for the one and only time in her life, removing Churchill's Conservative-led government from power. As to why she voted that way, she always said simply "everyone still remembered what it was like before the War, and we weren't going back to that."

Then she and the rest of the electorate discovered the consequences. Billions of pounds in Marshall Plan money from the USA was squandered on nationalizing every industry possible. The same money which West Germany used to fund an economic miracle, by rejuvenating Volkswagen and ThyssenKrupp, was spent on buying uneconomic coal mines for the state and retaining non-jobs.

That wasn't all. The money from the USA was soon spent, so rationing, which had disappeared in the rest of Europe, was not only continued but even extended into areas like meat. The idea, with food and fuel being so expensive in those pre-globalized days, was that by not allowing people to buy food or petrol, they would have money left over to save on UK government bonds, and the government could use those borrowings to nationalize more things.

The result of all that was Labour's majority falling from 146 to 5 at the next General Election, and Attlee resigning in 1951. It scarred Labour with the voters and kept them out of power for a generation.

Naturally, most current Labour Party members hold Attlee up as the greatest premier in the party's history. Those who lived through his premiership, not so much.
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com