How many NEGATIVE Tests? - In order to give a TOTAL Tests.
BUT - Just WHO are being Tested?
Doctors, nurses and NHS staff screaming out to be Tested - to know if they are safe to work, treat pateients, and even ENTER a hospital ...
BUT - They are NOT being Tested.
Is it only Hospital admissions that are being Tested?
Hard to see that - as it would appear from other countries 'general testing' that around 90% test Negative... so that equates to 500,000 Tests having taken place in the UK.
Surely, there cannot have been 500,000 Hospital admissions? - the NHS would have been unable to cope.
As of 9am on 21 March 2020, 72,818 people have been tested in the UK, of which 67,800 were confirmed negative and 5,018 were confirmed positive.
As of 9am, 233 patients in the UK who tested positive for coronavirus (COVID-19) have died.
As of 9am on 21 March 2020, 72,818 people have been tested in the UK, of which 67,800 were confirmed negative and 5,018 were confirmed positive.As of 9am, 233 patients in the UK who tested positive for coronavirus (COVID-19) have died.
So around 93% of those tested have tested negative, and surely those being tested are those thought most likely to have contracted the virus through contact tracing, presenting with symptoms, being in hospital?
So around 93% of those tested have tested negative, and surely those being tested are those thought most likely to have contracted the virus through contact tracing, presenting with symptoms, being in hospital?
"Hard to see that - as it would appear from other countries 'general testing' that around 90% test Negative... so that equates to 500,000 Tests having taken place in the UK." Is flawed as you are presuming that the decision to test is the same. If we are only testing people who have a significant symptom, and THEY are testing as many people as possible, you'll get wildly different results. Secondly you're out by a factor of 10, 90% negative and 5000 cases would be 50,000.
But to answer your question, it's been answered today (or yesteday) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/20/coronavirus-uk-testing-people-tested/ "More than 50,000 people have now been tested for coronavirus in the UK, and fresh efforts are being made to widen the net." "Public Health England has previously said it has the capacity for 4,000 tests a day, but the health service has struggled to top 2,000 a day on average." "In the UK, just 5% of tests have been positive."
"Hard to see that - as it would appear from other countries 'general testing' that around 90% test Negative... so that equates to 500,000 Tests having taken place in the UK."Is flawed as you are presuming that the decision to test is the same. If we
There hasn't really been much information on the actual testing. Who carries out the tests? Paramedics when they visit?
There is an obvious suspicion that 'celebrities' like Portsmouth footballers somehow jump the queue.
There hasn't really been much information on the actual testing. Who carries out the tests? Paramedics when they visit?There is an obvious suspicion that 'celebrities' like Portsmouth footballers somehow jump the queue.
There is an obvious suspicion that 'celebrities' like Portsmouth footballers somehow jump the queue.
It's common knowledge that you can get a private test done for £375
There is an obvious suspicion that 'celebrities' like Portsmouth footballers somehow jump the queue.It's common knowledge that you can get a private test done for £375
Thanks to those who have posted the figures - But as other posters have added and indicated - it does not present a picture of categories - and, as differentdrum posts ...
'Who carries out the tests'? .... I would add - and where?
Thanks to those who have posted the figures - But as other posters have added and indicated - it does not present a picture of categories - and, as differentdrum posts ... 'Who carries out the tests'? .... I would add - and where?
I've read that while it might not kill you, it might might leave some degree of permanent (or semi) damage to your lungs. Which you'd understand why if you watched the video I posted last night. So I'd see why owners of assets like multi million pound sportsmen might pay particular attention and pay top dollar, it would be pretty reckless of them not to. Wouldn't surprise me if their insurers are also being d1ckish about it!
I've read that while it might not kill you, it might might leave some degree of permanent (or semi) damage to your lungs. Which you'd understand why if you watched the video I posted last night. So I'd see why owners of assets like multi million pou
just checking, it is similar to sars and a long term study of about 70 medical staff infected with sars in hong kong from 2003-2018 found long term lung damage. (i have lost the relevant article).
x rays of the lungs of patients who go home dont look great apparently.
just checking, it is similar to sars and a long term study of about 70 medical staff infected with sars in hong kong from 2003-2018 found long term lung damage. (i have lost the relevant article).x rays of the lungs of patients who go home dont look
Yea it apparently destroys the lining of the lungs which is why when it's gone it lets bacteria etc walk straight in. Obviously having the lining of your lungs desroyed could lead to heavy scarring and so on. Not nice to think about. I don't want my lungs looking like my liver
Yea it apparently destroys the lining of the lungs which is why when it's gone it lets bacteria etc walk straight in. Obviously having the lining of your lungs desroyed could lead to heavy scarring and so on. Not nice to think about. I don't want my
The number of people who have died after testing positive for coronavirus in Scotland has risen to 10 - the country's 416 confirmed positive cases was described as a "significant underestimate"
So we have a 1/40 Ratio , I would say More likely 4000 Cases if not more ,So 1 in 400
We have lunatics shouting about 20 % death rates
The number of people who have died after testing positive for coronavirus in Scotland has risen to 10 - the country's 416 confirmed positive cases was described as a "significant underestimate"So we have a 1/40 Ratio , I would say More likely 4000 Ca
These are the only ones whose identities have been revealed as confirmed cases . None of 'em have died yet although hopefully that will change with regard to the latter
Coachbuster • March 22, 2020 4:48 PM GMTJust WHO are being Tested - in UK?erm, footballers, celebrities .....and politicians These are the only ones whose identities have been revealed as confirmed cases . None of 'em have died yet although hopef
THIS Video - is the BEST by far and away - at explaining EVERYTHING about COVID-19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtN-goy9VOY
Answers the questions posed below - a fair few minuttes into the Video
jollyswagman 22 Mar 20 14:51
just checking, it is similar to sars and a long term study of about 70 medical staff infected with sars in hong kong from 2003-2018 found long term lung damage. (i have lost the relevant article).
x rays of the lungs of patients who go home dont look great apparently.
Just Checking 22 Mar 20 15:27
Yea it apparently destroys the lining of the lungs which is why when it's gone it lets bacteria etc walk straight in. Obviously having the lining of your lungs desroyed could lead to heavy scarring and so on. Not nice to think about.
THIS Video - is the BEST by far and away - at explaining EVERYTHING about COVID-19https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtN-goy9VOYAnswers the questions posed below - a fair few minuttes into the Video jollyswagman 22 Mar 20 14:51 just checking, it is sim