Lisa Nandy Car Crash Interview

There is no such thing as a simple question regarding transsexuals participation in gender denominated sport.

Piers asks the same simple question three/four times but she then goes on about Caster Semenya and then about disabled athletes, didn't seem able to answer the question.

Labour can wheel out a small army of scatterbrained women MPs like Lisa Nandy.

And she's one of the best.

I mean she's one of the best of a really poor lot. Labour have pursued a policy of choosing people for what they were born as, in order to tick the right boxes.
The BBC are doing the same with their policy of employing ethnic presenters. Both the Labour party and the BBC are suffering as a result.

Going back to the sport, can the trannies wear a weight cloth to even things up?

She's shown once again that she's as thick as you like but that's no obstacle to career progression in left wing politics.

She looked like she was about to go into a tantrum in morgans interview then, quite predictably, started the "I can't make a coherent argument on this so I'm just going to accuse you of being a [Insert Whatever Seems Most Appropriate]-phobe/ist" tactic which is now the default option of all lefties and every SJW on the internet when losing an argument. Or the first step in said argument.

Quite pathetic.

Talking of which, I see the "no platformers" of the left are also enraged that, god forbid, Farage was allowed on the BBC again. They seem to want anyone who is right of centre or pro Brexit expunged from their broadcasted safe spaces, so they can watch the likes of Question Time and nod along with a panel full of communists like Ash Sarkar and the usual BBC Grauniad reader audience, no contrary opinion allowed. They've cleansed the universities of free speech, next stop the media. It's becoming that any time someone the snowflakes don't like appears on the BBC they now go into meltdown on Twitter and the press then report on this outrage as if it means something.

I mean WTF planet are we on that there is a freakin self proclaimed and proud COMMUNIST ****wit on the panel of QT (who is always on the BBC anyway), and this gets no comment, but they want people against immigration prevented from speaking?

300/20,000

I have just watched the interview - gobsmacked I think is the term.  This might be our prime minister one day

Potential maybe but you need experience. Neither main party has more than 5 MPs who deserve to be cabinet ministers and Labour ones are all out of favour. Nobody got a Cabinet post without 10 years in the Commons and at least 5 as a junior minister or shadow in any past administration.

She refused to give her view on the situation where men who identify themselves with women, are allowed to take part in competitions that are staged for proper women.

I don't think she gained many supporters from those who watched that interview.

But that's been Labour's problem since the referendum - they sit on the fence and end up losing support from both sides.

The Prime Minister refuses to confirm how many children he has, if he even agrees to an interview in the first place.

Angoose displays another of Labour's problems, they seem to rate an MP's personal private matters as highly as their policies.

I suppose that's what becomes of having too many women in high places in their party.

I mean WTF planet are we on that there is a freakin self proclaimed and proud COMMUNIST ****wit on the panel of QT (who is always on the BBC anyway), and this gets no comment, but they want people against immigration prevented from speaking?

When I was at college there was one lefty-type boy who was fond of wearing a red hoodie with CCCP and the Hammer & Sickle logo on it.  I was amazed that nobody batted an eyelid.

Bizarre interview in some respects.

Piers virtue signalling about womens rights and playing the hierarchy of oppression game putting women above trans. Calling for more authoritarian rules to police this outrage.

Nandy refusing to play identity politics. Doesnt think it needs the weight of the state to resolve.

If we extrapolate the far left ideology, there should be no mens' events and womens' events. Just one event for all humans. We are after all born equal, and can be what we claim to be, (regardless of the uncomfortable reality for a vocal, social media brainwashed few).

According to my workplace, gender isn't binary

Start with sport/games of skill. Snooker, darts, archery, shooting etc. It's sexist to hold darts competitions open only to those who claim to be female.

Support the wiggy lot over real females at your peril, common sense is beginning a comeback.

all that comes across is that most people from the labour party are completely out of touch with what ordinary people think about anything

they're all about backing minority causes above the vast majority of the population no matter how non sensical that position may be

but don't really see the problem iuf a woman finished 2nd to usain bolt as a tranny






You might if you'd put in a lifetimes graft for a silver medal.