Apr 10, 2020 -- 1:40PM, SontaranStratagem wrote:
They've been caught red handed over the past few days bumping the figures But they carry on as if they haven't been caught That Tara Jane Langstons footage in intensive care was obviously from months ago for another illness, some say it was a smoking related illness because she mentions smoking (which has been strangely edited out by the MSM), yet here she is being paraded around on Sky News You could catch these cants committing murder right there and they'd carry on cutting up the body when their rights are being read out, no morals or shame whatsoever, its the absolute front of these people that makes it more comical and disgraceful Sky News yesterday admitted for the first time those 24 hour deaths numbers... aren't 24 hour death numbers but deaths from up to 3 weeks ago. Yet the presenter still went on as if they 24 hour death numbers. These people are facking shameless psychos.
Thanks for coming in Sonta but could you please verify?
That Tara Jane Langstons footage in intensive care was obviously from months ago for another illness
I'm not sure statement that is correct.
https://theglobalherald.com/tag/tara-jane-langston/
Cheers

Apr 10, 2020 -- 2:16PM, SontaranStratagem wrote:
She's an attention seeker trilby, go check out her facebook account, proper little minx all pouting and fake Quite hot but that's no substitute for a money grabbing fame hungry cow, she's been loving every second of her 15 minutes of fame on camera, the sort of woman who'd happily sell her kids for a go at the big brother house in my opinion
I'm not sure what to make of it, Sontar but I've not seen any evidence to say she's she's a fraud. Her anti-5G Change.org petition has been removed from her FB, as has a YouTube video pertaining to her being fake news by Laura Van de Vijfeike. I didn't dig any further.
A far as putting on 5lbs between videos is concerned, she appears to have been in hospital for nine days - three of which were in an ICU. I imagine she would have lost lot of weight initially but could she not have regained it in six days?
I'm by no means having a go - simply trying to establish the truth. Without the truth, we are nothing. Always seek the truth!
Apr 10, 2020 -- 3:00PM, trilby22 wrote:
Apr 10, 2020 -- 1:16PM, SontaranStratagem wrote:She's an attention seeker trilby, go check out her facebook account, proper little minx all pouting and fake Quite hot but that's no substitute for a money grabbing fame hungry cow, she's been loving every second of her 15 minutes of fame on camera, the sort of woman who'd happily sell her kids for a go at the big brother house in my opinionI'm not sure what to make of it, Sontar but I've not seen any evidence to say she's she's a fraud. Her anti-5G Change.org petition has been removed from her FB, as has a YouTube video pertaining to her being fake news by Laura Van de Vijfeike. I didn't dig any further.A far as putting on 5lbs between videos is concerned, she appears to have been in hospital for nine days - three of which were in an ICU. I imagine she would have lost lot of weight initially but could she not have regained it in six days?I'm by no means having a go - simply trying to establish the truth. Without the truth, we are nothing. Always seek the truth!
Fair play mate at least you didn't insult and asked genuine questions regarding my opinion
I just see it in her eyes, she's defiantly not being honest, constantly looking away from the camera, she can't give eye contact with the camera at all
And she's being used as a poster girl, she's an attractive 39 year old woman, they love people like that






grown men and women with kids are being told to behave




Apr 11, 2020 -- 5:18PM, dave1357 wrote:
"breaking the law" isn't a legal term so I have no idea what point he is trying to make. AFAIK the only important issue with an offence under legislation passed by parliament is that the police have to tell you what offence you are committing.There are various offences detailed in the Coronavirus Act eg A person commits an offence if the person—(a)fails without reasonable excuse to comply with any direction, reasonable instruction, requirement or restriction given to or imposed on the person under this Part of this Schedule,(b)fails without reasonable excuse to comply with a duty under paragraph 62(1) or (2) (duties of individuals who have responsibility for a child),(c)absconds or attempts to abscond while being removed to or kept at a place under this Part of this Schedule,(d)knowingly provides false or misleading information in response to a requirement to provide information under this Part of this Schedule or otherwise in connection with the exercise of any power under this Part of this Schedule, or(e)obstructs a person who is exercising or attempting to exercise a power conferred by this Part of this Schedule.
all those "offences" (a) to (e) contravene the coronavirus act...ie they are illegal
but none of them are unlawful
as long as you state that you refuse your consent to be bound by statute then you are acting within the law and are therefore offered the full protection of the law
same as with speeding tickets, if you accept a fixed penalty notice then you are deemed to have consented
)