Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
tobermory
25 Mar 20 20:55
Joined:
Date Joined: 01 Mar 08
| Topic/replies: 63,213 | Blogger: tobermory's blog
This is what the Oxford study suggests

from the Spectator:

Britain is now locked down for at least three weeks, but could the government’s original policy of relying on herd immunity have been right all along? That is the inference of a team of epidemiologists from Oxford university, whose modelling produces remarkably different results from that of Professor Neil Ferguson and his team at Imperial College. It was the Imperial College model which, on Monday 16 March which led to the dramatic U-turn, and the government’s adoption of a complete suppression policy for Covid-19.

Like everything being published about coronavirus at the moment, the Oxford study comes with a health warning. It has not yet been peer-reviewed and, like all form of modelling, it relies on the quality of the data and assumptions which are fed into it. But if it is anywhere close to reflecting the truth, it raises questions about a policy of seeking to suppress Covid-19, with all the lockdowns and economic damage which comes with it. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 - the virus which causes Covid-19 - may be already so established in the population that it might be pointless trying to contain it.

The good news, on the other hand, is that if the Oxford model is correct, it suggests the disease is a lot less deadly than has been feared. It would also suggest that the epidemic will be in decline much sooner than most currently believe, because there will soon be few people left for the virus to infect. The Oxford model suggests that the virus might have been in circulation in Britain for four weeks before the first death was recorded and that a large proportion, if not the majority, of the UK population might already be infected.

Running the model with slightly different assumptions produced estimates that by last Thursday, between 36 per cent and 68 per cent of the UK population had already been infected with the virus, with the vast majority of the population showing no symptoms whatsoever.  An Italian study published yesterday – which analysed the results from a village near Venice where all 3,000 residents were tested for the virus – suggested that between 50 per cent and 75 per cent of those infected show no symptoms.

It has to be emphasised that the Oxford study is theoretical, and it shouldn't be taken as a call to end the lockdown restrictions - at least, not yet. What it does show is the wide gap between scientists on the likely path of the epidemic. Above all, it underlines the importance of finding out how widespread the infection is in the UK population.  All policy hinges on this, yet no-one has any idea of how many people have the virus. As a matter of urgency, we need to test a randomised sample of the population to find this out. The Oxford team says it will begin testing a sample of the population for evidence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. It should come as no surprise if, as more evidence comes in and we have a better idea of infection rates, we end up a different policy on Covid-19.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 100
By:
Injera
When: 25 Mar 20 21:02
Well worth crashing the economy then.....


I’m no virologist, but how is that the virus can kill some and display no symptoms in others? That’s quite a contrast in outcomes.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 25 Mar 20 21:05
i heard of this research yesterday, sadly my enthusiasm was dampened as it has received lots of criticism from other academics, dodgy assumptions.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 25 Mar 20 21:07
at a minimum it does show how we need to test more.
By:
saddo
When: 25 Mar 20 21:08
He would have been crucified for not taking actions which ensured crashing the economy injera, every other country has done it so they must be right. The criticism on here is that he should have done it sooner, but there is every chance that he has timed it better than most.
By:
peckerdunne
When: 25 Mar 20 21:10
Should be one heck of an Easter party..
By:
tobermory
When: 25 Mar 20 21:17

Mar 25, 2020 -- 9:05PM, jollyswagman wrote:


i heard of this research yesterday, sadly my enthusiasm was dampened as it has received lots of criticism from other academics, dodgy assumptions.


When reputations are on the line academics will trash each others work. And they are on the line in a big way here. If the economy is reduced to dust because some Imperial College boffins underestimated the numbers already infected, by a factor of 100, then no one will be asking their opinion on this stuff again.

By:
tobermory
When: 25 Mar 20 21:20
There was another model by The Royal Society of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, which estimated 23 million infected in the UK.

Are there other models to look at ? If not, then the official, panic mongering, Imperial College one is looking like an outlier.
By:
Injera
When: 25 Mar 20 21:22
Reminds me a bit of the Foot and Mouth in 2001.

