|
By:
LIB DEMS PROMISE 10,000 MORE REFUGEES EVERY YEAR - WHAT A VOTE WINNER
|
|
By:
The EU thought it was a good idea to let in 1 million unchecked muslims in a few months!
Germany did so unilaterally without even bothering to ask other EU individual countries what they thought of this insane decision. Even though those nations would have to face up to the Freedom of Movement of that million thereafter. What a partnership of member nations eh? |
|
By:
I have to laugh at the usual defenders of the faith on here - they are so predictable. One wonders what will happen to them as the demographic shift lumbers on.
|
|
By:
half a million romanians which we were told would not be coming but they did old barrage was spot on when he warned us
|
|
By:
Was it not the ex Libyan leader (now deceased) who mentioned population growth to achieve an objective.
|
|
By:
The Champagne socialist Lucas frantically digging herself into an ever deeper environmentally unfriendly trench...
https://youtu.be/rDL_uPhzxRE?t=2122 |
|
By:
I still don't get why you guys are willing to give tories a free pass when they've been carrying on doing exactly the same stuff you're accusing labour of.
|
|
By:
Lib Dems promising more teachers for schools etc, no mention of immigration and the million extra every 2 years, 10s of millions over 20 years + only the THICKEST would vote Lib,Lab Greens...just totally ignore the real problem, TOO MANY PEOPLE!
|
|
By:
lux - thanks.
Dale makes the obvious point that mass migration is no friend to the environment. Lucas just can't or won't see the link!! This point doesn't just apply to the Greens but all the parties. |
|
By:
Absolutely Inj, whatever your political persuasion you just cannot in any way shape or form credibly be considered or badge yourself as "Green" if you are advocating freedom of movement. Completely negates and nullifies your entire raison d'être. Abject incoherence.
|
|
By:
So you're voting Tory because their manifesto says they'll "control" immigration this time.
Don't know if you guys would prioritise actually checking a politician's record over promises they might make but you might want to check out their last 3 manifestos and how their record on immigration stood up against what they promised. And then maybe think how much you should trust the latest one. |
|
By:
I'll be holding my nose and voting Spiv because I see them as the least worst option. I'd be amazed if they were able to reduce immigration by any meaningful degree.
Sad to say, but Europe looks irretrievably goosed. |
|
By:
alun2005, you need to sit down and have a wee cup of tea.
|
|
By:
porky is just a long line of apologists
you wander what on earth he would support and what we would end up with |
|
By:
I'm voting Tory because I want Brexit to escape the clutches of The EU - the other Parties do not interest me; "chicken" Corbyn annoys me with his waffling.
I also trust the Tories more on Economy than "chicken" Corbyn and his motley shadow front bench; I dislike Labour's giveaway election pledges more than the Tories too - Labour's resembles fantasy and irrelevance eg broadband - how necessary is it? It's not tv licence or water, electricity or council tax. |
|
By:
I'm voting Tory because I want Brexit to escape the clutches of The EU - the other Parties do not interest me
With the risk of sounding ignorant about British politics again, you're voting for the party that has been milking Brexit for the last 3 years and is out to get your vote precisely because they couldn't achieve what you are voting them for. |
|
By:
Your own chancellor has ruined a whole continent in no time, everything that has happened here in the last 3 years is a result of her error.
|
|
By:
That's condescending coming from you 'detraveller'.
I just want Brexit, but for the MPs playing games ie not fulfilling the wish of the majority of the electorate in the 2016 EU Referendum in the corridors of power Brexit would not be the no 1 thing on the electorate mind in the coming election. And, to blame it solely on the Tories shows a distinct lack of understanding of numbers in The House Of Commons and 2017 Election Results. However, I do hope you understand the majority of MPs (including The Speaker) are 'Remainers' (at least) otherwise there is little point of going any further with this discussion. |
|
By:
The thick brainless coont must read the sun , the mail and the torygraph every day
|
|
By:
Yer Merkel ruined the continent. But how would you react if I told you I'm voting Merkel again? Because when you tell me you're voting Tory, all I see is you voting for the same party that has been in power for 9 years, didn't fulfill the public's Brexit wishes and continues to let anyone come into the country. You see what I mean?
|
|
By:
Yes I accept I don't have a clue about the distribution of reps in the Houses. But it does look strange from the outside. Especially when Corbyn gets so much crap for free money lovers when its the tories letting them all in.
|
|
By:
Every government had erred with illegal immigration - they never had the stomach to deal with it for fear of upsetting their supporters, within and outside the Parties; The UK hand is tied by The EU where immigration is concerned with nationals from there. Also, immigration level will never come down - net migration might (eventually).
|
|
By:
Imp, can you explain this point further please.
|
|
By:
EU does not stop UK from carrying out border checks. It doesn't force you to let in people from South Asia for instance. The Tories continue to let everyone in when EU asked only to let EU folks in. Surely that has nothing to do with the MPs being remainers or leavers or their numbers in the House?
|
|
By:
It also doesn't force the UK to never implement various available measures regarding EU immigration. Something the Tories mysteriously haven't implemented despite various pledges to limit immigration.
