Lisa Nandy Car Crash Interview

There is no such thing as a simple question regarding transsexuals participation in gender denominated sport.

How on earth did Labour politics come to this?

Piers asks the same simple question three/four times but she then goes on about Caster Semenya and then about disabled athletes, didn't seem able to answer the question.

While they continue put a handful of freaks in front of half the population they'll never get in, thank goodness.

Labour can wheel out a small army of scatterbrained women MPs like Lisa Nandy.

And she's one of the best.

That’s it Dr C. She really is one of the better ones. Someone who has spoken of labour needing to return to its roots.

How is it then that Labour has become overtaken by the he/she movement?

I mean she's one of the best of a really poor lot. Labour have pursued a policy of choosing people for what they were born as, in order to tick the right boxes.
The BBC are doing the same with their policy of employing ethnic presenters. Both the Labour party and the BBC are suffering as a result.

Both suffer the infection of guardianitus, and look where they are.

Going back to the sport, can the trannies wear a weight cloth to even things up?

Going back to the sport, can the trannies wear a weight cloth to even things up?

She's shown once again that she's as thick as you like but that's no obstacle to career progression in left wing politics.

She looked like she was about to go into a tantrum in morgans interview then, quite predictably, started the "I can't make a coherent argument on this so I'm just going to accuse you of being a [Insert Whatever Seems Most Appropriate]-phobe/ist" tactic which is now the default option of all lefties and every SJW on the internet when losing an argument. Or the first step in said argument.

Quite pathetic.

Talking of which, I see the "no platformers" of the left are also enraged that, god forbid, Farage was allowed on the BBC again. They seem to want anyone who is right of centre or pro Brexit expunged from their broadcasted safe spaces, so they can watch the likes of Question Time and nod along with a panel full of communists like Ash Sarkar and the usual BBC Grauniad reader audience, no contrary opinion allowed. They've cleansed the universities of free speech, next stop the media. It's becoming that any time someone the snowflakes don't like appears on the BBC they now go into meltdown on Twitter and the press then report on this outrage as if it means something.

I mean WTF planet are we on that there is a freakin self proclaimed and proud COMMUNIST ****wit on the panel of QT (who is always on the BBC anyway), and this gets no comment, but they want people against immigration prevented from speaking?

The same Sarkar who said:

’The white British population (in London) has decreased by 600,000, while the minority population has increased by 1.2 million. So yes lads, we’re winning’. ”

300/20,000

I have just watched the interview - gobsmacked I think is the term.  This might be our prime minister one day

I have just watched the interview - gobsmacked I think is the term.  This might be our prime minister one day

She was so angry with her inept performance that she bordered on tears at times.

Potential maybe but you need experience. Neither main party has more than 5 MPs who deserve to be cabinet ministers and Labour ones are all out of favour. Nobody got a Cabinet post without 10 years in the Commons and at least 5 as a junior minister or shadow in any past administration.

I found it genuinely worrying that she couldn't bring herself to say that wiggy c0ck geezers competing against women is unfair. It absolutely is, to any objective person.

She refused to give her view on the situation where men who identify themselves with women, are allowed to take part in competitions that are staged for proper women.

I don't think she gained many supporters from those who watched that interview.

But that's been Labour's problem since the referendum - they sit on the fence and end up losing support from both sides.

My beloved Labour Party the nightmare continues.

The Prime Minister refuses to confirm how many children he has, if he even agrees to an interview in the first place.

Aye, but he's not pitching to lead a bunch of also rans, thank goodness.

Angoose displays another of Labour's problems, they seem to rate an MP's personal private matters as highly as their policies.

I suppose that's what becomes of having too many women in high places in their party.

The lgbtxyz mob are setting themselves up against women. The Left are destroying themselves over issues like this.

‘ Trans activists have been accused of launching smoke grenades at a Labour Women's Declaration march held in West London Monday evening, in the shadow of Grenfell Tower.
The march was held to raise concerns over the Labour Party's policy on transgender rights and the issue of the perceived intrusion of trans rights into the realm of women's rights.’




https://www.rt.com/uk/482738-trans-activists-smoke-bombs-grenfell/

Good luck finding this story on the BBC.

I mean WTF planet are we on that there is a freakin self proclaimed and proud COMMUNIST ****wit on the panel of QT (who is always on the BBC anyway), and this gets no comment, but they want people against immigration prevented from speaking?

When I was at college there was one lefty-type boy who was fond of wearing a red hoodie with CCCP and the Hammer & Sickle logo on it.  I was amazed that nobody batted an eyelid.

this is how it started in Germany way back - nasty noisy dedicated extremists

Bizarre interview in some respects.

Piers virtue signalling about womens rights and playing the hierarchy of oppression game putting women above trans. Calling for more authoritarian rules to police this outrage.

Nandy refusing to play identity politics. Doesnt think it needs the weight of the state to resolve.

The arrogant Piers Morgan and his planet sized egocannot be taken seriously.
His complete raison d'etre is to create controversy, by aggressively contradictory shouty sound bites, under the false pretex of taking the  moral ' high ground ' .
He has history.

If we extrapolate the far left ideology, there should be no mens' events and womens' events. Just one event for all humans. We are after all born equal, and can be what we claim to be, (regardless of the uncomfortable reality for a vocal, social media brainwashed few).

If a "woman" has a penis then "she" isn't a woman-simples.

According to my workplace, gender isn't binary

If we extrapolate the far left ideology, there should be no mens' events and womens' events. Just one event for all humans cider

There would no women in sport then, men are much better at it.

Not a bad idea, I never watch women's sport. and I believe it is important for men, helps channel their physical aggression

Women don't have much physical aggression...more aggression of the tongue.

Start with sport/games of skill. Snooker, darts, archery, shooting etc. It's sexist to hold darts competitions open only to those who claim to be female.

Morgan does not give two fooks about anybody...Arrogant ****.

Support the wiggy lot over real females at your peril, common sense is beginning a comeback.

uble   you clearly haven't watched women's rugby - the sky commentators are also apologising for all the bad language   - such is the ladies  game  ho ho

all that comes across is that most people from the labour party are completely out of touch with what ordinary people think about anything

they're all about backing minority causes above the vast majority of the population no matter how non sensical that position may be

morgan always GO,S for a ridiculous argument but don't really see the problem iuf a woman finished 2nd to usain bolt as a tranny everyone no,s she,s the best fewmale, its like the London marathon you get a tkk saying you've finished 3455th and have to look online later to see where that is in different catogries female,age etc etc,there,s athletes out there finished 2nd,3rd to doper,s,better equipment,cheating,dodgeyt tactic etc ,etc and people themselves work out who,s the moral winner

but don't really see the problem iuf a woman finished 2nd to usain bolt as a tranny






You might if you'd put in a lifetimes graft for a silver medal.

any worse than finishing 2nd a Russian cheat,lance Armstrong, etc, how do you think people feel now after running behind mo farah, people can work out for themselves who,s the moral winner, that Semenya has more testosterone than lots of men but finish 2nd to her
maybe athletics should use all Semenya,s data as the bottom line for if trannys can compete,get down to her levels and its ok

Sport is about winning, there is no sperate record kept for moral winnners. I honestly can't think why you would try to obfuscate on this.

Ask Lance Armstrong about that.