|
By:
god was killed by the big bang
|
|
By:
As dave knows scientists are told to lie and the others remain silent-like over 2,000 EMF scientists begging Governments NOT to roll out 5G-all ignored.
|
|
By:
Do they remain silent or are over 2000 EMF scientists begging?
|
|
By:
A little bird told me there were over 2000 climate scientists begging the elites not to roll out Saint Greta. They too were ignored.
|
|
By:
how they doing with the thick ice they can't get through or the extinct polar bears
|
|
By:
Another day past without the shiny hat crew bothering to explain what scientists got so wrong for 60 years thus making every evidence based scientific theory worthless????
Maybe the "Truth" lies in an hour long you-tube video. Wonder why there is an increase in mumps in tge 18-25 age group. I suspect David Icke has the answer, |
|
By:
Yawn
|
|
By:
Posted before Mex but here we go:
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions |
|
By:
Injera have you actually read the "articles " on that link.
The "new ice age" stories are based on humans burning more & more coal & blocking out sun. They are also articles based on the views of one or two scientists. We didn't continue to expand coal use - in UK coal mining pretty much ended. Btw Injera - don't suppose you know what theses scientists got wrong for 60 years regarding planets? Apparently this story is so important that the flat Earthers believe it proves all science is wrong & only loon-tubers know the "truth " Unfortunately nobody will actually explain what the scientists got wrong with the planet formation theory. What would David Icke do? |
|
By:
|
|
By:
No conspiracies..... Nothing to do with climate change .... Just noticed a report on the news (BBC) that scientists now saying new findings suggest that the planets in our SS were not created the way they thought that they had, for the last 60 odd years.
Too much paranoia on here... |
|
By:
My apologies Mex. I had no idea the UK was the centre of the Universe and it’s coal usage pivotal to global climate!
Those articles are evidence that scientists aren’t to be trusted. |
|
By:
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/mars-formation-collisions-meteorites-earth-space-a9332336.html
We might be wrong about how Mars formed, scientists have said. The Red Planet may have taken much longer to form, and done so in an unexpectedly violent way, according to new research. - ‘new research’. Science is a movable feast. Always has been. These ones have the grace to admit it. |
|
By:
oh boy oh boy
|
|
By:
Injera
I think you will find that UK is not alone in reducing large particles pollution (Coal) Nobody with the ability to think would claim those carefully selected articles (most from the center of the Universe - USA) are evevidence that scientists can8be trusted. Those capable of thought, logic, science would be asking how widespread were these opinions 50 years ago, why were the predictions made / what was the evidence/reasoning behind the story And why did the predictions fail. The uneducated would just believe a 2 hour loon tube video & come to the incorrect conclusion that all scientists are wrong and can't be trusted. Then they will polish their hat before sending Icke money. |