6 million sheep and cattle slaughtered.
By:
jollyswagman
When: 25 Mar 20 21:32
indeed tobermory, some of it has been described as academic posturing.

i am sure they are all trying but many are putting out research which isnt peer reviewed in the rush to get some answers.

i dont understand the imperial people at all, it is a 13 year old model built to examine flu. they ignored covid data available from 24 january up until early march then when they put some of the actual data into the model they were horrified that the government policy of mitigation / herd immunity (which they decided on due to imperials earlier work) would lead to 250,000 deaths a number deemed too high. actual hospital admissions are double what imperial assumed. this model wasnt released until last week so wasnt peer reviewed and some academics have since criticised it.

one chap who spent 30 years in public health has made some comparisons to foot and mouth (where imperial were also involved).


let's hope we are now going in the right direction but some experts say a lock down without mass testing is pointless as many new cases will emerge as soon as we slack off. it really isnt an easy situation. probably 12-18 months for a vaccine, ffs.
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Mar 20 21:40
nobody knows what's going on.
By:
moisok
When: 25 Mar 20 21:45
good point  lfc  - how many did they slaughter but didn't have the disease

farmers stopping min and ag coming on their farms thinking they were bringing it with them etc   espceially when those farms were clean etc

all forgotten now of course  except by some farmers
By:
jollyswagman
When: 25 Mar 20 21:45
i was hoping for something a bit more sagacious when i saw you had posted lfc, i was counting on you to have cured corona before bed time.

you have let me down.... again Sad
By:
Injera
When: 25 Mar 20 21:49
Scientific research and study is a moveable feast. Interpretation of data as we know, depends on the interpreter..

Let’s not forget we were told early on ‘there’s no immunity’ to covid-19. Well there is as many, many people are thankfully recovering or never knew they had it.
By:
peckerdunne
When: 25 Mar 20 21:50
Laugh a smoothie nor a shrewdie
By:
duffy
When: 25 Mar 20 21:54
The 1.5 million who got letters stating the most vulnerable should be tested pronto, if there is a decent sized amount of them that have already had it without being knocked over then how encouraging would that be in relation to the healthy part of the population.
By:
lapsy pa
When: 25 Mar 20 21:55
If half the population is after having it,why are they looking for all the equipment like ventilators and building new hospitals now?
By:
jollyswagman
When: 25 Mar 20 21:56
hang on duffy you need the crisis to last long enough for the football season to be called off, you need to slow down a bit Laugh
By:
saddo
When: 25 Mar 20 21:57
I think it possible I had it in January while in Bracknell, was quite illish for around a month though kept working, popped two ribs coughing. If there is a  test out there I'll buy one out of interest. Those who have had it could get back to work straight after the peak, if it was policeable to do so.
By:
boxingthefox
When: 25 Mar 20 21:58

Mar 25, 2020 -- 9:22PM, Injera wrote:


Reminds me a bit of the Foot and Mouth in 2001.6 million sheep and cattle slaughtered.


Indeed Injera, What is the right reaction, I'm sure I don't have a clue, an impossible call for all governments, easier of course in Autocratic regimes which bear no comparison to our society. I hope our government have got it more right than wrong.

By:
Injera
When: 25 Mar 20 21:59
Let’s hope things don’t get as bad as ‘17-‘18. Between December and March in England and Wales there were 50k EXCESS winter deaths....over and above other deaths....

