Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 47 comments are related to the topic:
Samira Ahmed
Samira Ahmed
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 47
|
By:
Indeed, she has a more or less captive audience. Anyone could read it-for much less money- and the same number of people would listen.
|
|
By:
Just sack them all please
|
|
By:
Who could argue with that?
|
|
By:
You're a t1t, lfc1971. The ruling assumes that sitting in a chair reading an autocue is the same, irrespective of viewers or popularity or content. Samira Ahmed got the same money as he man she replaced as Newswatch presenter. As nauseating as Jeremy Vine is, he presents Points Of View which is more popular, more rounded and has much wider interest.
As an Asian woman, she has the ability to grow facial hair as well as Jeremy Vine but as facial hair is not part of the job description.....  As with the decision with that menopausal old hag Carrie Gracey, the tribunal compared a similar post on the US to her position in Asia, even though she did a quarter of the work that the North America editor did. |
|
By:
why does viewership matter in a company which brings in no advertising revenue?
|
|
By:
When BBC show the fa cup do all the players have to be paid the same?
|
|
By:
But 6x more than the other? Even a moron cannot come to that conclusion.
|
|
By:
The problem isn't that she was under paid, its that he was vastly over paid.
I still don't understand why viewership plays any major role on their salary. If they were able to show high viewership brought high advertising revenues, then fair enough but the BBC has no advertising. Linekers wage is an absolute disgrace when you see what he does |