Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
i_agree_with_nick
10 Dec 19 18:55
Joined:
Date Joined: 21 May 10
| Topic/replies: 14,074 | Blogger: i_agree_with_nick's blog
So why on earth don't we have the option to vote electronically?  That would surely boost the turnout percentage.

And counting votes by hand?  There's got to be a better, quicker and more accurate way to do this.  I remember doing exams in the 1980s where part of the paper was multiple choice.  You had to place a horizontal line in a box which I think was read by some sort of electronic device.
Pause • Switch to Standard View General Election 2019...
Show More
Loading...
Report i_agree_with_nick • December 10, 2019 7:02 PM GMT
You could test it in a mock election then introduce it on a limited basis in a local or by-election.

The electronic count could be run in parallel with a manual count.

I never hear this being discussed in the media.
Report moisok • December 10, 2019 7:42 PM GMT
wot!!!  with the 12 to a house voting tactic   yeah  right on!!!!
Report Crisp77 • December 10, 2019 7:50 PM GMT
You could have it like x factor where you vote out a candidate every week
Report i_agree_with_nick • December 10, 2019 7:57 PM GMT
They do it in some countries and there are potential issues.  But whether voting is manual or electronic, surely we can automate the counting?
Report Torquemada • December 10, 2019 8:03 PM GMT
Fingerprint or retina scan technology would be good. It might at least hinder Labour’s usual vote r1gging efforts.
Report i_agree_with_nick • December 10, 2019 8:08 PM GMT
One issue that has just occurred to me is that your vote wouldn't be secret.
Report darren_discombobulates_sports • December 10, 2019 8:18 PM GMT
online voting would be very susceptible to hackers and fraudsters looking to manipulate the vote cause general havoc, would be a target every time.

Then there's the millions who abstain are suddenly finding themselves on casting a vote because a household member has encouraged them to sign up so he/she can vote twice/thrice etc for who They want. Many vulnerable people would easily be taken advantage of,

The website could also crash with millions casting a vote near to the deadline which would be pandemonium, you'd have calls to null and void the vote whilst those who unexpectedly won a seat would be arguing opposite, then you'd have to rearrange the whole thing probably manually with a much lower turnout, not to mention costly exercise.
Report i_agree_with_nick • December 10, 2019 8:22 PM GMT
Yes, dds. A few potential teething problems!  But as an ex-boss of mine would say, "give me solutions, not problems!"

Anyway, we can automate the count, can't we?
Report darren_discombobulates_sports • December 10, 2019 8:43 PM GMT
You can't really protect against the things I listed, way too much at stake with no fullproof way of preventing such manipulation, also many people like a trip to the village hall, town hall or wherever, tradition and all thatSilly tv would also not like it, less air time waiting for votes to come in.
Report casemoney • December 10, 2019 10:16 PM GMT
1.48  tory maj Shocked
Report anxious • December 10, 2019 10:19 PM GMT
Laugh
Report anxious • December 10, 2019 10:20 PM GMT
Come on you guys we know we can stop Bullingdon Cool
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com