That’s 420 a day. 145 of those were respiratory deaths... The flu jab failed.



https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/excesswintermortalityinenglandandwales/2017to2018provisionaland2016to2017final
By:
boxingthefox
When: 25 Mar 20 22:00
^^^ to your 8.22 post
By:
boxingthefox
When: 25 Mar 20 22:03
ignore rhat
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Mar 20 22:05
sorry jollyswagman , I can’t say it any simpler than that .

everyone thinks he knows what is going on , I once saw a rat coming out of a restaurant kitchen
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Mar 20 22:13
The scientists seem quite confident in their forecasts of the duration , blinded ?
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Mar 20 22:21
Wouldn’t it be nice if we could all just hibernate for 6 months like hedgehogs
and wake up when it’s all over
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Mar 20 22:30
Let’s face the facts that human beings may be wiped out , leaving only the humble hedgehog

would that be so bad ?
By:
pa lapsy
When: 25 Mar 20 22:31
By:
jollyswagman
When: 25 Mar 20 22:32
Grin

that's more like it lfc
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Mar 20 22:32
Happy very nice pa lapsy
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Mar 20 22:33
an improvement jolly , thanks
By:
Darlo Bantam
When: 25 Mar 20 22:35
i am sure they are all trying but many are putting out research which isnt peer reviewed in the rush to get some answers.

I believe there's been more papers and research done about this coronavirus than anything before. Shows you the clamour to get on top of it but how much is also peer reviewed, etc.
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Mar 20 22:36
A cute animal diversion from the fear
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Mar 20 22:38
All five hedgehogs in my little garden are sleeping soundly
By:
pa lapsy
When: 25 Mar 20 22:41
Good lfc,was worried with my two, getting a bit late tho april isn't unknown,1st time i saw the field mouse and his 3white feet this morning since november,he looked old.

By:
Darlo Bantam
When: 25 Mar 20 22:52

Mar 25, 2020 -- 10:36PM, lfc1971 wrote:


A cute animal diversion from the fear


Don't know if it's just me, but with the extra quiet and serenity the last couple of days, spring seems to have really sprung more than I've noticed before.

By:
tobermory
When: 25 Mar 20 23:28

Mar 25, 2020 -- 9:02PM, Injera wrote:


Well worth crashing the economy then.....I’m no virologist, but how is that the virus can kill some and display no symptoms in others? That’s quite a contrast in outcomes.


There was a study in Wuhan that indicated Blood Type was a big factor as to whether symptoms were mild or severe. Blood Type 'A' was bad news apparently. It's a bit speculative but I do think Africa/South America have very low incidence 'A' and it hasn't really taken off there as expected.

By:
i_agree_with_nick
When: 26 Mar 20 11:31
How does the study reconcile the fact that approximately 97,000 people in the UK have been tested with 9,529 having been confirmed positive?
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 26 Mar 20 12:13
but could the government’s original policy of relying on herd immunity have been right all along?

That will come anyway regardless of whether they're relying on it. 

It's a case of which comes first, a vaccine or herd immunity.
By:
lurka
When: 26 Mar 20 12:35

Mar 26, 2020 -- 12:13PM, Dr Crippen wrote:


but could the government’s original policy of relying on herd immunity have been right all along?That will come anyway regardless of whether they're relying on it.  It's a case of which comes first, a vaccine or herd immunity.


The UK government's original herd immunity policy, by their own admission, would have involved more deaths being suffered in the short-term as a hedge against a second wave coming in winter which would cause a lot more deaths. If they have indeed achieved herd immunity by somewhat of a 'fluke' (ie they never thought it would happen so quickly and if it has done then there will be no second wave), then all of those extra deaths in the short-term would have been unnecessary deaths, so I don't see how anyone could say that their original herd immunity policy would have been right. They came out and said they weren't concerned with sporting events spreading the virus in the early stages, which was unbelievable really. Just as well they deviated from it and went with a policy which sought to reduce the spread as much as possible.

I doubt that anywhere near 50% have been infected and I think the results of that study should not have been made public, as it can only lead to complacency amongst the public and the results of the study could be way off.

How does the study reconcile the fact that approximately 97,000 people in the UK have been tested with 9,529 having been confirmed positive?
Not sure what point you are trying to make here but 90% of people testing negative does not show anything either way. If 50% or more have been infected, most of them wouldn't test positive at this stage, as the virus will have passed and they would have recovered, and if 50% haven't been infected then they won't test positive either. Only antibody testing, which hasn't been rolled out yet, will tell you how many have been infected to date.

Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com