...and as the UK got less attractive for EU immigrants after Brexit, non-EU immigration mysteriously picked up despite the pledges. |
|
By:
i.e Tories want a certain level of immigration, they know the UK needs a certain level of immigration...but they've been taking everyone for fools by not being frank to you about it.
|
|
By:
Just because things have been so badly mismanaged in the past doesn’t mean we have to continue on those same disasterous lines
Stopping freedom of movement is an essential and important start |
|
By:
There is not a single country in the modern world that needs immigration
|
|
By:
Maybe so, but the Tories have promised to cut immigration for the last three elections and actually did the opposite.
They've been in full control of non-EU immigration in all that time and have overseen it rise every year. They've had rules available to manage EU immigration and kick out anyone who wasn't contributing and have simply chosen to not apply them. And since EU nationals have been leaving they've been running employment schemes for further Eastern European countries and elsewhere to add numbers from further afield. Just don't be surprised if - once again - you vote for them in the hope they reduce immigration but you find that you're being lied to. |
|
By:
In a rapidly changing world were automation and robotics are the future its not more people we need its less.
Also Britain has relied on imported food but we now are heavily dependent on vast amounts of this imported food, none of the political parties have said they intend to implement a system that reduces or better still makes us self sufficient in the production of food should we require it. Not only is the world population growing at unsustainable rate, but should some worldwide disaster man made or otherwise will leave the UK seriously exposed to both the price and the availability of the food we currently import. In other words we have no contingency plan and we have politicians who have no clue. For the sake of a couple of billion quid every city in the UK could self sufficient in both food and gas and electric. |
|
By:
detraveller, Brexit was scheduled for March 2019. That in itself would have taken any government nearly 3 years to deliver. The subsequent delay is pretty much down to Theresa May failed gamble when she called an election for June 2017 in the hope she would win more seats to secure Brexit and actually losing seats. The problem was and still is that the majority of the house of commons MP's are remainers and have time and time again blocked the referendum result. The reason I state this is that if the tories gain an overall majority at this election, Brexit will go ahead as all candidates standing for them are as far as I know in favour of Brexit and the deal Boris has.
|
|
By:
meanwhile year by year the influence grows
20,000/300 now there are serious articles about it at last but you read it here first |
|
By:
once they tighten up on the 'blasphemy' laws there will be no debate
|
|
By:
Who were the last people to be up on a blasphemy charge was it the boys from OZ magazine?
|
|
By:
Charlie Hebdo.
|
|
By:
Hilarious that someone would waste their time picking 31 seats that have small majorities, with some muslim folks as constituents, say they could decide the election, then get all the thick racist mugs on here to lap it up.
|
|
By:
Yes, why did the Muslim Council of Britain compile this list of 31 winnable marginals where Muslim voters could have a "high impact", and those findings get reported in The Guardian newspaper?
(See article linked in opening post, copied again below to make it easier for the not very bright). . https://uk.yahoo.com/news/muslim-voters-could-swing-31-093533652.html |
|
By:
In a shock report out today it is claimed that white people could influence the results of up to 650 constituencies at the general election.
|
|
By:
the only defence at a takeover of constituencies is to cast those who are critical as being of a thick racist persuasion. I do wonder that in itself is both racist and thick in content. Not much of an intelligent response is it. The supporters of mass immigration and sucking up to the eu like punter would though. They have no other argument.
Just play the cards instead. Clearly punter is a racist. I see he starts to mention white. Now why would he do that. Who brought colour of skin into the discussion? Only him? Punter is on the side of the Muslim council - did you know what it was called before it changed its name. It will give you a clue what they are about. |
|
By:
Yes, why did the Muslim Council of Britain compile this list of 31 winnable marginals where Muslim voters could...
Because its the muslim council. It makes sense for them to have a list of constituencies where they can get their own people in power. What was their previous name? |